Suppr超能文献

单子叶植物和双子叶植物叶片发育的机制。

On the mechanisms of development in monocot and eudicot leaves.

机构信息

Plant Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

出版信息

New Phytol. 2019 Jan;221(2):706-724. doi: 10.1111/nph.15371. Epub 2018 Aug 14.

Abstract

Contents Summary 706 I. Introduction 707 II. Leaf zones in monocot and eudicot leaves 707 III. Monocot and eudicot leaf initiation: differences in degree and timing, but not kind 710 IV. Reticulate and parallel venation: extending the model? 711 V. Flat laminar growth: patterning and coordination of adaxial-abaxial and mediolateral axes 713 VI. Stipules and ligules: ontogeny of primordial elaborations 715 VII. Leaf architecture 716 VIII. Stomatal development: shared and diverged mechanisms for making epidermal pores 717 IX. Conclusion 719 Acknowledgements 720 References 720 SUMMARY: Comparisons of concepts in monocot and eudicot leaf development are presented, with attention to the morphologies and mechanisms separating these angiosperm lineages. Monocot and eudicot leaves are distinguished by the differential elaborations of upper and lower leaf zones, the formation of sheathing/nonsheathing leaf bases and vasculature patterning. We propose that monocot and eudicot leaves undergo expansion of mediolateral domains at different times in ontogeny, directly impacting features such as venation and leaf bases. Furthermore, lineage-specific mechanisms in compound leaf development are discussed. Although models for the homologies of enigmatic tissues, such as ligules and stipules, are proposed, tests of these hypotheses are rare. Likewise, comparisons of stomatal development are limited to Arabidopsis and a few grasses. Future studies may investigate correlations in the ontogenies of parallel venation and linear stomatal files in monocots, and the reticulate patterning of veins and dispersed stoma in eudicots. Although many fundamental mechanisms of leaf development are shared in eudicots and monocots, variations in the timing, degree and duration of these ontogenetic events may contribute to key differences in morphology. We anticipate that the incorporation of an ever-expanding number of sequenced genomes will enrich our understanding of the developmental mechanisms generating eudicot and monocot leaves.

摘要

内容概述 706 I. 引言 707 II. 单子叶植物和双子叶植物叶片的叶区 707 III. 单子叶植物和双子叶植物叶的发生:程度和时间上的差异,而非本质上的不同 710 IV. 网状和平行叶脉:扩展模型? 711 V. 平面层状生长:近轴-远轴和中-侧轴的模式形成和协调 713 VI. 托叶和叶舌:原始特化的个体发生 715 VII. 叶片结构 716 VIII. 气孔发育:形成表皮孔的共享和分化机制 717 IX. 结论 719 Acknowledgements 720 参考文献 720 摘要:本文介绍了单子叶植物和双子叶植物叶发育概念的比较,特别关注区分这两个被子植物谱系的形态和机制。单子叶植物和双子叶植物叶片的区别在于上、下叶区的不同特化、鞘状/非鞘状叶片基部和脉序模式的形成。我们提出,单子叶植物和双子叶植物在个体发生的不同时间扩展中-侧域,直接影响脉序和叶片基部等特征。此外,还讨论了复叶发育中谱系特异性机制。尽管提出了关于一些神秘组织(如叶舌和托叶)同源性的模型,但这些假说的验证很少。同样,对气孔发育的比较也仅限于拟南芥和少数禾本科植物。未来的研究可能会调查单子叶植物中平行脉序和线性气孔列的个体发生以及双子叶植物中脉序的网状模式和分散的气孔之间的相关性。尽管单子叶植物和双子叶植物有许多叶片发育的基本机制是共有的,但这些个体发生事件的时间、程度和持续时间的变化可能导致形态上的关键差异。我们预计,随着越来越多的已测序基因组的加入,将丰富我们对产生单子叶植物和双子叶植物叶片的发育机制的理解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验