Suppr超能文献

衡量公共资助生育护理中的以患者为中心程度:《以患者为中心问卷 - 不孕症》的新西兰验证及国际比较

Measuring patient-centredness in publicly funded fertility care: A New Zealand validation and international comparison of the Patient-Centred Questionnaire-Infertility.

作者信息

Mourad Selma M, Curtis Cate, Gudex Guy, Merrilees Margaret, Peek John, Sadler Lynn

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

School of Psychology, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Apr;59(2):265-271. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12869. Epub 2018 Aug 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Patient-Centred Questionnaire-Infertility (PCQ-Infertility) has proven to be a reliable instrument to assess the extent of patient-centredness of fertility care in European countries.

AIMS

To validate the PCQ-Infertility in New Zealand (NZ) and to compare results with international experience.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional 46-item questionnaire study among 409 women undergoing publicly funded fertility care (intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilisation / intracytoplasmic sperm injection) in three fertility clinics in the Northern Auckland region was performed between October 2015 and September 2016. Inclusion of eligible participants was both retro- and prospective. The questionnaire was distributed by email link and women were asked to complete it with their partner. Internal consistency and construct validity were determined and correction for case mix was performed. Mean dimension scores, adjusted for 'current pregnancy', 'educational level' and 'treatment type', were calculated for each dimension of the PCQ-Infertility. NZ results were compared with PCQ-Infertility results from five countries.

RESULTS

Of 409 invited women, 255 questionnaires were submitted (response rate 62%), of which 216 (53%) were analysable. The dimension 'Care organization' had poor internal consistency, but overall the questionnaire had high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.93). Construct validity was also good. International comparison showed NZ to have the second highest overall score. In New Zealand, the lowest scoring domain was 'Continuity and transition'.

CONCLUSIONS

The NZ version of the PCQ-infertility proved a valid instrument for the assessment of patient-centredness of publicly funded fertility care. Future research should focus on international inequities in patient-centred fertility care and use of the tool for quality improvement. Local use of the PCQ-Infertility is encouraged.

摘要

背景

以患者为中心的不孕症问卷(PCQ - 不孕症)已被证明是评估欧洲国家生育护理以患者为中心程度的可靠工具。

目的

在新西兰(NZ)验证PCQ - 不孕症问卷,并将结果与国际经验进行比较。

材料与方法

2015年10月至2016年9月期间,在奥克兰北部地区的三家生育诊所对409名接受公共资助生育护理(宫内人工授精或体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射)的女性进行了一项横断面的46项问卷调查研究。符合条件的参与者纳入既有回顾性的也有前瞻性的。问卷通过电子邮件链接分发,要求女性与伴侣一起完成。确定了内部一致性和结构效度,并对病例组合进行了校正。针对PCQ - 不孕症问卷的每个维度,计算了经“当前妊娠情况”、“教育水平”和“治疗类型”调整后的平均维度得分。将新西兰的结果与五个国家的PCQ - 不孕症问卷结果进行了比较。

结果

在409名受邀女性中,提交了255份问卷(回复率62%),其中216份(53%)可用于分析。“护理组织”维度的内部一致性较差,但总体而言问卷具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.93)。结构效度也良好。国际比较显示新西兰的总体得分第二高。在新西兰,得分最低的领域是“连续性和过渡”。

结论

新西兰版的PCQ - 不孕症问卷被证明是评估公共资助生育护理以患者为中心程度的有效工具。未来的研究应关注以患者为中心的生育护理方面的国际不平等现象,以及使用该工具进行质量改进。鼓励在当地使用PCQ - 不孕症问卷。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验