• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"If your feelings were hurt, I'm sorry…": How Third-Year Medical Students Observe, Learn From, and Engage in Apologies.“如果你的感受受到了伤害,我很抱歉……”:三年级医学生如何观察、学习和参与道歉。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 May;36(5):1352-1358. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06263-6. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
2
The Role of Apology Laws in Medical Malpractice.道歉法在医疗事故中的作用。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2021 Sep;49(3):406-414. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.200107-20. Epub 2021 May 19.
3
Teaching medical error apologies: development of a multi-component intervention.医学错误道歉教学:多成分干预措施的开发
Fam Med. 2011 Jun;43(6):400-6.
4
"Sorry” Is Never Enough: How State Apology Laws Fail to Reduce Medical Malpractice Liability Risk.“抱歉”远远不够:州道歉法如何未能降低医疗事故赔偿责任风险。
Stanford Law Rev. 2019 Feb;71(2):341-409.
5
Sorry, Not Sorry: Effects of Different Types of Apologies and Self-Monitoring on Non-verbal Behaviors.抱歉,但不抱歉:不同类型的道歉和自我监控对非语言行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 26;12:689615. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689615. eCollection 2021.
6
Physician gender and apologies in clinical interactions.医生性别与临床互动中的道歉。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 May;101(5):836-842. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
7
The power of apology.道歉的力量。
N Z Med J. 2009 Oct 9;122(1304):96-106.
8
Apologies and medical error.道歉与医疗差错。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Feb;467(2):376-82. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0580-1. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
9
A fair dinkum duty of open disclosure following medical error.医疗差错后真诚的公开告知义务。
J Law Med. 2012 Sep;20(1):35-43.
10
New Hong Kong statute protects factual statements in medical apologies from use in litigation.香港新法规保护医疗道歉中的事实陈述不被用于诉讼。
Med Leg J. 2018 Dec;86(4):198-201. doi: 10.1177/0025817218771803. Epub 2018 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The power and pain of words: how language matters in responding to patients after harm.言语的力量与伤痛:伤害患者后语言在回应中的重要性
Front Health Serv. 2025 Feb 13;5:1513670. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1513670. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychology insights on apologizing to patients.关于向患者道歉的心理学见解。
J Hosp Med. 2025 Aug;20(8):878-881. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13585. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
3
Scholars in Health Equity: A Program of Structured Physician Faculty Development.健康公平领域的学者:结构化医师师资发展项目
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jun;40(8):1797-1802. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09281-w. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
4
Personalizing the BioPsychoSocial Approach: "Add-Ons" and "Add-Ins" in Generalist Practice.个性化生物心理社会方法:全科医疗实践中的“附加项”和“插入项”
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 24;12:716486. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.716486. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Minding the Form That Transforms: Using Kegan's Model of Adult Development to Understand Personal and Professional Identity Formation in Medicine.关注转型的形式:利用凯根的成人发展模型理解医学领域中的个人和专业身份形成。
Acad Med. 2019 Sep;94(9):1299-1304. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002741.
2
"Sorry” Is Never Enough: How State Apology Laws Fail to Reduce Medical Malpractice Liability Risk.“抱歉”远远不够:州道歉法如何未能降低医疗事故赔偿责任风险。
Stanford Law Rev. 2019 Feb;71(2):341-409.
3
Effects Of A Communication-And-Resolution Program On Hospitals' Malpractice Claims And Costs.沟通与和解方案对医院医疗事故索赔和成本的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Nov;37(11):1836-1844. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0720.
4
The "Seven Pillars" Response to Patient Safety Incidents: Effects on Medical Liability Processes and Outcomes.对患者安全事件的“七支柱”应对措施:对医疗责任程序及结果的影响
Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):2491-2515. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12548. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
5
Not all stories of professional identity formation are equal: An analysis of formation narratives of highly humanistic physicians.并非所有关于职业身份形成的故事都是相同的:对高度人文主义医生的形成叙事的分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Aug;99(8):1394-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.03.018. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
6
Reframing medical education to support professional identity formation.重塑医学教育以支持职业身份形成。
Acad Med. 2014 Nov;89(11):1446-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000427.
7
Teaching medical error disclosure to physicians-in-training: a scoping review.医学差错披露教学:综述
Acad Med. 2013 Jun;88(6):884-92. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828f898f.
8
Efficacy of a physician's words of empathy: an overview of state apology laws.医生共情话语的功效:州道歉法概述
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2012 May;112(5):302-6. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2012.112.5.302.
9
Teaching medical error apologies: development of a multi-component intervention.医学错误道歉教学:多成分干预措施的开发
Fam Med. 2011 Jun;43(6):400-6.
10
Decoding the learning environment of medical education: a hidden curriculum perspective for faculty development.解码医学教育的学习环境:教师发展的隐性课程视角。
Acad Med. 2011 Apr;86(4):440-4. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820df8e2.

