Circulation. 2019 Apr 2;139(14):e801-e813. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000604.
Patients with systemic morphological right ventricles (RVs), including congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries and dextro-transposition of the great arteries with a Mustard or Senning atrial baffle repair, have a high likelihood of developing systemic ventricular dysfunction. Unfortunately, there are a limited number of clinical studies on the efficacy of medical therapy for systemic RV dysfunction. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), beta blockers, and aldosterone antagonists in adults with systemic RVs. The inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years, systemic RVs, and at least 3 months of treatment with ACE inhibitor, ARB, beta blocker, or aldosterone antagonist. The outcomes included RV end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions, RV ejection fraction, functional class, and exercise capacity. EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases were searched. The selected data were pooled and analyzed with the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis model. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran's Q test. A Bayesian meta-analysis model was also used in the event that heterogeneity was low. Bias assessment was performed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, and statistical risk of bias was assessed with Begg and Mazumdar's test and Egger's test. Six studies met the inclusion criteria, contributing a total of 187 patients; treatment with beta blocker was the intervention that could not be analyzed because of the small number of patients and diversity of outcomes reported. After at least 3 months of treatment with ACE inhibitors, ARBs, or aldosterone antagonists, there was no statistically significant change in mean ejection fraction, ventricular dimensions, or peak ventilatory equivalent of oxygen. The methodological quality of the majority of included studies was low, mainly because of a lack of a randomized and controlled design, small sample size, and incomplete follow-up. In conclusion, pooled results across the limited available studies did not provide conclusive evidence with regard to a beneficial effect of medical therapy in adults with systemic RV dysfunction. Randomized controlled trials or comparative-effectiveness studies that are sufficiently powered to demonstrate effect are needed to elucidate the efficacy of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, beta blockers, and aldosterone antagonists in patients with systemic RVs.
患有系统性形态右心室(RV)疾病的患者,包括先天性矫正大动脉转位和 Mustard 或 Senning 心房隔瓣修复的右旋性大动脉转位,极有可能发生系统性心室功能障碍。不幸的是,目前关于系统性 RV 功能障碍的医学治疗效果的临床研究数量有限。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)、β受体阻滞剂和醛固酮拮抗剂在患有系统性 RV 的成年人中的疗效。纳入标准包括年龄≥18 岁、系统性 RV 和至少 3 个月的 ACE 抑制剂、ARB、β受体阻滞剂或醛固酮拮抗剂治疗。结局包括 RV 舒张末期和收缩末期直径、RV 射血分数、功能分级和运动能力。检索了 EMBASE、PubMed 和 Cochrane 数据库。选择的数据采用 DerSimonian-Laird 随机效应荟萃分析模型进行汇总和分析。采用 Cochran's Q 检验评估研究间异质性。如果异质性低,则采用贝叶斯荟萃分析模型。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具进行偏倚评估,并采用 Begg 和 Mazumdar 检验和 Egger 检验评估统计学偏倚风险。有 6 项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入 187 例患者;由于患者数量少和报告的结局多样化,无法对β受体阻滞剂治疗进行分析。在接受 ACE 抑制剂、ARB 或醛固酮拮抗剂治疗至少 3 个月后,平均射血分数、心室直径或最大通气氧当量均无统计学显著变化。大多数纳入研究的方法学质量较低,主要是因为缺乏随机对照设计、样本量小和随访不完整。总之,根据有限的现有研究汇总结果,不能提供关于医学治疗对成人系统性 RV 功能障碍有益作用的确凿证据。需要进行足够有力的随机对照试验或比较有效性研究,以阐明 ACE 抑制剂、ARB、β受体阻滞剂和醛固酮拮抗剂在系统性 RV 患者中的疗效。