• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较RENAL、帕多瓦、CSA和PAVP肾计量评分在预测部分肾切除术后功能结局中的作用。

Comparison of RENAL, PADUA, CSA, and PAVP Nephrometry Scores in Predicting Functional Outcomes After Partial Nephrectomy.

作者信息

Gupta Ruchir, Tori Marco, Babitz Stephen K, Tobert Conrad M, Anema John G, Noyes Sabrina L, Lane Brian R

机构信息

Washington and Jefferson College, Washington, PA; Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI.

Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI.

出版信息

Urology. 2019 Feb;124:160-167. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.03.055. Epub 2018 Aug 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2018.03.055
PMID:30107186
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness to collecting system/sinus, anterior/posterior, and location relative to polar lines (RENAL), preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomical classification (PADUA), contact surface area (CSA), and preoperative assessment of volume preservation (PAVP) nephrometry scores in predicting postoperative renal functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN). Few studies have compared the accuracy of tumor complexity systems directly in the same set of PN patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated with robotic, laparoscopic, or open PN having available imaging (n = 344) were examined. The ability of 4 systems to predict nadir estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR [median postoperative day 1]) and new baseline eGFR (median: 0.95 year) was analyzed using univariable and multivariable models.

RESULTS

Median preoperative, nadir, and new baseline eGFR were 79 (interquartile range [IQR]: 63-97), 65 (IQR: 47-85), and 80 (IQR: 63-99) mL/min/1.73 m. Multivariable models incorporating RENAL, PADUA, CSA, or PAVP were similarly predictive of postoperative renal function (nadir eGFR: R = 0.683-0.688, new baseline eGFR: R = 0.775). In univariable analysis, all 4 complexity systems were predictors of nadir GFR (each P < .05), with RENAL (P = .045), CSA (P = .027), and PAVP (P = .012) also significantly predicting nadir eGFR in multivariable models. No complexity system was significantly associated with new baseline eGFR in multivariable analysis, with only RENAL (P = .023) and PAVP (P = .049) having a statistically significant association in univariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

RENAL, PADUA, CSA, and PAVP are all predictors of early postoperative renal function. RENAL and PAVP provided the greatest predictive ability for later renal functional outcomes.

摘要

目的

评估肾肿瘤半径、外生性/内生性、与集合系统/肾窦的距离、前后位置以及相对于极线的位置(RENAL)、用于解剖学分类的术前特征和尺寸(PADUA)、接触表面积(CSA)以及术前肾功能保留评估(PAVP)肾计量评分在预测部分肾切除术(PN)术后肾功能结局方面的准确性。很少有研究在同一组PN患者中直接比较肿瘤复杂性系统的准确性。

材料与方法

对接受机器人手术、腹腔镜手术或开放手术的PN且有可用影像学资料的患者(n = 344)进行检查。使用单变量和多变量模型分析4种系统预测最低估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR[术后第1天中位数])和新的基线eGFR(中位数:0.95年)的能力。

结果

术前、最低和新的基线eGFR中位数分别为79(四分位间距[IQR]:63 - 97)、65(IQR:47 - 85)和80(IQR:63 - 99)mL/min/1.73 m²。纳入RENAL、PADUA、CSA或PAVP的多变量模型对术后肾功能的预测相似(最低eGFR:R = 0.683 - 0.688,新的基线eGFR:R = 0.775)。在单变量分析中,所有4种复杂性系统都是最低GFR的预测因素(各P < 0.05),在多变量模型中,RENAL(P = 0.045)、CSA(P = 0.027)和PAVP(P = 0.012)也显著预测最低eGFR。在多变量分析中,没有复杂性系统与新的基线eGFR显著相关,在单变量分析中只有RENAL(P = 0.023)和PAVP(P = 0.049)有统计学显著相关性。

