What Can Apologies in the Electronic Health Record Tell Us About Health Care Quality, Processes, and Safety?

INTRODUCTION

Apologizing to patients is an encouraged practice, yet little is known about how and why providers apologize and what insights apologies could provide in improving quality and safety.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine whether provider apologies in the electronic health record could identify patient safety concerns and opportunities for improvement.

METHODS

After performing a free-text search, we randomly selected 100 clinical notes from 1685 available containing terminology related to apology. We categorized the reason for apology, presence and classification of medical error, level of patient harm, and practice improvement opportunities. We compared patient events discovered from apologies in the medical record to standard patient incident report logs.

RESULTS

Of 100 randomly selected apologies, 37 were related to a delay in care, 14 to misunderstanding, 11 to access to care, and 8 to information technology. For apologies related to delay, the median delay was 6 days (mean = 8.9, range = 0-41). Twenty-four (65%) of the 37 delays were related to diagnostic testing.Medical errors were associated with 46 (46%) of the 100 apologies. Sixty-four (64%) of the 100 apologies were associated with actionable opportunities for improvement. These opportunities were classified into 37 discrete issues across 8 broad categories. When apology review was compared with standard incident report logs, 27 (73%) of the 37 discrete issues identified by patient apology review were not found in incident reporting; both methods identified similar rates of patient harm.

CONCLUSIONS

Review of apologies in the electronic health record can identify patient safety concerns and improvement opportunities not apparent through standard incident reporting.