Suppr超能文献

纤维掺入对复合材料收缩应力的影响。

Effect of fiber incorporation on the contraction stress of composite materials.

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Goethestraße 70, 80336, Munich, Germany.

Biomaterials Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Mar;23(3):1461-1471. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2572-1. Epub 2018 Aug 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the effects of fiber incorporation on the contraction stress (CS), time to gelation (TG), and temperature rise (TR) features of two experimental resin-based composites (RBCs) in comparison to those of bulk-fill RBCs and conventional RBCs in simulated, clinically relevant cavities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CS over 300 s, TG and TR were assessed by a stress-strain analyzer (SSA T80) in two cavity configurations (2 × 4 × 4 mm/4 × 4 × 4 mm/configuration value [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]) for two experimental RBCs, eight bulk-fill RBCs (EverX Posterior, Filtek Bulk Fill, SDR, SonicFill, Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill, Venus Bulk Fill, X-tra base, and X-tra Fill) and one RBC (Filtek Supreme XTE) by light curing (1200 mW/cm) (n = 10). The experimental materials used were based on EverX Posterior with modifications made to the fiber and filler content. Statistical analyses were performed via ANOVA; multiple pair-wise comparisons were performed via Tukey's test, and homogeneous subsets were identified ("multcomp" package, R).

RESULTS

CS values ranged from 1.00 to 4.07 MPa (2 × 4 × 4 mm) and from 0.97 to 2.49 MPa (4 × 4 × 4 mm); TG values ranged from 1.31 to 4.05 s (2 × 4 × 4 mm) and from 1.39 to 3.84 s (4 × 4 × 4 mm). SDR values showed lowest stress values in both cavity configurations. The experimental composite with fibers presented significantly higher stress values than did the experimental composite without fibers.

CONCLUSION

Bulk-fill RBCs showed lower levels of stress than did conventional RBCs. The incorporation of fibers had no positive impact on the CS and TG.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Appropriate material selection may be essential to clinical success because certain RBCs exhibit higher CS, TG, and TR values.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估纤维掺入对两种实验性树脂基复合材料(RBC)的收缩应力(CS)、凝胶时间(TG)和温升(TR)特性的影响,并与模拟临床相关腔中的块状填充 RBC 和常规 RBC 进行比较。

材料和方法

通过应变分析仪(SSA T80)在两种腔配置(2×4×4mm/4×4×4mm/配置值[公式:见文本]和[公式:见文本])中评估两种实验性 RBC、八种块状填充 RBC(EverX Posterior、Filtek Bulk Fill、SDR、SonicFill、Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill、Venus Bulk Fill、X-tra base 和 X-tra Fill)和一种 RBC(Filtek Supreme XTE)的 CS 超过 300s、TG 和 TR,通过光固化(1200mW/cm)(n=10)。所用的实验材料基于 EverX Posterior,对纤维和填料含量进行了修改。通过方差分析进行统计学分析;通过 Tukey 检验进行多重两两比较,并通过“multcomp”包(R)确定同质子集。

结果

CS 值范围为 1.00 至 4.07MPa(2×4×4mm)和 0.97 至 2.49MPa(4×4×4mm);TG 值范围为 1.31 至 4.05s(2×4×4mm)和 1.39 至 3.84s(4×4×4mm)。SDR 值在两种腔配置下均显示出最低的应力值。含纤维的实验性复合材料的应力值明显高于不含纤维的实验性复合材料。

结论

块状填充 RBC 的应力值低于常规 RBC。纤维的掺入对 CS 和 TG 没有积极影响。

临床相关性

由于某些 RBC 表现出更高的 CS、TG 和 TR 值,因此适当的材料选择可能对临床成功至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验