• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年腰椎管狭窄症的微创减压与物理治疗

Minimally Invasive Decompression and Physiotherapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Geriatric Patients.

作者信息

Hoffman Haydn, Bennett Shelley S, Li Charles H, Haakana Piia, Lu Daniel C

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Los Angeles.

Department of Physical Therapy, University of California, Los Angeles.

出版信息

Cureus. 2018 Jun 11;10(6):e2785. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2785.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.2785
PMID:30112261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6089476/
Abstract

Background Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most common indication for spine surgery among the geriatric population. Although decompressive surgery is effective, older patients do not benefit as much as younger patients, and they are frequently excluded from studies assessing postoperative physiotherapy. We sought to evaluate the long-term outcomes after surgery when a novel postoperative physiotherapy regimen was included. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients with LSS greater than 70 years old who underwent lumbar decompressive surgery by the senior author over the past five years. We evaluated patients who participated in a novel postoperative physiotherapy regimen involving four phases of rehabilitation aimed at progressively independent ambulation. The visual analog scale (VAS), lower extremity motor strength, and functional independence measure (FIM) were collected preoperatively and after physiotherapy to measure outcomes. Results Ten consecutive patients with an average age of 83 years (range: 71 - 96) met the inclusion criteria. Nine patients underwent minimally invasive laminotomies at L4-L5 and one underwent a laminotomy at L3-L4. The average follow-up time was 41.9 months. The preoperative mean VAS was 7.35, and at the end of the study, it was 1.7 (p = 0.005). Three of the four patients with preoperative motor deficits improved. The median transfer and locomotion subscores of the FIM were six preoperatively and increased to seven postoperatively. Neither of these improvements was significant. Conclusions Patients older than 70 years undergoing decompressive surgery and a novel postoperative physiotherapy regimen experienced significant reductions in pain. Independence also increased; however, this did not reach statistical significance.

摘要

背景 腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)是老年人群中脊柱手术最常见的适应症。尽管减压手术有效,但老年患者获益程度不如年轻患者,并且他们经常被排除在评估术后物理治疗的研究之外。我们试图评估纳入一种新型术后物理治疗方案后的手术长期疗效。方法 我们对过去五年中由资深作者为年龄大于70岁的腰椎管狭窄症患者进行腰椎减压手术的情况进行了回顾性研究。我们评估了参与一种新型术后物理治疗方案的患者,该方案包括四个康复阶段,旨在逐步实现独立行走。术前和物理治疗后收集视觉模拟量表(VAS)、下肢肌力和功能独立性测量(FIM)以评估疗效。结果 连续10例平均年龄83岁(范围:71 - 96岁)的患者符合纳入标准。9例患者在L4 - L5行微创椎板切开术,1例在L3 - L4行椎板切开术。平均随访时间为41.9个月。术前平均VAS为7.35,研究结束时为1.7(p = 0.005)。术前有运动功能障碍的4例患者中有3例有所改善。FIM的转移和移动亚评分中位数术前为6分,术后增至7分。这些改善均无统计学意义。结论 年龄大于70岁的患者接受减压手术和新型术后物理治疗方案后疼痛明显减轻。独立性也有所提高;然而,这未达到统计学意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc8/6089476/4db686fecc75/cureus-0010-00000002785-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc8/6089476/7233b69fc7df/cureus-0010-00000002785-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc8/6089476/b4151d8a8543/cureus-0010-00000002785-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc8/6089476/4db686fecc75/cureus-0010-00000002785-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc8/6089476/7233b69fc7df/cureus-0010-00000002785-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc8/6089476/b4151d8a8543/cureus-0010-00000002785-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fc8/6089476/4db686fecc75/cureus-0010-00000002785-i03.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimally Invasive Decompression and Physiotherapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Geriatric Patients.老年腰椎管狭窄症的微创减压与物理治疗
Cureus. 2018 Jun 11;10(6):e2785. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2785.
2
Long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral laminotomy or total laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-institution experience.双侧椎板切开术或全椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的长期临床疗效:单中心经验。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E2. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18651.
3
Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy. A new endoscopic approach for spinal stenosis decompression.冲洗式内镜减压椎板切除术。一种用于脊柱狭窄减压的新内镜手术方法。
Spine J. 2015 Oct 1;15(10):2282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
4
A comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomies for decompression of L4-L5 spinal stenosis.L4-L5 椎管狭窄症减压的单侧和双侧椎板切开术比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Feb 1;36(3):E172-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181db998c.
5
Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.腰椎管狭窄症减压性椎板切除术的结果:微创单侧双侧减压椎板切除术与开放椎板切除术的比较:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Aug;21(2):179-86. doi: 10.3171/2014.4.SPINE13420. Epub 2014 May 30.
6
Comparison of full-endoscopic and minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in the setting of degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.全内窥镜与微创减压治疗退行性脊柱侧凸与脊柱滑脱伴腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E16. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS195.
7
Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.经旁正中或中线入路在内镜手术辅助下行L4/5节段腰椎管狭窄症的管状手术。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 May-Aug;26(2):2309499018782546. doi: 10.1177/2309499018782546.
8
Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery.三种微创减压手术治疗腰椎中央型狭窄的对比分析:双通道内镜、单通道内镜和显微镜手术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E9. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS197.
9
Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.有或无术前椎体滑脱患者行微创腰椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及再次手术率
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Apr;22(4):339-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.SPINE13597. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
10
Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.微创后路经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的长期耐久性:临床及影像学随访
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):288-96. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9a60a.

