Liu Zhenqing, Jiang Menglu, Xu Tongsheng, Hua Hao
Department of Anesthesiology, The Ninth People's Hospital of Wuxi, No.999 Liangxi Road, Wuxi, 214062, China.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Aug 16;18(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0570-0.
This randomized controlled study investigated the analgesic effect of ropivacaine in combination with dexmedetomidine versus ropivacaine alone on brachial plexus block to provide alternative anesthetic means for upper limb trauma surgery.
Totally 114 patients who received upper limb surgeries under brachial plexus block anesthesia in our hospital from February 2013 to July 2015 were enrolled. The patients were randomized to ropivacaine alone (the control group) or ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine (the combination group). The blocking effect on sensory and motor neurons, visual analog scale (VAS) score, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SPO) and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.
The time to onset of sensory and motor nerve blockade was significantly shorter in the combination group than in the control group (8.9 min vs. 12.4 min for sensation blockade; 7.5 min vs. 12.8 min for motor blockade, P < 0.05 for both comparisons), and the duration of the blockade was significantly longer in the combination group (590.2 min vs. 532.1 min, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups immediately and 4 h after surgery; however, 8, 12 and 24 h after surgery, the VAS scores were all significantly lower in the combination group than the control group (2.4 vs. 3.0 for 8 h; 2.2 vs. 4.2 for 12 h, and 2.1 vs. 5.4 for 24 h, respectively, P < 0.05 for all comparisons). There was no statistical difference in HR, MAP and SPO between the two groups before anesthesia, but after anesthesia, the MAP and HR were significantly lower, and the SPO was significantly higher in the combination group than the control group (78 vs. 84 for MAP; 72 vs. 79 for HR; and 95.1 vs. 88.2 for SPO, P < 0.05 for all comparisons). The rates of adverse reaction was significantly lower in the combination group than the control group (3.6 vs. 7.2, P < 0.05).
The brachial plexus blocking effect of ropivacaine combined with dexmedetomidine was superior to that of ropivacaine alone, mainly intra-operatively and postoperatively.
Analgesic Effect of Ropivacaine Combined with Dexmedetomidine on Brachial Plexus Block, ChiCTR1800017372, retrospectively registered on July 26, 2018.
本随机对照研究探讨了罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定与单纯罗哌卡因用于臂丛神经阻滞的镇痛效果,为上肢创伤手术提供替代麻醉方法。
选取2013年2月至2015年7月在我院接受臂丛神经阻滞麻醉下行上肢手术的114例患者。将患者随机分为单纯罗哌卡因组(对照组)和罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定组(联合组)。比较两组对感觉和运动神经元的阻滞效果、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、外周毛细血管血氧饱和度(SPO)及不良反应。
联合组感觉和运动神经阻滞起效时间显著短于对照组(感觉阻滞:8.9分钟对12.4分钟;运动阻滞:7.5分钟对12.8分钟,两组比较P均<0.05),且联合组阻滞持续时间显著长于对照组(590.2分钟对532.1分钟,P<0.05)。两组术后即刻及术后4小时VAS评分无显著差异;然而,术后8、12和24小时,联合组VAS评分均显著低于对照组(8小时:2.4对3.0;12小时:2.2对4.2;24小时:2.1对5.4,所有比较P<0.05)。两组麻醉前HR、MAP和SPO无统计学差异,但麻醉后,联合组MAP和HR显著降低,SPO显著高于对照组(MAP:78对84;HR:72对79;SPO:95.1对88.2,所有比较P<0.05)。联合组不良反应发生率显著低于对照组(3.6对7.2,P<0.05)。
罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定的臂丛神经阻滞效果优于单纯罗哌卡因,主要体现在术中和术后。
罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定对臂丛神经阻滞的镇痛效果,ChiCTR1800017372,于2018年7月26日进行回顾性注册。