Kusnanto Hari, Agustian Dwi, Hilmanto Dany
Department of Family Medicine and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2018 May-Jun;7(3):497-500. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_145_17.
Biopsychosocial model is a useful worldview for primary care or family doctors. However, it is often considered as impractical or too complicated. The objective of this study is to review the implementation of the biopsychosocial model in clinical practice, and its contributions to clinical outcomes. Hermeneutic circle literature review was conducted to provide experiential learning in an attempt to understand biopscyhosocial model, first developed by George Engel. Literature search started with review articles in Medline and Scopus as search engines. Citations from previous articles, editorials, and research articles were identified and interpreted in the context of the knowledge derived from all identified relevant articles. The progress of biopsychosocial model has been slow, and primary care doctors do not implement biopsychosocial medicine in their practice, while biomedical thinking and approach are still the dominant model. Biopsychosocial research addressed chronic illnesses and functional disorders as conditions in need for biopsychosocial model implementation. As payment scheme, clinical guidelines and clinical performance indicators are biomedically oriented, there is no incentive for primary care doctors to adopt biopsychosocial model in their practice. Workload and lack of competence in primary care may hinder the implementation of biopsychosocial model. Biopsychosocial model helps primary care doctors to understand interactions among biological and psychosocial components of illnesses to improve the dyadic relationship between clinicians and their patients and multidisciplinary approaches in patient care. Biopsychosocial model potentially improves clinical outcomes for chronic diseases and functional illnesses seen in primary care.
生物心理社会模型对于初级保健医生或家庭医生来说是一种有用的世界观。然而,它常常被认为不切实际或过于复杂。本研究的目的是回顾生物心理社会模型在临床实践中的实施情况及其对临床结果的贡献。进行诠释循环文献综述以提供经验性学习,试图理解由乔治·恩格尔首次提出的生物心理社会模型。文献检索首先以Medline和Scopus中的综述文章作为搜索引擎。从先前文章、社论和研究文章中识别出的引文,并在从所有已识别的相关文章中获得的知识背景下进行解释。生物心理社会模型的进展一直很缓慢,初级保健医生在实践中并未实施生物心理社会医学,而生物医学思维和方法仍然是主导模式。生物心理社会研究将慢性病和功能性障碍视为需要实施生物心理社会模型的情况。由于支付方案、临床指南和临床绩效指标都以生物医学为导向,初级保健医生在实践中没有采用生物心理社会模型的动力。初级保健中的工作量和能力不足可能会阻碍生物心理社会模型的实施。生物心理社会模型有助于初级保健医生理解疾病的生物和心理社会成分之间的相互作用,以改善临床医生与患者之间的二元关系以及患者护理中的多学科方法。生物心理社会模型有可能改善初级保健中所见慢性病和功能性疾病的临床结果。