• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

艾司洛尔输注用于感染性休克合并心动过速患者:一项前瞻性、单臂、可行性研究。

Esmolol infusion in patients with septic shock and tachycardia: a prospective, single-arm, feasibility study.

作者信息

Brown Samuel M, Beesley Sarah J, Lanspa Michael J, Grissom Colin K, Wilson Emily L, Parikh Samir M, Sarge Todd, Talmor Daniel, Banner-Goodspeed Valerie, Novack Victor, Thompson B Taylor, Shahul Sajid

机构信息

1Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT USA.

2Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Aug 3;4:132. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0321-5. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1186/s40814-018-0321-5
PMID:30123523
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6091011/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High adrenergic tone appears to be associated with mortality in septic shock, while adrenergic antagonism may improve survival. In preparation for a randomized trial, we conducted a prospective, single-arm pilot study of esmolol infusion for patients with septic shock and tachycardia that persists after adequate volume expansion.

METHODS

From April 2016 to March 2017, we enrolled patients admitted to an intensive care unit with sepsis who were receiving vasopressor infusion and were tachycardic despite adequate volume expansion. All patients received a continuous intravenous infusion of esmolol, targeted to heart rate 80-90/min, while receiving vasopressors. The feasibility outcomes were proportion of eligible patients consented, compliance with pre-infusion safety check, and compliance with the titration protocol. The primary clinical outcome was organ-failure-free days (OFFD) at 28 days.

RESULTS

We enrolled 7 of 10 eligible patients. Mean age was 46 (± 19) years, and mean admission APACHE II was 28 (± 8). Median norepinephrine infusion rate at the initiation of esmolol infusion was 0.20 (0.14-0.23) μg/kg/min. Compliance with the safety check was 100%; compliance with components of the titration protocol was 98-100%. OFFD were 26 (24.5-26); all patients survived to day 90. Median peak esmolol infusion was 50 (25-50) μg/kg/min. Median peak norepinephrine infusion rate during esmolol infusion was 0.46 (0.13-0.50) μg/kg/min. Four patients achieved target heart rate. Protocol-defined stop events, suggesting possible intolerance to a given infusion rate, occurred in three patients, all of whom were receiving at least 50 μg/kg/min of esmolol.

CONCLUSIONS

In a pilot, single-arm study, we report the first published experience with esmolol infusion in tachycardic patients with septic shock in the United States. These findings support a phase 2 trial of esmolol infusion for septic shock. Lower infusion rates of esmolol infusion may be better tolerated and more feasible than higher infusion rates for such a trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02841241) on 19 July 2016.

摘要

背景

高肾上腺素能状态似乎与感染性休克患者的死亡率相关,而肾上腺素能拮抗作用可能会提高生存率。在准备一项随机试验时,我们对感染性休克且在充分扩容后仍存在心动过速的患者进行了一项前瞻性单臂试验性研究,给予艾司洛尔静脉输注。

方法

2016年4月至2017年3月,我们纳入了入住重症监护病房、患有脓毒症、正在接受血管升压药输注且尽管充分扩容仍心动过速的患者。所有患者在接受血管升压药治疗的同时,接受艾司洛尔持续静脉输注,目标心率为80 - 90次/分钟。可行性指标包括同意参与的合格患者比例、输液前安全检查的依从性以及滴定方案的依从性。主要临床结局是28天时无器官衰竭天数(OFFD)。

结果

我们纳入了10名合格患者中的7名。平均年龄为46(±19)岁,入院时急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)平均为28(±8)。开始输注艾司洛尔时去甲肾上腺素的中位输注速率为0.20(0.14 - 0.23)μg/kg/分钟。安全检查的依从性为100%;滴定方案各部分的依从性为98% - 100%。OFFD为26(24.5 - 26);所有患者均存活至90天。艾司洛尔的中位峰值输注量为50(25 - 50)μg/kg/分钟。输注艾司洛尔期间去甲肾上腺素的中位峰值输注速率为0.46(0.13 - 0.50)μg/kg/分钟。4名患者达到目标心率。3名患者发生了方案定义的停药事件,提示可能对给定的输注速率不耐受,这3名患者均接受了至少50μg/kg/分钟的艾司洛尔。

结论

在一项单臂试验性研究中,我们报告了美国首次发表的关于在感染性休克心动过速患者中输注艾司洛尔的经验。这些发现支持进行艾司洛尔治疗感染性休克的2期试验。对于这样一项试验,较低的艾司洛尔输注速率可能比较高的输注速率耐受性更好且更可行。

