• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于铂类的同期化疗仍然是鼻咽癌的最佳治疗方案:来自流行地区的大型机构队列研究。

Platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy remains the optimal regimen for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a large institutional-based cohort study from an endemic area.

机构信息

Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov;144(11):2231-2243. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2721-6. Epub 2018 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00432-018-2721-6
PMID:30109501
Abstract

PURPOSE

To retrospectively investigate the optimal regimen of concurrent chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) by comparing clinical outcomes of patients who received platinum-based and non-platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) regimens.

METHODS

Based on a prospectively maintained database from 1998 to 2013 in an endemic area, a total of 4608 newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven, and non-disseminated NPC patients were identified and allocated into three cohorts based on concurrent chemotherapy regimens: cisplatin-based (CP) chemotherapy cohort, other platinum-based (OP) chemotherapy cohort, and non-platinum-based (NP) chemotherapy cohort. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score analysis of treatment using an inverse probability weighting model (PSA/IPTW). Finally, sensitivity analysis estimated the effects of potential unmeasured confounders.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 68.5 months (range 2-194 months). The multivariate Cox model showed that NP regimens were significantly related with worse survival compared with CP or OP regimens (OS: HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.16-2.00, P = 0.002; HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.24-2.27, P = 0.001; DFS: HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.03-1.66, P = 0.031; HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.14-1.97, P = 0.004, respectively). Meanwhile, no significant survival difference was found between OP and CP regimens. The PSA/IPTW method, CCRT-specific and III-IVB NPC cohort subgroup analysis showed similar results. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of our results.

CONCLUSIONS

Platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy, including both CP and OP regimens, yields better survival benefits for non-metastatic NPC patients than the NP regimen and remains the optimal regimen for these patients.

摘要

目的

通过比较接受铂类和非铂类同期放化疗(CCRT)方案的患者的临床结果,回顾性研究鼻咽癌(NPC)的最佳同期化疗方案。

方法

根据 1998 年至 2013 年在一个流行地区前瞻性维护的数据库,共确定了 4608 例新诊断、经活检证实和非播散的 NPC 患者,并根据同期化疗方案分为三组:顺铂为基础(CP)化疗组、其他铂类(OP)化疗组和非铂类(NP)化疗组。使用 Cox 比例风险模型和逆概率加权模型(PSA/IPTW)对治疗的倾向评分分析来估计总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)。最后,敏感性分析估计了潜在未测量混杂因素的影响。

结果

中位随访时间为 68.5 个月(范围 2-194 个月)。多变量 Cox 模型显示,NP 方案与 CP 或 OP 方案相比,生存明显较差(OS:HR 1.51,95%CI 1.16-2.00,P=0.002;HR 1.68,95%CI 1.24-2.27,P=0.001;DFS:HR 1.31,95%CI 1.03-1.66,P=0.031;HR 1.50,95%CI 1.14-1.97,P=0.004)。同时,OP 和 CP 方案之间的生存差异无统计学意义。PSA/IPTW 方法、CCRT 特异性和 III-IVB NPC 亚组分析也得出了相似的结果。敏感性分析证实了我们结果的稳健性。

