Kaplan Sigal, Goehring Earl L, Melamed-Gal Sigal, Nguyen-Khoa Bao-Anh, Knebel Helena, Jones Judith K
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Petach Tikva, Israel.
The Degge Group, Ltd, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Nov;27(11):1182-1190. doi: 10.1002/pds.4642. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
This study examined the potential risk of cardiovascular (CV) events associated with modafinil and the consistency of the risk estimates across databases.
A retrospective, inception cohort design of patients who initiated treatment with modafinil between 2006 and 2008 was used in three US health care claims databases. Modafinil users were matched with nonusers. Patients were further divided into two cohorts of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and non-OSA (NOSA) cohorts. Endpoints of interest, including myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, CV hospitalizations, and all-cause death, were assessed using incidence rates and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for potential confounding factors.
The cohorts included a total of 175 524 patients in MarketScan CM; 77 266-in IMS LifeLink; and 8174-in MarketScan Medicaid. No increased risk for MI in the OSA and NOSA cohorts was observed across all three databases. The risks of CV hospitalization in the OSA and NOSA cohorts were not different between the modafinil users and nonusers, except for IMS LifeLink database where the HR was lower than one in the modafinil users compared with the nonusers (HR, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.87). For OSA patients with prior stroke, an adjusted HR of 1.96 (95% CI, 1.02 to 3.76) was observed for stroke among modafinil users compared with nonusers. Among the NOSA, the HRs for all-cause death in the OSA were inconsistent across databases.
Except for few CV outcomes, applying one common protocol generated consistent risk estimates of CV events following modafinil use across cohorts and databases.
本研究探讨了与莫达非尼相关的心血管(CV)事件潜在风险,以及各数据库中风险估计的一致性。
在美国三个医疗保健索赔数据库中,采用回顾性起始队列设计,纳入2006年至2008年开始使用莫达非尼治疗的患者。将莫达非尼使用者与非使用者进行匹配。患者进一步分为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)和非阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(NOSA)两个队列。使用发病率和Cox比例风险比(HR)评估包括心肌梗死(MI)、中风、CV住院和全因死亡在内的感兴趣终点,并对潜在混杂因素进行调整。
MarketScan CM队列共纳入175524例患者;IMS LifeLink队列纳入77266例;MarketScan Medicaid队列纳入8174例。在所有三个数据库中,OSA和NOSA队列均未观察到MI风险增加。除IMS LifeLink数据库外,莫达非尼使用者和非使用者在OSA和NOSA队列中的CV住院风险无差异,在该数据库中,与非使用者相比,莫达非尼使用者的HR低于1(HR,0.69;95%置信区间[CI],0.54至0.87)。对于既往有中风的OSA患者,与非使用者相比,莫达非尼使用者中风的校正HR为1.96(95%CI,1.02至3.76)。在NOSA中,OSA全因死亡的HR在各数据库中不一致。
除少数CV结局外,采用一个通用方案可在各队列和数据库中对使用莫达非尼后的CV事件产生一致的风险估计。