Suppr超能文献

新型高密度脑电方法能否区分主观认知障碍者对负性面孔刺激诱发的视觉事件相关电位(N170)的差异?

Can a Novel High-Density EEG Approach Disentangle the Differences of Visual Event Related Potential (N170), Elicited by Negative Facial Stimuli, in People with Subjective Cognitive Impairment?

机构信息

Information Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece.

1st Department of Neurology, G.H. "AHEPA", School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;65(2):543-575. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180223.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies on subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) and neural activation report controversial results.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ability to disentangle the differences of visual N170 ERP, generated by facial stimuli (Anger & Fear) as well as the cognitive deterioration of SCI, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer's disease (AD) compared to healthy controls (HC).

METHOD

57 people took part in this study. Images corresponding to facial stimuli of "Anger" and "Fear" were presented to 12 HC, 14 SCI, 17 MCI and 14 AD participants. EEG data were recorded by using a HD-EEG HydroCel with 256 channels.

RESULTS

Results showed that the amplitude of N170 can contribute in distinguishing the SCI group, since statistically significant differences were observed with the HC (p < 0.05) and the MCI group from HC (p < 0.001), as well as AD from HC (p = 0.05) during the processing of facial stimuli. Noticeable differences were also observed in the topographic distribution of the N170 amplitude, while localization analysis by using sLORETA images confirmed the activation of superior, middle-temporal, and frontal lobe brain regions. Finally, in the case of "Fear", SCI and HC demonstrated increased activation in the orbital and inferior frontal gyrus, respectively, MCI in the inferior temporal gyrus, and AD in the lingual gyrus.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary findings suggest that the amplitude of N170 elicited after negative facial stimuli could be modulated by the decline related to pathological cognitive aging and can contribute in distinguishing HC from SCI, MCI, and AD.

摘要

背景

关于主观认知障碍(SCI)和神经激活的研究报告结果存在争议。

目的

评估区分视觉 N170 ERP 差异的能力,该差异由面部刺激(愤怒和恐惧)以及 SCI、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的认知恶化产生,与健康对照组(HC)相比。

方法

共有 57 人参与了这项研究。向 12 名 HC、14 名 SCI、17 名 MCI 和 14 名 AD 参与者呈现对应于面部刺激的“愤怒”和“恐惧”图像。使用带有 256 个通道的 HD-EEG HydroCel 记录 EEG 数据。

结果

结果表明,N170 的振幅可以有助于区分 SCI 组,因为与 HC(p < 0.05)和与 HC 相比的 MCI 组(p < 0.001)相比,观察到统计学显着差异,以及 AD 与 HC(p = 0.05)在处理面部刺激时。还观察到 N170 振幅的拓扑分布存在明显差异,而使用 sLORETA 图像进行的定位分析证实了上颞叶、中颞叶和额叶脑区的激活。最后,在“恐惧”的情况下,SCI 和 HC 分别在眶额回和额下回表现出增加的激活,MCI 在颞下回,AD 在舌回。

结论

这些初步发现表明,与病理性认知衰老相关的下降可以调节负面面部刺激后产生的 N170 振幅,并有助于将 HC 与 SCI、MCI 和 AD 区分开来。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验