Soliman Hesham Magdi
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, 21A Abdelaziz Al Seoud, Manial-EL Roda, Cairo, Egypt.
Spine J. 2015 Oct 1;15(10):2282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
The classic surgical treatment of spinal stenosis involves bilateral dissection of paraspinal muscles to expose all the involved levels, wide laminectomy, and medial facetectomy and foraminotomy. The surgical morbidity of the procedure is further magnified by being more common in elderly with associated medical comorbidities and being usually global involving multiple levels. To address this problem, several less invasive techniques have been introduced over the past decade including the microendoscopic decompression.
The aim was to describe and evaluate a new endoscopic technique for lumbar spinal canal decompression named irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy.
This was a technical report.
One hundred four consecutive patients suffering from neurogenic claudication and resistant to 3 months of conservative management were included in the study. Grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis and degenerative scoliosis were not considered a contraindication. Patients with segmental instability and predominant low back pain were excluded.
Primary outcome measures included the final functional outcome using modified Macnab criteria and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). In addition, the operative time and complication rate have been evaluated. Secondary outcome measures included the evaluation of the early postoperative course using visual analog scale for postoperative incisional pain, time for ambulation, and length of hospital stay.
Two 0.5-cm portals were used, one for the endoscope and the other for instruments. For every additional level, one portal is added. The endoscope and instruments are directly placed over the surface of lamina without any dissection, and saline under pump pressure is used to open a potential working space. Unilateral laminotomy/laminectomy is performed according to the severity of stenosis, followed by bilateral decompression beneath the midline structures.
Mean follow-up period was 28 months. The final outcome was excellent in 63%, good in 24%, fair in 9%, and poor in 4%. The preoperative ODI dropped from a mean of 64.2±10.0 to 23.1±20.8 postoperatively. Complications were limited to six cases of dural tear, which required no open conversion.
Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy allows the surgeon to safely perform effective central and foraminal decompression resulting in satisfactory midterm clinical results. Substituting long surgical incisions with 0.5-cm stabs and direct placement of instruments without dissection or dilatation could result in an improved postoperative course, shortened time for hospitalization, and reduced infection rate. However, still multicenter studies and randomized trials are needed before making final conclusions.
脊柱狭窄的经典手术治疗包括双侧分离椎旁肌以暴露所有受累节段,广泛椎板切除术、内侧关节突切除术和椎间孔切开术。由于该手术在伴有合并症的老年人中更常见且通常累及多个节段,其手术发病率进一步增加。为了解决这个问题,在过去十年中引入了几种侵入性较小的技术,包括显微内镜减压术。
旨在描述和评估一种名为冲洗内镜减压椎板切开术的新型内镜技术用于腰椎管减压。
这是一份技术报告。
连续104例患有神经源性间歇性跛行且对3个月保守治疗无效的患者纳入研究。I级退行性椎体滑脱和退行性脊柱侧凸不被视为禁忌证。排除有节段性不稳定和以腰痛为主的患者。
主要结果指标包括使用改良Macnab标准和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评估最终功能结果。此外,还评估了手术时间和并发症发生率。次要结果指标包括使用视觉模拟量表评估术后早期病程,评估术后切口疼痛、下床活动时间和住院时间。
使用两个0.5厘米的切口,一个用于放置内镜,另一个用于器械操作。每增加一个节段,增加一个切口。内镜和器械直接放置在椎板表面,无需任何分离,利用泵压下的生理盐水打开一个潜在的工作空间。根据狭窄的严重程度进行单侧椎板切开术/椎板切除术,然后在中线结构下方进行双侧减压。
平均随访期为28个月。最终结果优者占63%,良者占24%,可者占9%,差者占4%。术前ODI平均从64.2±10.0降至术后的23.1±20.8。并发症仅限于6例硬膜撕裂,无需开放转换手术。
冲洗内镜减压椎板切开术使外科医生能够安全地进行有效的中央和椎间孔减压,中期临床结果令人满意。用0.5厘米的切口代替长手术切口,直接放置器械而无需分离或扩张,可能会改善术后病程,缩短住院时间,降低感染率。然而,在得出最终结论之前仍需要多中心研究和随机试验。