Ögmundsdottir Michelsen Halldora, Nilsson Marie, Scherstén Fredrik, Sjölin Ingela, Schiopu Alexandru, Leosdottir Margret
Department of Coronary Disease, Skåne University Hospital, Inga Marie Nilsson gata 47, Malmö, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Box 117, SE-221 00, Lund, Sweden.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Aug 15;18(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0907-0.
Cardiac rehabilitation improves prognosis after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), however, the optimal method of implementation is unknown. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of individually-tailored, nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation on patient outcomes.
This single-centre retrospective observational study included 217 patients (62 ± 9 years, 73% men). All patients attended cardiac rehabilitation including at least two follow-up consultations with a nurse. Patients receiving traditional care (n = 105) had a routine cardiologist consultation, while for those receiving tailored care (n = 112) their need for a cardiologist consultation was individually evaluated by the nurses. Regression analysis was used to analyse risk factor control and hospital readmissions at one year.
Patients in the tailored group achieved better control of total cholesterol (- 0.1 vs + 0.4 mmol/L change between baseline (time of index event) and 12-14-month follow-up, (p = 0.01), LDL cholesterol (- 0.1 vs + 0.2 mmol/L, p = 0.02) and systolic blood pressure (- 2.1 vs + 4.3 mmHg, p = 0.01). Active smokers, at baseline, were more often smoke-free at one-year in the tailored group [OR 0.32 (0.1-1.0), p = 0.05]. There was a no significant difference in re-admissions during the first year of follow-up. In the tailored group 60% of the patients had a cardiologist consultation compared to 98% in the traditional group (p < 0.001). The number of nurse visits was the same in both groups, while the number of telephone contacts was 38% higher in the tailored group (p = 0.02).
A tailored, nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation programme can improve risk factor management in post-AMI patients.
心脏康复可改善急性心肌梗死(AMI)后的预后,然而,最佳实施方法尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估由护士主导的个性化心脏康复对患者预后的影响。
这项单中心回顾性观察性研究纳入了217例患者(62±9岁,73%为男性)。所有患者均接受心脏康复,包括至少两次与护士的随访咨询。接受传统护理的患者(n = 105)接受常规心脏病专家会诊,而接受个性化护理的患者(n = 112),护士会对他们是否需要心脏病专家会诊进行个体评估。采用回归分析来分析一年时的危险因素控制情况和再次入院情况。
个性化护理组患者在总胆固醇控制方面表现更佳(基线(索引事件发生时)至12 - 14个月随访期间变化为 - 0.1 vs + 0.4 mmol/L,(p = 0.01)),低密度脂蛋白胆固醇( - 0.1 vs + 0.2 mmol/L,p = 0.02)和收缩压( - 2.1 vs + 4.3 mmHg,p = 0.01)。在基线时为主动吸烟者,在个性化护理组中一年时更常戒烟[比值比0.32(0.1 - 1.0),p = 0.05]。随访第一年的再次入院率无显著差异。个性化护理组60%的患者接受了心脏病专家会诊,而传统护理组为98%(p < 0.001)。两组的护士访视频次相同,而个性化护理组的电话联系次数高出38%(p = 0.02)。
由护士主导的个性化心脏康复计划可改善AMI后患者的危险因素管理。