Seidler Zac E, Rice Simon M, Ogrodniczuk John S, Oliffe John L, Dhillon Haryana M
1 School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
2 Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Nov;12(6):1882-1900. doi: 10.1177/1557988318792157. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
Tailoring psychological treatments to men's specific needs has been a topic of concern for decades given evidence that many men are reticent to seek professional health care. However, existing literature providing clinical recommendations for engaging men in psychological treatments is diffuse. The aim of this scoping review was to provide a comprehensive summary of recommendations for how to engage men in psychological treatment. Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO) were searched for articles published between 2000 and 2017. Titles and abstracts were reviewed; data extracted and synthesized thematically. Of 3,627 citations identified, 46 met the inclusion criteria. Thirty articles (65%) were reviews or commentaries; 23 (50%) provided broad recommendations for working with all men. Findings indicate providing male-appropriate psychological treatment requires clinicians to consider the impact of masculine socialization on their client and themselves, and how gender norms may impact clinical engagement and outcomes. Existing literature also emphasized specific process micro-skills (e.g., self-disclosure, normalizing), language adaption (e.g., male-oriented metaphors) and treatment styles most engaging for men (e.g., collaborative, transparent, action-oriented, goal-focused). Presented are clinical recommendations for how to engage men in psychological treatments including paying attention to tapping the strengths of multiple masculinities coexisting within and across men. Our review suggests more empirically informed tailored interventions are needed, along with formal program evaluations to advance the evidence base.
鉴于有证据表明许多男性不愿寻求专业医疗保健,根据男性的特定需求调整心理治疗方法数十年来一直是备受关注的话题。然而,现有为男性参与心理治疗提供临床建议的文献较为分散。本范围综述的目的是全面总结关于如何让男性参与心理治疗的建议。我们在四个电子数据库(MEDLINE、PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO)中检索了2000年至2017年发表的文章。对标题和摘要进行了审查;提取数据并进行主题综合分析。在识别出的3627条引用中,46条符合纳入标准。30篇文章(65%)为综述或评论;23篇(50%)为与所有男性合作提供了广泛建议。研究结果表明,提供适合男性的心理治疗要求临床医生考虑男性社会化对其客户和自身的影响,以及性别规范可能如何影响临床参与度和治疗效果。现有文献还强调了特定的过程微技能(如自我表露、正常化)、语言调整(如以男性为导向的隐喻)以及对男性最具吸引力的治疗风格(如合作、透明、行动导向、目标聚焦)。本文给出了关于如何让男性参与心理治疗的临床建议,包括关注挖掘男性内部和不同男性之间共存的多种男性气质的优势。我们的综述表明,需要更多基于实证的针对性干预措施,以及正式的项目评估来推进证据基础。