• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在茧中工作:办公室游牧族的(共同)工作条件——关于共享工作环境的健康相关质性研究

Working in a cocoon: (Co)working conditions of office nomads - a health related qualitative study of shared working environments.

作者信息

Servaty Ricarda, Perger Gabriele, Harth Volker, Mache Stefanie

机构信息

University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany.

Institute for Occupational and Maritime Medicine (ZfAM), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Work. 2018;60(4):527-538. doi: 10.3233/WOR-182760.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-182760
PMID:30103360
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The flexible working and business model of coworking spaces inherits the provision of workspace and further the construction of a network for entrepreneurs, creative and knowledge workers. Until now, research on coworking spaces is scarce in the field of health sciences.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated reasons and motives for working in coworking spaces and working conditions under health related aspects. Demands and resources while working in coworking spaces were analyzed according to a theoretical model for (Job-demands-resources model - JDR) perceived working conditions.

METHODS

Twenty semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with coworkers (n = 14) and coworking operators (n = 6) in Berlin, Hamburg, and Munich. Participants were asked to describe the reasons and motivations for working in coworking spaces and their perceived working conditions. Transcripts were analyzed according to content analysis.

RESULTS

The most mentioned reason for using coworking spaces were the community aspect (n = 15) followed by the alternative to home office (n = 12). Negative job demands seem to result from unfavorable ergonomic conditions, working disruptions, miscommunications and missing privacy. Time flexibility, social surrounding and increased productivity were interpreted as job resources.

CONCLUSIONS

These results can be seen as a basis for further quantitative research in order to generalize these findings, by testing hypotheses and develop workplace-related concepts for health management.

摘要

背景

共享办公空间灵活的工作和商业模式继承了工作空间的提供,进而构建了一个面向创业者、创意工作者和知识工作者的网络。到目前为止,健康科学领域对共享办公空间的研究很少。

目的

本研究调查了在共享办公空间工作的原因和动机以及与健康相关方面的工作条件。根据感知工作条件的理论模型(工作需求-资源模型-JDR)分析了在共享办公空间工作时的需求和资源。

方法

在柏林、汉堡和慕尼黑对共享办公者(n = 14)和共享办公运营商(n = 6)进行了20次半结构化定性访谈。参与者被要求描述在共享办公空间工作的原因和动机以及他们感知到的工作条件。根据内容分析法对访谈记录进行分析。

结果

使用共享办公空间最常提到的原因是社交方面(n = 15),其次是家庭办公的替代选择(n = 12)。负面工作需求似乎源于不利的人体工程学条件、工作干扰、沟通不畅和缺乏隐私。时间灵活性、社交环境和提高的生产力被视为工作资源。

结论

这些结果可被视为进一步定量研究的基础,以便通过检验假设来概括这些发现,并为健康管理开发与工作场所相关的概念。

相似文献

1
Working in a cocoon: (Co)working conditions of office nomads - a health related qualitative study of shared working environments.在茧中工作:办公室游牧族的(共同)工作条件——关于共享工作环境的健康相关质性研究
Work. 2018;60(4):527-538. doi: 10.3233/WOR-182760.
2
Coworking Spaces: The Better Home Office? A Psychosocial and Health-Related Perspective on an Emerging Work Environment.联合办公空间:比家庭办公室更好的选择?一种新兴工作环境的社会心理和健康相关视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 4;16(13):2379. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132379.
3
Coworking Spaces: A Source of Social Support for Independent Professionals.共享办公空间:独立专业人士的社会支持来源。
Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 25;7:581. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00581. eCollection 2016.
4
Do We Have a Match? Assessing the Role of Community in Coworking Spaces Based on a Person-Environment Fit Framework.我们匹配吗?基于人-环境适配框架评估社区在共享工作空间中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 9;12:620794. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620794. eCollection 2021.
5
Coworking spaces vs. home: Does employees' experience of the negative aspects of working from home predict their intention to telework in a coworking space?共享办公空间与居家办公:员工对居家办公负面影响的体验是否能预测他们在共享办公空间远程工作的意愿?
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 8;13:1079691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1079691. eCollection 2022.
6
Linking real estate data with entrepreneurial ecosystems: Coworking spaces, funding and founding activity of start-ups.将房地产数据与创业生态系统相联系:联合办公空间、初创企业的融资与创立活动。
Data Brief. 2021 May 29;37:107185. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107185. eCollection 2021 Aug.
7
Activity-based working: Qualitative analysis of working conditions and health-related outcomes.基于活动的工作:工作条件和健康相关结果的定性分析。
Work. 2020;67(3):625-639. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203313.
8
If it isn't finished at five, then I'll continue until it is. A qualitative study of work pressure among employees in vocational education.如果五点还没完成,那我就继续做,直到完成。一项关于职业教育员工工作压力的定性研究。
Work. 2018;61(1):69-80. doi: 10.3233/WOR-182780.
9
Understanding the shared working spaces: a Geography of Co-working supply in Delhi.了解共享工作空间:德里联合办公供应的地理分布
GeoJournal. 2023;88(3):3439-3453. doi: 10.1007/s10708-022-10811-4. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
10
Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.职业心理社会因素与冠心病流行病学的方法学和概念性问题
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 May 1;42(3):251-5. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3557. Epub 2016 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Health systems responsiveness towards the Mentor Mother Program for preventing mother-to-child transmission of HIV in military hospitals.卫生系统对军事医院预防母婴传播艾滋病毒的指导员母亲方案的反应情况。
Nurs Open. 2023 Apr;10(4):2295-2308. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1483. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
2
Digital platforms: Perceived criteria of success, importance of work design, occupational safety and health for present and prospective digital platforms.数字平台:成功的感知标准、工作设计的重要性、当前和未来数字平台的职业安全与健康。
Work. 2022;72(4):1593-1610. doi: 10.3233/WOR-211253.
3
Coworking Spaces: The Better Home Office? A Psychosocial and Health-Related Perspective on an Emerging Work Environment.
联合办公空间:比家庭办公室更好的选择?一种新兴工作环境的社会心理和健康相关视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 4;16(13):2379. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132379.