• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

就位力是否会影响托槽的剪切粘结强度?一项体外研究。

Does the Seating Force Affect the Shear Bond Strength of Brackets? An InVitro Study.

作者信息

Sökücü Oral, Yeşildal Seher, Okşayan Rıdvan, Şimşek İrfan

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Gaziantep University School of Dentistry, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Department of Prosthodontics, Gaziantep University School of Dentistry, Gaziantep, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Orthod. 2016 Mar;29(1):6-9. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.15-00009R1. Epub 2016 Mar 1.

DOI:10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.15-00009R1
PMID:30112466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6007706/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to observe two different seating forces on conventional and self-ligating brackets using shear bond strength (SBS).

METHODS

The study material consisted of 48 recently extracted human premolars divided into four groups: Group I, conventional bracket (Master series, AO) 100 g seating force applied; Group II, conventional bracket (Master series, AO) 200 g seating force applied; Group III, self-ligating bracket (Empower, AO) 100 g seating force applied; and Group IV, self-ligating bracket (Empower, AO) 200 g seating force applied. All teeth were bonded with Transbond XT by the same operator. Following the bonding procedure, all teeth were stored in deionized water at 37°C for 30 days, and they were thermal cycled. A universal testing machine was used to obtain the SBS records. The Kruskal-Wallis statistical test was used to determine the significant differences in SBS between the four groups, and the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction was used to compare the subgroups.

RESULTS

The mean shear bond strength was 15.70 MPa for Group I, 13.97 MPa for Group II, 8.38 MPa for Group III, and 8.31 MPa for Group IV. Significant differences in the SBS values were recorded between the self-ligating groups and conventional bracket groups. Seating forces on the brackets did not show any differences among the groups.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations in this study, 100 g and 200 g forces can be applied because both seating forces showed acceptable SBS results.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用剪切粘结强度(SBS)观察常规托槽和自锁托槽上两种不同的就位力。

方法

研究材料包括48颗近期拔除的人类前磨牙,分为四组:第一组,应用100g就位力的常规托槽(Master系列,AO);第二组,应用200g就位力的常规托槽(Master系列,AO);第三组,应用100g就位力的自锁托槽(Empower,AO);第四组,应用200g就位力的自锁托槽(Empower,AO)。所有牙齿均由同一名操作者使用Transbond XT粘结。粘结程序完成后,所有牙齿在37℃的去离子水中储存30天,并进行热循环处理。使用万能试验机获取SBS记录。采用Kruskal-Wallis统计检验确定四组之间SBS的显著差异,并使用经Bonferroni校正的Mann-Whitney U检验比较亚组。

结果

第一组的平均剪切粘结强度为15.70MPa,第二组为13.97MPa,第三组为8.38MPa,第四组为8.31MPa。自锁托槽组和常规托槽组之间的SBS值存在显著差异。托槽上的就位力在各组之间未显示出任何差异。

结论

在本研究的局限性范围内,可以施加100g和200g的力,因为两种就位力均显示出可接受的SBS结果。

相似文献

1
Does the Seating Force Affect the Shear Bond Strength of Brackets? An InVitro Study.就位力是否会影响托槽的剪切粘结强度?一项体外研究。
Turk J Orthod. 2016 Mar;29(1):6-9. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.15-00009R1. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
2
Effect of applying a sustained force during bonding orthodontic brackets on the adhesive layer and on shear bond strength.施加持续力对正畸托槽粘接层及剪切粘接强度的影响。
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Aug;33(4):402-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq096. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
3
Effect of enamel protective agents on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.釉质保护剂对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响
Prog Orthod. 2014 Jul 18;15(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0034-0.
4
The influence of Er:YAG laser conditioning versus self-etching adhesives with acid etching on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.掺铒钇铝石榴石激光预处理与自酸蚀粘结剂加酸蚀对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Photomed Laser Surg. 2007 Dec;25(6):508-12. doi: 10.1089/pho.2007.2096.
5
Debonding force and shear bond strength of an array of CAD/CAM-based customized orthodontic brackets, placed by indirect bonding- An In Vitro study.基于 CAD/CAM 的定制式正畸托槽排的离解力和剪切粘结强度,通过间接粘结法放置-一项体外研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 11;13(9):e0202952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202952. eCollection 2018.
6
Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different self-etching adhesives.使用不同自酸蚀粘接剂粘接的正畸托槽的剪切粘接强度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Sep;136(3):425-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.024.
7
Effects of 6 self-etching primers on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.6种自酸蚀底漆对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Apr;135(4):424.e1-7; discussion 424-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.005.
8
Effect of early orthodontic force on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with different adhesive systems.不同粘接系统正畸托槽的早期正畸力对剪切粘接强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Aug;138(2):208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.034.
9
A new generation of self-etching adhesives: comparison with traditional acid etch technique.新一代自酸蚀粘结剂:与传统酸蚀技术的比较。
J Orofac Orthop. 2008 Mar;69(2):78-93. doi: 10.1007/s00056-008-0709-6.
10
Effect of self-etchant pH on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.自酸蚀剂pH值对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Aug;134(2):203-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.039.

本文引用的文献

1
Inadequate shear bond strengths of self-etch, self-adhesive systems for secure orthodontic bonding.自酸蚀、自粘接系统用于正畸粘接时,其剪切粘结强度不足。
Dent Mater J. 2012;31(6):947-53. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2012-103.
2
Reconditioning of self-ligating brackets.自锁托槽的再处理。
Angle Orthod. 2012 Jan;82(1):158-64. doi: 10.2319/033011-227.1. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
3
Systematic review of self-ligating brackets.自锁托槽的系统评价。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jun;137(6):726.e1-726.e18; discussion 726-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.11.009.
4
Force and amount of resin composite paste used in direct and indirect bonding.直接和间接粘结中使用的树脂复合树脂的力和量。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Nov;80(6):1089-94. doi: 10.2319/031910-41.1.
5
Shear bond strength of self-ligating brackets.自锁托槽的抗剪粘接强度。
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Feb;33(1):71-4. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq041. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
6
Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Cured with Different Light Sources under Thermocycling.热循环条件下不同光源固化正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度
Eur J Dent. 2010 Jul;4(3):257-62.
7
In-vitro orthodontic bond strength testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.体外正畸粘结强度测试:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 May;137(5):615-622.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.021.
8
Shear bond strength comparison of a conventional and a self-etching fluoride-releasing adhesive following thermocycling.热循环后传统型与自酸蚀型含氟粘结剂的剪切粘结强度比较
World J Orthod. 2010 Spring;11(1):6-10.
9
Shear and tensile bond strength comparison of various contemporary orthodontic adhesive systems: an in-vitro study.不同当代正畸粘结系统的剪切和拉伸粘结强度比较:一项体外研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Apr;135(4):422.e1-6; discussion 422-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.001.
10
Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial.Damon3自结扎与传统正畸托槽系统的排齐效率:一项随机临床试验。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Oct;134(4):470.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.04.018.