Webb Jonathan E, McGill Robert J, Palumbo Brian T, Moschetti Wayne E, Estok Daniel M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Health System Eau Claire, Eau Claire, Wisconsin.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, Orthopaedics and Podiatry Service, Fort Belvoir, Virginia.
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9S):S225-S231. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
Treatment of massive acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty is complex, and various treatment strategies have been described. We describe a novel technique of using a Trabecular Metal Revision Shell as a buttress augment creating a "double-cup" construct rather than the use of custom triflanges or cup-cage constructs for Paprosky types IIIA and IIIB acetabular defects.
We retrospectively reviewed 20 double-cup cases at a mean of 2.4 years follow-up at a single institution between 2005 and 2014. We evaluated postoperative radiographic evidence of acetabular loosening and complication rates, restoration of hip center of rotation, preoperative and postoperative modified Harris Hip Score, and Merle d'Aubigne-Postel pain and walking scores.
There were no revisions for acetabular loosening and no cases of aseptic loosening. We observed a 25% dislocation rate, which was the most common complication. Most dislocations occurred within the first year after surgery and most were acetabulum only revisions. Hip center of rotation was restored to an average of 22.5 mm within the interteardrop line. Average Harris Hip Score improved from 28.2 to 68.7 (P < .001) and Merle d'Aubigne-Postel pain and walking scores improved from 2.7 to 5.1 and 2.4 to 4, respectively (P < .001).
The double-cup construct is a reliable option for reconstruction of Paprosky type IIIA and IIIB acetabular defects with no cases of acetabular loosening both clinically and radiographically at a mean of 2 years follow-up. The most common complication was dislocation in the acetabulum-only revisions, and clinical outcome measures were reliably improved in surviving cases.
翻修全髋关节置换术中大量髋臼骨缺损的治疗较为复杂,已有多种治疗策略被描述。我们描述了一种新技术,即使用小梁金属翻修髋臼杯作为支撑增强物,构建“双杯”结构,而非使用定制三翼板或杯笼结构来处理Paprosky IIIA和IIIB型髋臼缺损。
我们回顾性分析了2005年至2014年间在单一机构进行的20例双杯病例,平均随访2.4年。我们评估了髋臼松动的术后影像学证据、并发症发生率、髋关节旋转中心的恢复情况、术前和术后改良Harris髋关节评分以及Merle d'Aubigne-Postel疼痛和步行评分。
没有因髋臼松动而进行翻修的病例,也没有无菌性松动的病例。我们观察到脱位率为25%,这是最常见的并发症。大多数脱位发生在术后第一年,且大多数是单纯髋臼翻修病例。髋关节旋转中心平均恢复到泪滴线内22.5毫米。平均Harris髋关节评分从28.2提高到68.7(P <.001),Merle d'Aubigne-Postel疼痛和步行评分分别从2.7提高到5.1和从2.4提高到4(P <.001)。
双杯结构是重建Paprosky IIIA和IIIB型髋臼缺损的可靠选择,在平均2年的随访中,临床和影像学上均无髋臼松动病例。最常见的并发症是单纯髋臼翻修病例中的脱位,存活病例的临床结局指标得到了可靠改善。