Suppr超能文献

自杀筛查量表可能无法充分预测急诊科自杀患者的处置情况。

Suicide screening scales may not adequately predict disposition of suicidal patients from the emergency department.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine Behavioral Emergences Research (DEMBER) lab, 4301 West Markham St, #584, Little Rock, AR 72205, United States.

Department of Emergency Medicine Behavioral Emergences Research (DEMBER) lab, 4301 West Markham St, #584, Little Rock, AR 72205, United States.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;36(10):1779-1783. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.087. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Suicide screening scales have been advocated for use in the ED setting. However, it is currently unknown whether patients classified as low-risk on these scales can be safely discharged from the emergency department. This study evaluated the utility of three commonly-used suicide screening tools in the emergency department to predict ED disposition, with special interest in discharge among low-risk patients.

METHODS

This prospective observational study enrolled a convenience sample of patients who answered "yes" to a triage suicidal ideation question in an urban academic emergency department. Patients were administered the weighted modified SADPERSONS Scale, Suicide Assessment Five-step Evaluation and Triage, and Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Patients who subsequently received a psychiatric evaluation were included, and the utility of these screening tools to predict disposition was evaluated.

RESULTS

276 subjects completed all three suicide screening tools and were included in data analyses. Eighty-two patients (30%) were admitted or transferred. Three patients (1%) died by suicide within one year of enrollment; one was hospitalized at the end of his or her enrollment visit, dying by suicide seven months later and the other two were discharged, dying by suicide nine and ten months later, respectively. The screening tools exhibited modest negative predictive values (range: 0.66-0.73).

CONCLUSION

Three suicide screening tools displayed modest ability to predict the disposition of patients who presented to an emergency department with suicidal ideation. This study supports the current ACEP clinical policy on psychiatric patients which states that screening tools should not be used in isolation to guide disposition decisions of suicidal patients from the ED.

摘要

背景

自杀筛查量表已被提倡用于急诊环境中。然而,目前尚不清楚这些量表上被归类为低风险的患者是否可以安全地从急诊部门出院。本研究评估了三种常用的自杀筛查工具在急诊室中预测 ED 处置的效用,特别关注低风险患者的出院情况。

方法

本前瞻性观察性研究纳入了在城市学术急诊部门回答“是”的分诊自杀意念问题的便利样本患者。患者接受了加权改良 SADPERSONS 量表、自杀评估五步评估和分诊以及哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表的评估。随后接受精神科评估的患者被纳入研究,并评估这些筛查工具对处置的预测效用。

结果

276 名患者完成了所有三种自杀筛查工具的评估,并纳入数据分析。82 名患者(30%)被收治或转院。3 名患者(1%)在入组后一年内自杀死亡;其中 1 名患者在入组就诊结束时住院,7 个月后自杀身亡,另外 2 名患者出院,分别在 9 个月和 10 个月后自杀身亡。这些筛查工具的阴性预测值均为中等(范围:0.66-0.73)。

结论

三种自杀筛查工具在预测有自杀意念就诊于急诊的患者处置方面表现出中等的预测能力。本研究支持目前 ACEP 关于精神科患者的临床政策,即筛查工具不应单独用于指导自杀患者从急诊部门的处置决策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验