Abi-Aad Karl R, Aoun Rami James N, Rahme Rudy J, Ward Jennifer D, Kniss Jason, Kwasny Mary Jeanne, Sattur Mithun G, Welz Matthew E, Bendok Bernard R
Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.
Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Neuroradiology. 2018 Oct;60(10):1075-1084. doi: 10.1007/s00234-018-2074-5. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
Aneurysm recanalization constitutes a limitation in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using conventional bare platinum coils. The development of platinum coils coupled with hydrogel polymers aimed at decreasing the rates of recurrence by way of enhanced coil packing density and biological healing within the aneurysm. While enhanced occlusion and durability has been shown for the first generation hydrogel coils, their use was limited by technical challenges. Less data is available regarding the second-generation hydrogel coils which have been designed to perform like bare platinum coils.
The new generation Hydrogel Endovascular Aneurysm Treatment Trial (HEAT) is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial that compares the health outcomes of the second-generation HydroCoil Embolic System with bare platinum coils in the endovascular intracranial aneurysms. The primary endpoint is aneurysm recurrence, defined as any progression on the Raymond aneurysm scale, over a 24-month follow-up period. Secondary endpoints include packing density, functional independence, procedural adverse events, mortality rate, initial complete occlusion, aneurysm retreatment, hemorrhage from treated aneurysm, and any aneurysm recurrence.
Patient recruitment initiated in June 2011 and ended in January 2016 in 46 centers. Six hundred eligible patients diagnosed with an intracranial aneurysm, ruptured or unruptured were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment arms.
The HEAT trial compares the durability, imaging, and clinical outcomes of the second-generation hydrogel versus bare platinum coils in the endovascular treatment of ruptured or unruptured intracranial aneurysms. The results of this trial may further inform current endovascular treatment guidelines based on observed long-term outcomes.
动脉瘤再通是使用传统裸铂线圈进行颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗的一个限制因素。结合水凝胶聚合物的铂线圈的开发旨在通过提高线圈填充密度和动脉瘤内的生物愈合来降低复发率。虽然第一代水凝胶线圈已显示出增强的闭塞性和耐久性,但其使用受到技术挑战的限制。关于设计得像裸铂线圈一样的第二代水凝胶线圈的数据较少。
新一代水凝胶血管内动脉瘤治疗试验(HEAT)是一项多中心、随机对照试验,比较第二代HydroCoil栓塞系统与裸铂线圈在血管内治疗颅内动脉瘤方面的健康结果。主要终点是动脉瘤复发,定义为在24个月的随访期内,雷蒙德动脉瘤分级出现任何进展。次要终点包括填充密度、功能独立性、手术不良事件、死亡率、初始完全闭塞、动脉瘤再治疗、治疗的动脉瘤出血以及任何动脉瘤复发。
患者招募于2011年6月开始,2016年1月在46个中心结束。600例诊断为颅内动脉瘤(破裂或未破裂)的符合条件的患者被随机分配到两个治疗组之一。
HEAT试验比较了第二代水凝胶线圈与裸铂线圈在血管内治疗破裂或未破裂颅内动脉瘤方面的耐久性、影像学和临床结果。该试验的结果可能会根据观察到的长期结果进一步为当前的血管内治疗指南提供信息。