• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良RENAL肾计量评分在预测开放性部分肾切除术围手术期结局中的应用评估

Evaluation of modified RENAL nephrometry score in the prediction of perioperative outcomes of open partial nephrectomy.

作者信息

Kamath K Annappa, Pothy Vasudevan S, Pandey Himanshu

机构信息

Department of Urology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Indian J Urol. 2023 Jul-Sep;39(3):202-208. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_66_23. Epub 2023 Jun 30.

DOI:10.4103/iju.iju_66_23
PMID:37575169
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10419784/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

RENAL nephrometry score (RNS) is a standardized system to grade the complexity of renal masses, but it does not correlate well with the perioperative outcomes of open partial nephrectomy (OPN). To overcome these shortcomings, a modified RNS (MRNS) has been proposed. In this study, we evaluated the MRNS and its role in predicting the perioperative outcomes of OPN.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study performed at a tertiary care hospital to evaluate the efficacy of MRNS in predicting the perioperative outcomes of OPN. Sixty-four cases were included in the study. Demographic parameters, tumor characteristics, and perioperative outcomes were analyzed. Correlation with the post-operative outcomes and the strengths of MRNS were compared with various other nephrometry scores.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 52.89 years, 60.9% were male and 53.1% had a right-sided mass. The comorbidities, body mass index, and performance scores were evenly distributed across the complexity groups ( > 0.05). The mean tumor size was 4.13 cm and the mean MRNS and RNS were 9.45 and 6.1, respectively. 60.9% of the cases had no complications. Major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade [CDG] 3+) were noted in five cases (7.8%). The trifecta of neargin, ischemia, and complications (MICs) score was achieved in 85.9% and was achieved in 71.9% of the cases. MRNS was found to be an independent predictor of the trifecta outcomes ( = 0.04). Receiver-operating characteristic curve of MRNS analyzing the major complications as per the CDG showed an area under the curve of. 804, indicating good prediction of complications by the MRNS.

CONCLUSIONS

MRNS improves the predicting power of RNS by attributing enhanced scores to key elements and by adding new elements. Also, MRNS has good ability to predict the achievement of the trifecta and MIC.

摘要

引言

肾计量评分(RNS)是一种对肾肿块复杂性进行分级的标准化系统,但它与开放性部分肾切除术(OPN)的围手术期结果相关性不佳。为克服这些缺点,人们提出了改良的RNS(MRNS)。在本研究中,我们评估了MRNS及其在预测OPN围手术期结果中的作用。

方法

这是一项在三级医疗中心进行的前瞻性观察性研究,旨在评估MRNS在预测OPN围手术期结果中的有效性。该研究纳入了64例病例。分析了人口统计学参数、肿瘤特征和围手术期结果。将与术后结果的相关性以及MRNS的优势与其他各种肾计量评分进行了比较。

结果

患者的平均年龄为52.89岁,60.9%为男性,53.1%的患者肿块位于右侧。合并症、体重指数和体能评分在不同复杂性组中分布均匀(>0.05)。平均肿瘤大小为4.13 cm,平均MRNS和RNS分别为9.45和6.1。60.9%的病例无并发症。5例(7.8%)出现严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo分级[CDG]3+)。85.9%的病例实现了切缘、缺血和并发症(MIC)三联征评分,71.9%的病例实现了该评分。发现MRNS是三联征结果的独立预测因素(=0.04)。MRNS根据CDG分析严重并发症的受试者工作特征曲线显示曲线下面积为0.804,表明MRNS对并发症有良好的预测能力。

