Endo Motoki, Haruyama Yasuo, Mitsui Kiyomi, Muto Go, Nishiura Chihiro, Kuwahara Keisuke, Wada Hiroo, Tanigawa Takashi
Department of Public Health, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
Department of Public Health, Dokkyo Medical University, Japan.
Ind Health. 2019 Feb 5;57(1):22-28. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2018-0023. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
This study aimed to clarify the difference between the durations of first and second periods of depression-induced sick leave and to identify predictors of a prolonged second period of depression-induced sick leave. Among Japanese employees who were registered in the Japan sickness absence and return to work (J-SAR) study, the subjects were those employees who returned to work after an initial period of depression-induced sick leave (F3; ICD-10, based on a psychiatrist's certificate), and returned to work after a second period of depression-induced sick leave. The subjects' second periods of sick leave (mean: 156.9 d) were longer than their first periods of sick leave (107.3 d) (Wilcoxon test, p=0.007). In the logistic regression analysis (Table 2), "longer duration of the first period of sick leave" (Odds ratio: 3.258, 95%CI: 1.780-5.963, p<0.001) was identified as a significant predictor of a longer recurrent period of sick leave. Individuals who experience a long initial period of depression-induced sick leave should be supported carefully by occupational health professionals after they RTW.
本研究旨在阐明因抑郁症导致病假的第一阶段和第二阶段时长的差异,并确定导致因抑郁症导致病假的第二阶段延长的预测因素。在参与日本病假与重返工作岗位(J-SAR)研究的日本员工中,研究对象为那些在因抑郁症导致病假的初始阶段(F3;基于精神科医生证明的国际疾病分类第10版)后重返工作岗位,且在因抑郁症导致病假的第二阶段后重返工作岗位的员工。研究对象因抑郁症导致病假的第二阶段时长(平均:156.9天)长于第一阶段(107.3天)(Wilcoxon检验,p = 0.007)。在逻辑回归分析中(表2),“第一阶段病假时长较长”(比值比:3.258,95%置信区间:1.780 - 5.963,p < 0.001)被确定为病假复发期较长的显著预测因素。经历因抑郁症导致病假初始阶段较长的个体在重返工作岗位后,职业健康专业人员应给予其悉心支持。