结论

对于非转移性 NPC 患者,铂类同期化疗,包括 CP 和 OP 方案,比 NP 方案具有更好的生存获益,仍是这些患者的最佳方案。

相似文献

1
Platinum-based concurrent chemotherapy remains the optimal regimen for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a large institutional-based cohort study from an endemic area.基于铂类的同期化疗仍然是鼻咽癌的最佳治疗方案:来自流行地区的大型机构队列研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov;144(11):2231-2243. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2721-6. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
2
Induction chemotherapy plus IMRT alone versus induction chemotherapy plus IMRT-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.局部晚期鼻咽癌诱导化疗加 IMRT 与诱导化疗加基于 IMRT 的同期放化疗的回顾性队列研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul;145(7):1857-1864. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-02925-z. Epub 2019 May 6.
3
Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus docetaxel and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma from non-endemic area of China.吉西他滨和顺铂与多西他赛和顺铂作为诱导化疗,随后在非中国鼻咽癌高发地区进行同期放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep;146(9):2369-2378. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03229-3. Epub 2020 May 3.
4
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.晚期胃癌的化疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 29;8(8):CD004064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004064.pub4.
5
Platinum-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer.转移性乳腺癌的含铂方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 23;6(6):CD003374. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003374.pub4.
6
Comparison of TPF and PF induction chemotherapy combined with cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.TPF与PF诱导化疗联合顺铂同步放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的比较:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jan 17;104(3):e41278. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041278.
7
A Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone and radiotherapy alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.贝叶斯网状meta 分析比较局部晚期鼻咽癌患者同步放化疗后辅助化疗、单纯同步放化疗和单纯放疗的疗效。
Ann Oncol. 2015 Jan;26(1):205-211. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu507. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
8
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
9
Induction chemotherapy plus concomitant chemoradiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An updated network meta-analysis.诱导化疗联合同期放化疗治疗鼻咽癌:一项更新的网络荟萃分析。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021 Apr;160:103244. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103244. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
10
Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer.根治性子宫切除术联合放化疗与单纯根治性子宫切除术治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的疗效比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 22;8(8):CD010260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010260.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Raltitrexed versus 5-fluorouracil with cisplatin and concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An open labeled, randomized, controlled, and multicenter clinical trial.雷替曲塞对比 5-氟尿嘧啶联合顺铂同期放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌:一项开放标签、随机、对照、多中心临床试验。
Cancer Med. 2020 Sep;9(17):6166-6172. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3260. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
2
DW-MRI-Guided Dose Escalation Improves Local Control of Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated with Chemoradiotherapy.扩散加权磁共振成像引导下的剂量递增改善了局部晚期鼻咽癌放化疗的局部控制。
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 May 6;12:3107-3116. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S239033. eCollection 2020.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin versus cisplatin in stage II-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial.同期放化疗联合奈达铂与顺铂治疗 II-IVB 期鼻咽癌:一项开放标签、非劣效性、随机 3 期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):461-473. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30104-9. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
2
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Head and Neck Cancers, Version 2.2017.NCCN 指南解读:头颈部肿瘤,第 2.2017 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Jun;15(6):761-770. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0101.
3
Safety and efficacy of lobaplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil as first-line induction chemotherapy followed by lobaplatin-radiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: preliminary results of a prospective phase II trial.
MiRNAs in Radiotherapy Resistance of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.
微小RNA与鼻咽癌放疗抵抗
J Cancer. 2020 Apr 6;11(13):3976-3985. doi: 10.7150/jca.42734. eCollection 2020.
4
Role of concurrent chemoradiation on locally advanced unresectable adenoid cystic carcinoma.同期放化疗在局部晚期不可切除腺样囊性癌中的作用。
Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Jan;36(1):175-181. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2019.104. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
洛铂联合5-氟尿嘧啶作为一线诱导化疗随后进行洛铂-放疗用于局部晚期鼻咽癌的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性II期试验的初步结果
BMC Cancer. 2017 Feb 15;17(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3080-4.
4
Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.诱导化疗加同期放化疗对比单纯同期放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌:一项 3 期、多中心、随机对照临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Nov;17(11):1509-1520. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30410-7. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
5
Propensity score matching analysis of cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy in low risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era.调强放射治疗时代基于顺铂的同步化疗在低危鼻咽癌中的倾向评分匹配分析
Oncotarget. 2015 Dec 22;6(41):44019-29. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5806.
6
Management of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Current Practice and Future Perspective.鼻咽癌的治疗:现状与展望。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 10;33(29):3356-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.9347. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
7
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma.鼻咽癌。
Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):1012-1024. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00055-0. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
8
Efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent carboplatin in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.调强放疗联合顺铂治疗鼻咽癌的疗效
Radiol Oncol. 2015 Mar 25;49(2):155-62. doi: 10.2478/raon-2014-0044. eCollection 2015 Jun.
9
Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the MAC-NPC meta-analysis.鼻咽癌的化学治疗与放射治疗:MAC-NPC 荟萃分析更新。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jun;16(6):645-55. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70126-9. Epub 2015 May 6.
10
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma incidence and mortality in China in 2010.2010年中国鼻咽癌的发病率和死亡率。
Chin J Cancer. 2014 Aug;33(8):381-7. doi: 10.5732/cjc.014.10086.