引用本文的文献

1
A Holistic Approach to Physiotherapy Treatment for Scheuermann Disease Along With Lumbar Canal Stenosis and Bilateral Lower Limb Radiculopathy: A Case Report.针对休门氏病合并腰椎管狭窄症及双侧下肢神经根病的物理治疗整体方法:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Aug 5;16(8):e66194. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66194. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
The Role of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgical Procedures in the Elderly Patient: An Analysis of 49 Patients Between 75 and 95 Years of Age.微创脊柱外科手术在老年患者中的作用:对49例75至95岁患者的分析
Cureus. 2020 Mar 4;12(3):e7180. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7180.

本文引用的文献

1
Adherence support strategies for exercise interventions in people with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: A systematic review.轻度认知障碍和痴呆患者运动干预的依从性支持策略:一项系统综述。
Prev Med Rep. 2017 May 18;7:38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.05.007. eCollection 2017 Sep.
2
A qualitative study of older people's experience of living with neurogenic claudication to inform the development of a physiotherapy intervention.一项关于老年人神经源性间歇性跛行生活体验的定性研究,以指导物理治疗干预措施的制定。
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 May;39(10):1009-1017. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1177611. Epub 2016 May 23.
3
Lumbar Surgery in the Elderly Provides Significant Health Benefit in the US Health Care System: Patient-Reported Outcomes in 4370 Patients From the N2QOD Registry.
在美国医疗保健系统中,老年腰椎手术可带来显著的健康益处:来自N2QOD注册中心的4370例患者的患者报告结局
Neurosurgery. 2015 Oct;77 Suppl 4:S125-35. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000952.
4
Surgery versus nonsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized trial.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗与非手术治疗:一项随机试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Apr 7;162(7):465-73. doi: 10.7326/M14-1420.
5
Is rehabilitation intervention during hospitalization enough for functional improvements in patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery? A prospective randomized controlled study.腰椎减压手术患者在住院期间进行康复干预对功能改善是否足够?一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Feb;129 Suppl 1:S41-6. doi: 10.1016/S0303-8467(15)30011-1.
6
Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis in the octogenarian population: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) data.80 岁以上人群腰椎管狭窄症和退行性腰椎滑脱症手术治疗的疗效:脊柱患者结局研究试验(SPORT)数据分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Feb 4;97(3):177-85. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00313.
7
Rehabilitation following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. A Cochrane review.腰椎管狭窄症手术后的康复。一项Cochrane系统评价。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jun 1;39(13):1044-54. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000355.
8
Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery.腰椎间盘手术后的康复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 14;2014(3):CD003007. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003007.pub3.
9
Elderly patients have similar outcomes compared to younger patients after minimally invasive surgery for spinal stenosis.老年患者微创治疗脊柱狭窄术后的结局与年轻患者相似。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1824-30. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3411-y.
10
Aquatic therapy improves pain, disability, quality of life, body composition and fitness in sedentary adults with chronic low back pain. A controlled clinical trial.水疗可改善患有慢性下腰痛的久坐不动成年人的疼痛、残疾状况、生活质量、身体成分和健康状况。一项对照临床试验。
Clin Rehabil. 2014 Apr;28(4):350-60. doi: 10.1177/0269215513504943. Epub 2013 Oct 31.