Wu X-D, Xu W, Tian M, Cheng Q, Huang W
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University , Chongqing , China.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Sep;100(7):e181-e184. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0112. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
Previous studies have demonstrated that revision of total hip arthroplasty consumes considerably more resources than the primary procedure. Worse, patients who need revision procedures are more likely to have radiographic evidence of acetabular and femoral bone loss than those undergone primary total hip arthroplasty. Many techniques have been introduced to manage different conditions of acetabular deficiencies. We describe a rare case of a 67-year-old man with severe acetabular bone loss, which was caused by a long-term loose acetabular component and was successfully managed by cup-on-cup technique. We also discuss the similarities and differences between cup-on-cup and cup-in-cup techniques in the management of protrusio acetabular defects, with a case-based approach.
先前的研究表明,全髋关节置换翻修术比初次手术消耗的资源要多得多。更糟糕的是,需要进行翻修手术的患者比接受初次全髋关节置换术的患者更有可能出现髋臼和股骨骨质流失的影像学证据。已经引入了许多技术来处理髋臼缺损的不同情况。我们描述了一例罕见的67岁男性严重髋臼骨质流失病例,该病例由长期髋臼假体松动引起,并通过杯对杯技术成功治疗。我们还采用基于病例的方法讨论了杯对杯和杯入杯技术在处理髋臼前突缺损方面的异同。