Suppr超能文献

骨髓增生异常综合征和急性髓系白血病中去甲基化药物失败后的诱导化疗评估。

Evaluation of induction chemotherapies after hypomethylating agent failure in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.

Malignant Hematology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL.

出版信息

Blood Adv. 2018 Aug 28;2(16):2063-2071. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018015529.

Abstract

Hypomethylating agent (HMA) failure in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) carries a poor prognosis with limited treatment options. Although intensive, remission induction chemotherapy is often used subsequently, in particular to bridge to allogeneic transplantation, it is not clear whether an advantage exists for any particular regimen. Based on an international collaboration, we retrospectively analyzed induction response rate and survival in 366 patients after HMA failure. Patients received 7+3, intermediate- to high-dose cytarabine (IDAC), or purine nucleoside analog-based regimens. For the MDS cohort (n = 307), the overall response rate (ORR) was 41%; median overall survival (OS) was 10.8 months, and 40% of responding patients bridged to allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT). For the AML cohort (n = 59), the ORR was 32%, OS 6 months, and 42% of responding patients bridged to allo-SCT. Prognostic factors for response in MDS included adverse cytogenetics (odds ratio [OR], 0.46, = .01), age ≥65 years (OR, 0.47; < .01), and use of IDAC (OR, 2.91, = .01). Shorter survival was associated with adverse cytogenetics (hazard ratio [HR], 1.43; = .06). In the AML cohort, OS was decreased by disease progression at time of HMA failure (HR, 2.66; = .02) and prolonged with use of an anthracycline-containing regimen (HR, 0.37; = .01). In conclusion, intensive chemotherapy after HMA failure may be a reasonable treatment option for selected patients as a bridge to allogeneic transplantation and should be considered a potential platform for future investigations.

摘要

在急性髓系白血病 (AML) 和骨髓增生异常综合征 (MDS) 中,去甲基化药物 (HMA) 失败预后不良,治疗选择有限。尽管通常会使用强化缓解诱导化疗,特别是为了桥接异基因移植,但目前尚不清楚任何特定方案是否具有优势。基于一项国际合作,我们回顾性分析了 366 例 HMA 失败后患者的诱导缓解率和生存情况。患者接受了 7+3、中高剂量阿糖胞苷 (IDAC) 或嘌呤核苷类似物为基础的方案。对于 MDS 队列 (n=307),总缓解率 (ORR) 为 41%;中位总生存期 (OS) 为 10.8 个月,40%的缓解患者桥接至异基因造血干细胞移植 (allo-SCT)。对于 AML 队列 (n=59),ORR 为 32%,OS 为 6 个月,42%的缓解患者桥接至 allo-SCT。MDS 患者对缓解的预后因素包括不良细胞遗传学 (比值比 [OR],0.46, =.01)、年龄≥65 岁 (OR,0.47; <.01) 和使用 IDAC (OR,2.91, =.01)。较短的生存期与不良细胞遗传学相关 (风险比 [HR],1.43; =.06)。在 AML 队列中,HMA 失败时疾病进展与 OS 降低相关 (HR,2.66; =.02),而使用含蒽环类药物的方案与 OS 延长相关 (HR,0.37; =.01)。总之,对于选择的患者,HMA 失败后进行强化化疗可能是一种合理的治疗选择,作为异基因移植的桥梁,并应被视为未来研究的潜在平台。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bce/6113613/25fc73dbe925/advances015529absf1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验