Suppr超能文献

慢性口面部疼痛的非侵入性脑刺激:一项系统综述。

Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review.

作者信息

Herrero Babiloni Alberto, Guay Samuel, Nixdorf Donald R, de Beaumont Louis, Lavigne Gilles

机构信息

Research Center, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Université De Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada,

Division of TMD & Orofacial Pain, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2018 Aug 1;11:1445-1457. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S168705. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are non-invasive brain stimulation techniques that are being explored as therapeutic alternatives for the management of various chronic pain conditions.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy of TMS and tDCS in reducing clinical pain intensity in chronic orofacial pain (OFP) disorders. The secondary objectives are to describe adverse effects, duration of relief, and TMS/tDCS methodologies used in chronic OFP disorders.

METHODS

A search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Inclusion criteria were 1) population: adults diagnosed with chronic OFP including neuropathic and non-neuropathic disorders; 2) intervention: active TMS or tDCS stimulation regardless of the used protocol; 3) comparison: sham TMS or tDCS stimulation; and 4) outcome: primary outcome was patient reported pain intensity. Secondary outcomes were duration of pain relief, adverse effects, and methodological parameters. Risk of bias and quality of study reporting were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 556 individual citations were identified by the search strategy, with 14 articles meeting selection criteria (TMS=11; tDCS=3). Data were obtained for a total of 228 patients. Included OFP disorders were trigeminal neuralgia, trigeminal neuropathy, burning mouth syndrome, atypical facial pain, and temporomandibular disorders. Significant pain reductions were obtained in both techniques. More number of sessions yielded to more durable effects. Overall, high risk of bias and poor study quality were found.

CONCLUSION

TMS and tDCS appear to be safe and promising alternatives to reduce pain intensity in different chronic OFP disorders. Additional research effort is needed to reduce bias, improve quality, and characterize optimal brain stimulation parameters to promote their efficacy.

摘要

背景

经颅磁刺激(TMS)和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是非侵入性脑刺激技术,正在被探索作为治疗各种慢性疼痛病症的替代疗法。

目的

本系统评价的主要目的是评估TMS和tDCS在降低慢性口面部疼痛(OFP)疾病临床疼痛强度方面的疗效。次要目的是描述慢性OFP疾病中使用的TMS/tDCS方法的不良反应、缓解持续时间。

方法

在MEDLINE、Embase、科学网、Scopus和谷歌学术进行检索。纳入标准为:1)人群:诊断为慢性OFP的成年人,包括神经性和非神经性疾病;2)干预:无论采用何种方案,均为主动TMS或tDCS刺激;3)对照:假TMS或tDCS刺激;4)结局:主要结局是患者报告的疼痛强度。次要结局是疼痛缓解持续时间、不良反应和方法学参数。还评估了偏倚风险和研究报告质量。

结果

通过检索策略共识别出556条单独的文献引用,其中14篇文章符合选择标准(TMS = 11篇;tDCS = 3篇)。共获得228例患者的数据。纳入的OFP疾病包括三叉神经痛、三叉神经病变、灼口综合征、非典型面部疼痛和颞下颌关节紊乱病。两种技术均使疼痛显著减轻。治疗次数越多,效果越持久。总体而言,发现偏倚风险高且研究质量差。

结论

TMS和tDCS似乎是降低不同慢性OFP疾病疼痛强度的安全且有前景的替代方法。需要进一步的研究努力来减少偏倚、提高质量并确定最佳脑刺激参数以提高其疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b21/6078189/d83abd37acd9/jpr-11-1445Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验