“如果你的感受受到了伤害,我很抱歉……”:三年级医学生如何观察、学习和参与道歉。

"If your feelings were hurt, I'm sorry…": How Third-Year Medical Students Observe, Learn From, and Engage in Apologies.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2021 May;36(5):1352-1358. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06263-6. Epub 2020 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-020-06263-6
PMID:33034017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8131483/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Apologies may play a significant role in medical care, especially in the context of patient safety, medical error disclosure, and malpractice. Studies have shown that when state laws, institutional policies, and individual skills align-including the ability to offer a sincere apology-patients and families benefit. However, little is known about how, and under what conditions, physicians offer apologies in day-to-day care. Even less is known about what medical students learn about apologies from observing their superiors in these settings.

OBJECTIVE

Characterize third-year medical students' experiences of observing and engaging in apologies.

DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive analysis of student professionalism narratives.

PARTICIPANTS

Third-year medical students at Indiana University School of Medicine.

APPROACH

A search of 7,384 unique narratives yielded 238 with apologies. A rubric based on four key elements of genuine apologies ((1) acknowledgement, (2) explanation, (3) regret/remorse, and (4) reparation) was used to classify the kind of apology offered. Apology completeness, impact, and timing were also coded.

KEY RESULTS

Seventeen percent of all apologies were complete (i.e., contained all four elements). Over 40% were coded as incomplete or "non-apology" apologies (i.e., those with only the first two elements). A significant relationship between apology completeness and positive student experience was found. Most apologies were offered by the attending physician or resident to patients and family members. Students were generally positive about their experiences, but one in five were coded as negative. Some students were distressed enough to offer apologies on behalf of the faculty. Apology timing did not make a significant difference in terms of student experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Few education programs target apologies in the context of routine practice. With little formal instruction, students may rely on adopting what their seniors do. Faculty have an important role to play in modeling the apology process when harms-both great and small-occur.

摘要

背景

道歉在医疗保健中可能发挥重要作用,尤其是在患者安全、医疗错误披露和医疗事故的背景下。研究表明,当州法律、机构政策和个人技能一致时——包括提供真诚道歉的能力——患者和家属将受益。然而,人们对医生在日常护理中如何道歉以及在什么条件下道歉知之甚少。对于医学生在这些环境中通过观察上级学习道歉了解多少,知之甚少。

目的

描述三年级医学生观察和参与道歉的经历。

设计

对学生职业道德叙事的定性描述性分析。

参与者

印第安纳大学医学院的三年级医学生。

方法

对 7384 条独特叙事进行搜索,得到 238 条包含道歉的叙事。使用真诚道歉的四个关键要素((1)承认,(2)解释,(3)遗憾/悔恨,和(4)赔偿)的分类准则来对道歉的种类进行分类。还对道歉的完整性、影响和时机进行了编码。

主要结果

所有道歉中有 17%是完整的(即包含所有四个要素)。超过 40%的道歉被归类为不完整或“非道歉”(即只包含前两个要素)。发现道歉的完整性与积极的学生体验之间存在显著关系。大多数道歉是主治医生或住院医师向患者和家属提出的。学生们普遍对自己的经历持积极态度,但有五分之一的学生表示消极。一些学生感到非常不安,以至于代表教师提出道歉。道歉的时机在学生体验方面没有显著差异。

结论

很少有教育项目针对常规实践中的道歉。由于缺乏正式的指导,学生可能依赖于模仿上级的做法。在发生重大和微小伤害时,教师在道歉过程中发挥着重要作用。