Suppr超能文献

简易自杀风险评估尺的编制与初步使用研究。

Development and pilot study of simple suicide risk rulers for use in the emergency department.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, One Boston Medical Center Place, Boston, MA 02118, United States of America. Electronic address: laurel.o'

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655, United States of America.

出版信息

Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020 Mar-Apr;63:97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many patients treated in the emergency department (ED) for non-psychiatric complaints have elevated suicide risk. Universal screening can detect occult suicide risk, but gold standard risk measurement tools, such as the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS), are too long and cumbersome for ED use.

OBJECTIVE

To test the performance of seven novel 0- to 10-point suicide risk "rulers" against the BSS.

METHOD

399 patients from three EDs completed seven novel risk rulers, traditional binary screening items, and the BSS. Using BSS criterion references, we tested the diagnostic performance of each risk ruler and examined correlations between the rulers and BSS scores.

RESULTS

By varying thresholds on the risk rulers, high levels of sensitivity and specificity were obtained. A threshold of 3 on the "sadness" ruler gave 89% sensitivity for the BSS criterion reference, and a threshold of 1 on the "wish to be dead" ruler provided 94-97% specificity.

CONCLUSION

Our novel risk rulers may be an efficient way to detect risk and triage potentially suicidal patients, showing good concurrent validity with the BSS. Clinicians can obtain high sensitivity and high specificity using just two rulers. Further research should examine the rulers' ability to predict independent clinician risk ratings and prospective suicidal behavior.

摘要

背景

许多在急诊科(ED)因非精神科疾病就诊的患者有较高的自杀风险。普遍筛查可以发现隐匿性自杀风险,但贝克自杀意念量表(BSS)等黄金标准风险测量工具对于 ED 来说太长且繁琐。

目的

测试七种新的 0 至 10 分自杀风险“标尺”与 BSS 的性能。

方法

来自三家 ED 的 399 名患者完成了七种新的风险标尺、传统的二进制筛查项目和 BSS。使用 BSS 标准参考,我们测试了每个风险标尺的诊断性能,并检查了标尺与 BSS 评分之间的相关性。

结果

通过改变风险标尺上的阈值,可以获得较高的灵敏度和特异性。“悲伤”标尺上的阈值为 3 可获得 BSS 标准参考的 89%的灵敏度,而“想死”标尺上的阈值为 1 可提供 94-97%的特异性。

结论

我们的新型风险标尺可能是一种有效检测风险和分诊潜在自杀患者的方法,与 BSS 具有良好的同时效度。临床医生只需使用两个标尺即可获得高灵敏度和高特异性。进一步的研究应该检验标尺预测独立临床医生风险评估和前瞻性自杀行为的能力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验