J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 2;73(12):1579-1595. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1032. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
Secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) is the most common adult congenital heart defect and can present with wide variation in clinical findings. With the intention of preventing morbidity and mortality associated with late presentation of ASD, consensus guidelines have recommended surgical or percutaneous ASD closure in adults with right heart enlargement, with or without symptoms. The aim of the present analysis was to determine if the protective effect of secundum ASD closure in adults could be qualified by pooling data from published studies. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed by using EMBASE, MEDLINE (through PubMed), and the Cochrane Library databases to assess the effect of secundum ASD percutaneous or surgical closure in unoperated adults ≥18 years of age. Data were pooled across studies with the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model or a Bayesian meta-analysis model. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran's Q test. Bias assessment was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and statistical risk of bias was assessed with Begg and Mazumdar's test and Egger's test. A total of 11 nonrandomized studies met the inclusion criteria, contributing 603 patients. Pooled analysis showed a protective effect of ASD closure on New York Heart Association functional class and on right ventricular systolic pressure, volumes, and dimensions. Two additional studies comprising 652 patients were reviewed separately for mortality outcome and primary outcome of interest because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Those studies showed that ASD closure was associated with a weak protective effect on adjusted mortality rate but no significant impact on atrial arrhythmias in patients >50 years of age. Across all studies, there was significant heterogeneity between studies for nearly all clinical outcomes. The overall body of evidence was limited to observational cohort studies, the limitations of which make for low-strength evidence. Even within the parameters of the included studies, quality of evidence was further diminished by the lack of well-defined clinical outcomes. In conclusion, pooled data analysis on the impact of secundum ASD closure in adults was notably limited because of the lack of randomized controlled trials in patients with only secundum ASD. The few cohort studies in this population demonstrated improvement in functional status and right ventricular size and function as shown by echocardiogram. However, our findings suggest that at the time of this publication, insufficient data are available to determine the impact of ASD repair on mortality rate in adults.
继发房间隔缺损(ASD)是最常见的成人先天性心脏病,临床表现差异很大。为了预防 ASD 晚期出现的发病率和死亡率,共识指南建议对右心扩大的成人患者进行 ASD 经皮或手术闭合,无论有无症状。本分析旨在通过汇集已发表研究的数据来确定 ASD 闭合对成人的保护作用是否可以得到证明。通过使用 EMBASE、MEDLINE(通过 PubMed)和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库进行系统评价和荟萃分析,评估 ASD 经皮或手术闭合对未经手术治疗的≥18 岁成人的影响。使用 DerSimonian-Laird 随机效应模型或贝叶斯荟萃分析模型对来自多个研究的数据进行汇总。使用 Cochran's Q 检验评估研究间异质性。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具进行偏倚评估,并使用 Begg 和 Mazumdar 检验和 Egger 检验进行统计学偏倚风险评估。共有 11 项非随机研究符合纳入标准,共纳入 603 例患者。汇总分析显示 ASD 闭合对纽约心脏协会功能分级和右心室收缩压、容量和维度有保护作用。另外两项包含 652 例患者的研究因不符合纳入标准而分别单独进行了死亡率和主要结局的回顾性分析。这些研究表明,在>50 岁的患者中, ASD 闭合与调整后的死亡率呈弱保护相关,但对房性心律失常无显著影响。在所有研究中,几乎所有临床结局的研究间均存在显著异质性。总体证据仅限于观察性队列研究,这些研究的局限性导致证据强度较低。即使在纳入研究的范围内,由于缺乏明确定义的临床结局,证据质量也进一步降低。总之,由于仅存在 ASD 的成人患者缺乏随机对照试验,因此 ASD 闭合对成人影响的汇总数据分析明显受限。在这一人群中,为数不多的队列研究表明,超声心动图显示功能状态和右心室大小和功能得到改善。然而,我们的研究结果表明,在本研究发表时,尚无足够的数据来确定 ASD 修复对成人死亡率的影响。