结论

MRNS通过对关键要素赋予更高分数并添加新要素,提高了RNS的预测能力。此外,MRNS具有良好的预测三联征和MIC实现情况的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/10419784/2bdc7e5a0a94/IJU-39-202-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/10419784/377c830c8f80/IJU-39-202-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/10419784/2bdc7e5a0a94/IJU-39-202-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/10419784/377c830c8f80/IJU-39-202-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/50b6/10419784/2bdc7e5a0a94/IJU-39-202-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of modified RENAL nephrometry score in the prediction of perioperative outcomes of open partial nephrectomy.改良RENAL肾计量评分在预测开放性部分肾切除术围手术期结局中的应用评估
Indian J Urol. 2023 Jul-Sep;39(3):202-208. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_66_23. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
2
Predicting trifecta outcomes after robot-assisted nephron-sparing surgery: Beyond the nephrometry score.预测机器人辅助肾部分切除术的三联结局:超越肾肿瘤评分。
Investig Clin Urol. 2018 Sep;59(5):305-312. doi: 10.4111/icu.2018.59.5.305. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
3
Predicting Strict Trifecta Outcomes after Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison of RENAL, PADUA, and C-Index Scores.预测机器人辅助部分肾切除术后的严格三连胜结局:RENAL、帕多瓦和C指数评分的比较。
J Kidney Cancer VHL. 2021 Oct 1;8(4):1-12. doi: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v8i4.183. eCollection 2021.
4
RENAL nephrometry score: Predicting perioperative outcomes following open partial nephrectomy.肾计量评分:预测开放性肾部分切除术后的围手术期结局。
Urol Ann. 2019 Apr-Jun;11(2):187-192. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_93_18.
5
Management of high complexity renal masses in partial nephrectomy: A multicenter analysis.部分肾切除术治疗高复杂性肾肿瘤的管理:一项多中心分析。
Urol Oncol. 2019 Jul;37(7):437-444. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 16.
6
Trifecta Outcomes in Open, Laparoscopy or Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Does the Surgical Approach Matter?开放手术、腹腔镜手术或机器人辅助部分肾切除术的三连胜结局:手术方式重要吗?
J Kidney Cancer VHL. 2019 May 13;6(1):8-12. doi: 10.15586/jkcvhl.2019.115. eCollection 2019.
7
External validation of SPARE nephrometery score in predicting overall complications, trifecta and pentafecta outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.SPARE 肾部分切除术评分在外科学辅助部分肾切除术预测总体并发症、三联征和五联征结局中的验证。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022 Feb;74(1):63-71. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.20.03972-7. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
8
A novel nephrometry scoring system for predicting peri-operative outcomes of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.一种用于预测后腹腔镜部分肾切除术围手术期结局的新型肾脏分段评分系统。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 Mar 5;133(5):577-582. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000668.
9
A comparison of DAP and RENAL scoring systems in the achievement of trifecta in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.DAP评分系统与RENAL评分系统在腹腔镜肾部分切除术中实现三连胜方面的比较。
Urologia. 2022 Feb;89(1):94-99. doi: 10.1177/03915603211019981. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
10
Patient REnal and Tumor Attribute Score (PRETA Score): a comprehensive renal nephrometry score for use in patients with renal masses planned for minimally invasive nephron sparing surgery.患者肾脏和肿瘤属性评分(PRETA 评分):一个全面的肾脏肾单位切除术评分,用于计划进行微创保肾手术的肾肿块患者。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):1463-1470. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01389-7. Epub 2022 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Re: Kamath KA, Pothy VS, Pandey H. Evaluation of modified RENAL nephrometry score in the prediction of perioperative outcomes of open partial nephrectomy. Indian J Urol 2023;39:202-8.回复:卡马特·卡A、波西·V·S、潘迪·H。改良RENAL肾计量评分在预测开放性部分肾切除术围手术期结局中的评估。《印度泌尿外科杂志》2023年;39卷:202 - 208页
Indian J Urol. 2024 Jan-Mar;40(1):73-74. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_312_23. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
2
What's inside?里面有什么?
Indian J Urol. 2023 Jul-Sep;39(3):181-182. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_225_23. Epub 2023 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive Value of Nephrometry Scores in Nephron-sparing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.肾部分切除术的肾肿瘤评分的预测价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 May 15;6(3):490-504. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Nov 24.
2
Interdisciplinary Comparison of PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. Scoring Systems for Prediction of Conversion to Nephrectomy in Patients with Renal Mass Scheduled for Nephron Sparing Surgery.多学科比较PADUA 和 R.E.N.A.L. 评分系统在预测计划行保留肾单位手术的肾肿瘤患者中转行肾切除术的作用。
J Urol. 2019 Nov;202(5):890-898. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000361. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
3
Comparison of RENAL, PADUA, CSA, and PAVP Nephrometry Scores in Predicting Functional Outcomes After Partial Nephrectomy.
比较RENAL、帕多瓦、CSA和PAVP肾计量评分在预测部分肾切除术后功能结局中的作用。
Urology. 2019 Feb;124:160-167. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.03.055. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
4
The role of RENAL, PADUA and C-index scoring systems in predicting the results of partial nephrectomy without ischemia.RENAL、PADUA 和 C-index 评分系统在预测无缺血性部分肾切除术结果中的作用。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Jan;42(1):326-331. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
5
Comparison of RENAL, PADUA, and C-index scoring systems in predicting perioperative outcomes after nephron sparing surgery.肾保留手术围手术期结局预测中RENAL、PADUA和C指数评分系统的比较
Indian J Urol. 2018 Jan-Mar;34(1):51-55. doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_247_17.
6
Defining Renal Masses: Comprehensive Comparison of RENAL, PADUA, NePhRO, and C-Index Score.肾肿物的定义:RENAL、帕多瓦(PADUA)、NePhRO和C指数评分的综合比较
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Apr;15(2):248-255.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.07.029. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
7
R.E.N.A.L. Score Outperforms PADUA Score, C-Index and DAP Score for Outcome Prediction of Nephron Sparing Surgery in a Selected Cohort.RENAL 评分在选定队列中对保肾手术结果预测的表现优于 PADUA 评分、C 指数和 DAP 评分。
J Urol. 2016 Sep;196(3):664-71. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.176. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
8
Nephrometry scoring systems for surgical decision-making in nephron-sparing surgery.用于保留肾单位手术中手术决策的肾测量评分系统。
Curr Opin Urol. 2014 Sep;24(5):437-40. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000085.
9
Internal validation of the renal pelvic score: a novel marker of renal pelvic anatomy that predicts urine leak after partial nephrectomy.肾盂评分的内部验证:一种新的肾盂解剖标志物,可预测部分肾切除术后尿漏。
Urology. 2014 Aug;84(2):351-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
10
Renal pelvic anatomy is associated with incidence, grade, and need for intervention for urine leak following partial nephrectomy.肾盂解剖结构与部分肾切除术后尿漏的发生率、分级和干预需求相关。
Eur Urol. 2014 Nov;66(5):949-55. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Oct 26.