University of California at San Diego, Department of Emergency Medicine, 200 W Arbor Drive, San Diego, CA 92102, United States of America.
University of California at San Diego, Department of Emergency Medicine, 200 W Arbor Drive, San Diego, CA 92102, United States of America.
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 May;37(5):895-901. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
We generated a novel scoring system to improve the test characteristics of D-dimer in patients with suspected PE (pulmonary emboli). Electronic Medical Record data were retrospectively reviewed on Emergency Department (ED) patients 18 years or older for whom a D-dimer and imaging were ordered between June 4, 2012 and March 30, 2016. Symptoms (dyspnea, unilateral leg swelling, hemoptysis), age, vital signs, medical history (cancer, recent surgery, medications, history of deep vein thrombosis or PE, COPD, smoking), laboratory values (quantitative D-dimer, platelets, and mean platelet volume (MPV)), and imaging results (CT, VQ) were collected. Points were designated to factors that were significant in two multiple regression analyses, for PE or positive D-dimer. Points predictive of PE were designated positive values and points predictive of positive D-dimer, irrespective of presence of PE, were designated negative values. The DAGMAR (D-dimer Assay-Guided Moderation of Adjusted Risk) score was developed using age and platelet adjustment and points for factors associated with PE and elevated D-dimer. Of 8486 visits reviewed, 3523 were unique visits with imaging, yielding 2253 (26.5%) positive D-dimers. 3501 CT scans and 156 VQ scans were completed, detecting 198 PE. In our cohort, a DAGMAR Score < 2 equated to overall PE risk < 1.2%. Specificity improved (38% to 59%) without compromising sensitivity (94% to 96%). Use of the DAGMAR Score would have reduced CT scans from 2253 to 1556 and lead to fewer false negative results. By considering factors that affect D-dimer and also PE, we improved specificity without compromising sensitivity.
我们生成了一种新的评分系统,以提高疑似肺栓塞(PE)患者 D-二聚体的检测特征。回顾性分析 2012 年 6 月 4 日至 2016 年 3 月 30 日期间,年龄在 18 岁或以上、接受过 D-二聚体和影像学检查的急诊科(ED)患者的电子病历数据。收集了症状(呼吸困难、单侧腿部肿胀、咯血)、年龄、生命体征、病史(癌症、近期手术、药物、深静脉血栓或 PE 病史、COPD、吸烟)、实验室值(定量 D-二聚体、血小板和平均血小板体积(MPV))和影像学结果(CT、VQ)。在两个多变量回归分析中,对与 PE 或阳性 D-二聚体相关的因素进行评分。对有预测 PE 价值的因素赋予正值,对无论是否存在 PE 均有预测阳性 D-二聚体价值的因素赋予负值。使用年龄和血小板调整以及与 PE 和 D-二聚体升高相关的因素,制定了 DAGMAR(D-二聚体检测指导风险调整)评分。在审查的 8486 次就诊中,有 3523 次是有影像学检查的就诊,其中 2253 次(26.5%)D-二聚体阳性。完成了 3501 次 CT 扫描和 156 次 VQ 扫描,共检出 198 例 PE。在我们的队列中,DAGMAR 评分<2 相当于总体 PE 风险<1.2%。特异性提高(38%至 59%)而不影响敏感性(94%至 96%)。使用 DAGMAR 评分可将 CT 扫描从 2253 次减少至 1556 次,并减少假阴性结果。通过考虑影响 D-二聚体和 PE 的因素,我们在不影响敏感性的情况下提高了特异性。