结论

RENAL、PADUA、CSA和PAVP都是术后早期肾功能的预测因素。RENAL和PAVP对后期肾功能结局的预测能力最强。

相似文献

1
Comparison of RENAL, PADUA, CSA, and PAVP Nephrometry Scores in Predicting Functional Outcomes After Partial Nephrectomy.比较RENAL、帕多瓦、CSA和PAVP肾计量评分在预测部分肾切除术后功能结局中的作用。
Urology. 2019 Feb;124:160-167. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.03.055. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
2
Performance Prediction for Surgical Outcomes in Partial Nephrectomy Using Nephrometry Scores: A Comparison of Arterial Based Complexity (ABC), RENAL, and PADUA Systems.基于肾动脉复杂性(ABC)、RENAL 和 PADUA 系统的肾部分切除术手术结局的肾肿瘤影像学评分预测:比较研究。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Oct;1(5):428-434. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 30.
3
Tumour contact surface area as a predictor of postoperative complications and renal function in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal tumours.肿瘤接触面面积作为预测肾部分切除术治疗肾肿瘤患者术后并发症和肾功能的指标。
BJU Int. 2019 Apr;123(4):639-645. doi: 10.1111/bju.14567. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
4
PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores correlate with perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of the Vattikuti Global Quality Initiative in Robotic Urologic Surgery (GQI-RUS) database.PADUA和R.E.N.A.L.肾计量评分与机器人辅助部分肾切除术的围手术期结果相关:Vattikuti全球机器人泌尿外科手术质量倡议(GQI-RUS)数据库分析
BJU Int. 2017 Mar;119(3):456-463. doi: 10.1111/bju.13628. Epub 2016 Sep 11.
5
Predictive Value of Nephrometry Scores in Nephron-sparing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.肾部分切除术的肾肿瘤评分的预测价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 May 15;6(3):490-504. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Nov 24.
6
The role of RENAL, PADUA, C-index, CSA nephrometry systems in predicting ipsilateral renal function after partial nephrectomy.RENAL、PADUA、C-index、CSA 肾单位切除术系统在预测部分肾切除术后同侧肾功能中的作用。
BMC Urol. 2019 Aug 5;19(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0504-2.
7
Simplified PADUA Renal (SPARE) Nephrometry Scoring System: External Validation, Interobserver Variability, and Comparison with RENAL and PADUA in a Single-center Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Series.简化 Padua 肾脏(SPARE)肾肿瘤评分系统:单中心机器人辅助部分肾切除术系列中的外部验证、观察者间变异性以及与 RENAL 和 Padua 的比较。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 May;7(3):591-597. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.05.016. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
8
Renal tumour anatomical characteristics and functional outcome after partial nephrectomy.肾肿瘤的解剖特征及部分肾切除术后的功能转归
Scand J Urol. 2015 Jun;49(3):193-9. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.978819. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
9
Tumor volume and tumor crossing of the axial renal midline predict renal function after robotic partial nephrectomy.肿瘤体积和轴向肾中线肿瘤穿越预测机器人部分肾切除术对肾功能的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 18;11(1):22526. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01539-1.
10
Nephrometry scores and perioperative outcomes following robotic partial nephrectomy.机器人辅助肾部分切除术后的肾测量评分与围手术期结局
Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Nov-Dec;43(6):1075-1083. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0571.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Immunotherapy Era: A Propensity Score Matching, Population-Based Analysis.免疫治疗时代转移性肾细胞癌行部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术的比较:一项倾向评分匹配的基于人群的分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17642-w.
2
Durability of Active Surveillance for Localized Renal Masses: 3-year Outcomes in the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative.局限性肾肿块主动监测的耐久性:密歇根泌尿外科手术改进协作组的3年结果
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025 Mar 26;75:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.02.005. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Evaluation of modified RENAL nephrometry score in the prediction of perioperative outcomes of open partial nephrectomy.
改良RENAL肾计量评分在预测开放性部分肾切除术围手术期结局中的应用评估
Indian J Urol. 2023 Jul-Sep;39(3):202-208. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_66_23. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
4
Impact of tumor contact surface area on collecting system entry in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a retrospective analysis.肿瘤接触面积对机器人辅助部分肾切除术收集系统进入的影响:回顾性分析。
BMC Urol. 2023 May 8;23(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01247-0.
5
On-Clamp vs. Off-Clamp Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for cT2 Renal Tumors: Retrospective Propensity-Score-Matched Multicenter Outcome Analysis.夹闭与非夹闭机器人辅助肾部分切除术治疗cT2期肾肿瘤:回顾性倾向评分匹配多中心结果分析
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 13;14(18):4431. doi: 10.3390/cancers14184431.
6
Evaluation of surgery-related kidney volume loss to predict the outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with segmental renal artery clamping.评估与手术相关的肾单位丢失量预测肾动脉阻断节段性腹腔镜部分肾切除术的结果。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2020 Jan;52(1):35-40. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02293-0. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
7
The role of RENAL, PADUA, C-index, CSA nephrometry systems in predicting ipsilateral renal function after partial nephrectomy.RENAL、PADUA、C-index、CSA 肾单位切除术系统在预测部分肾切除术后同侧肾功能中的作用。
BMC Urol. 2019 Aug 5;19(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0504-2.