EngenderHealth, New York, NY, USA. Now with Population Council, New York, NY, USA.
Tanzania Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly and Children, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018 Oct 4;6(3):484-499. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00108. Print 2018 Oct 3.
Tubal occlusion by minilaparotomy is a safe, highly effective, and permanent way to limit childbearing. We aimed to establish whether the safety of the procedure provided by trained clinical officers (COs) was not inferior to the safety when provided by trained assistant medical officers (AMOs), as measured by major adverse event (AE) rates.
In this randomized, controlled, open-label noninferiority trial, we enrolled participants at 7 health facilities in Arusha region, Tanzania, as well as during outreach activities conducted in Arusha and neighboring regions. Consenting, eligible participants were randomly allocated by a research assistant at each site to minilaparotomy performed by a trained CO or by a trained AMO, in a 1:1 ratio. We asked participants to return at 3, 7, and 42 days postsurgery. The primary outcome was the rate of major AEs following minilaparotomy performed by COs versus AMOs, during the procedure and through 42 days follow-up. The noninferiority margin was 2%. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT02944149.
We randomly allocated 1,970 participants between December 2016 and June 2017, 984 to the CO group and 986 to the AMO group. Most (87%) minilaparotomies were conducted during outreach services. In the intent-to-treat analysis, 0 of 978 participants had a major AE in the CO group compared with 1 (0.1%) of 984 in the AMO group (risk difference: -0.1% [95% confidence interval: -0.3% to 0.1%]), meeting the criteria for noninferiority. We saw no evidence of differences in measures of procedure performance, participant satisfaction, or provider self-efficacy between the groups.
Tubal occlusion by minilaparotomy performed by trained COs is safe, effective, and acceptable to women, and the procedure can be safely and effectively provided in outreach settings. Our results provide evidence to support policy change in resource-limited settings to allow task shifting of minilaparotomy to properly trained and supported COs, increasing access to female sterilization and helping to meet the rising demand for the procedure among women wanting to avoid pregnancy. They also suggest high demand for these services in Tanzania, given the large number of women recruited in a relatively short time period.
经皮腹腔镜输卵管绝育术是一种安全、高效且永久的节育方法。本研究旨在评估经培训的临床医生助理(CO)与经过培训的助理医疗官(AMO)实施该手术的安全性,主要终点为主要不良事件(AE)发生率,以评估 CO 实施该手术的安全性是否不劣于 AMO。
这是一项在坦桑尼亚阿鲁沙地区的 7 家卫生机构以及阿鲁沙和周边地区开展的、随机、对照、开放标签的非劣效性临床试验。在研究人员的协助下,符合条件的参与者自愿在各研究地点进行随机分组,每组 984 人,1:1 分配至 CO 组或 AMO 组,分别接受 CO 或 AMO 实施的经皮腹腔镜输卵管绝育术。我们要求参与者在术后 3、7 和 42 天返院。主要结局为 CO 组和 AMO 组在手术期间和术后 42 天内的主要 AE 发生率。非劣效性界值为 2%。该研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT02944149。
2016 年 12 月至 2017 年 6 月期间,共随机分配了 1970 名参与者,其中 984 名接受 CO 组治疗,986 名接受 AMO 组治疗。大多数(87%)经皮腹腔镜输卵管绝育术是在外出服务中进行的。意向性治疗分析显示,CO 组 978 名参与者中无一例发生主要 AE,而 AMO 组 984 名参与者中则有 1 例(0.1%)发生(风险差:-0.1%[95%可信区间:-0.3%至 0.1%]),符合非劣效性标准。两组在手术操作表现、参与者满意度或提供者自我效能方面均无差异的证据。
由经过培训的 CO 实施的经皮腹腔镜输卵管绝育术安全有效,可被女性接受,并且可以在外出服务中安全有效地实施。我们的研究结果为资源有限环境下的政策改变提供了证据支持,即可以将经皮腹腔镜输卵管绝育术的任务转移给经过适当培训和支持的 CO,以增加女性绝育的机会,并有助于满足希望避免怀孕的女性对该手术日益增长的需求。此外,鉴于在相对较短的时间内招募了大量的女性,这也表明坦桑尼亚对这些服务的需求很大。