试验注册

本研究于2016年7月19日在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT02841241)进行了回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7289/6091011/23688c3db2cb/40814_2018_321_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7289/6091011/23688c3db2cb/40814_2018_321_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7289/6091011/23688c3db2cb/40814_2018_321_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Esmolol infusion in patients with septic shock and tachycardia: a prospective, single-arm, feasibility study.艾司洛尔输注用于感染性休克合并心动过速患者:一项前瞻性、单臂、可行性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Aug 3;4:132. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0321-5. eCollection 2018.
2
Effect of heart rate control with esmolol on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock: a randomized clinical trial.艾司洛尔对感染性休克患者血流动力学和临床结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2013 Oct 23;310(16):1683-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278477.
3
Esmolol to Treat the Hemodynamic Effects of Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial.艾司洛尔治疗脓毒性休克的血流动力学效应:一项随机对照试验。
Shock. 2022 Apr 1;57(4):508-517. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001905.
4
[Effect of esmolol in septic shock patients with tachycardia: a randomized clinical trial].艾司洛尔对脓毒性休克心动过速患者的影响:一项随机临床试验
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 May 7;99(17):1317-1322. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.17.009.
5
Hemodynamic and anti-inflammatory effects of early esmolol use in hyperkinetic septic shock: a pilot study.早期使用艾司洛尔对高动力型感染性休克的血液动力学和抗炎作用:一项初步研究。
Crit Care. 2021 Jan 7;25(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03445-w.
6
Heart rate reduction with esmolol is associated with improved arterial elastance in patients with septic shock: a prospective observational study.艾司洛尔降低心率与感染性休克患者动脉弹性改善相关:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1528-1534. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4351-2. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
7
[Esmolol improves clinical outcome and tissue oxygen metabolism in patients with septic shock through controlling heart rate].艾司洛尔通过控制心率改善感染性休克患者的临床结局和组织氧代谢
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Sep;27(9):759-63.
8
Landiolol and Organ Failure in Patients With Septic Shock: The STRESS-L Randomized Clinical Trial.地佐辛和脓毒性休克患者的器官衰竭:STRESS-L 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Nov 7;330(17):1641-1652. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.20134.
9
Multi-complexity measures of heart rate variability and the effect of vasopressor titration: a prospective cohort study of patients with septic shock.心率变异性的多复杂性测量及血管升压药滴定的效果:一项针对感染性休克患者的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 10;16(1):551. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1896-1.
10
[Effect of esmolol on fluid responsiveness and hemodynamic parameters in patients with septic shock].艾司洛尔对感染性休克患者液体反应性及血流动力学参数的影响
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Nov;27(11):885-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Landiolol for Treatment of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Critical Care: A Systematic Review.在重症监护中使用兰地洛尔治疗新发房颤:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2024 May 17;13(10):2951. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102951.
2
The influence of metoprolol in patients with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy: A retrospective study.美托洛尔对脓毒症性心肌病患者的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Saudi Med J. 2023 Oct;44(10):1030-1036. doi: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.10.20230149.
3
Dysfunction of the Autonomic Nervous System and its Role in the Pathogenesis of Septic Critical Illness (Review).

本文引用的文献

1
Rationale and Design of an Adaptive Phase 2b/3 Clinical Trial of Selepressin for Adults in Septic Shock. Selepressin Evaluation Programme for Sepsis-induced Shock-Adaptive Clinical Trial.用于脓毒性休克成人的 Selepressin 适应性 2b/3 期临床试验的原理和设计。Selepressin 评价计划用于脓毒症诱导性休克适应性临床试验。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Feb;15(2):250-257. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201708-669SD.
2
Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014.2009 - 2014年美国医院中使用临床数据与索赔数据的脓毒症发病率及趋势
JAMA. 2017 Oct 3;318(13):1241-1249. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.13836.
3
Selepressin, a novel selective vasopressin V agonist, is an effective substitute for norepinephrine in a phase IIa randomized, placebo-controlled trial in septic shock patients.
自主神经系统功能障碍及其在脓毒症危重症发病机制中的作用(综述)。
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2021;12(4):106-116. doi: 10.17691/stm2020.12.4.12. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
4
Effect of heart rate control with amiodarone infusion on hemodynamic and clinical outcomes in septic shock patients with tachycardia: a prospective, single-arm clinical study.胺碘酮静脉输注控制心率对脓毒症休克心动过速患者血流动力学及临床结局的影响:一项前瞻性单臂临床研究。
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2021 Oct 11;7(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40780-021-00219-6.
塞莱昔醇,一种新型选择性血管加压素 V 激动剂,在脓毒性休克患者的 IIa 期随机、安慰剂对照试验中是去甲肾上腺素的有效替代品。
Crit Care. 2017 Aug 15;21(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1798-7.
4
Angiotensin II for the Treatment of Vasodilatory Shock.血管扩张性休克的血管紧张素 II 治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):419-430. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704154. Epub 2017 May 21.
5
Associations among left ventricular systolic function, tachycardia, and cardiac preload in septic patients.脓毒症患者左心室收缩功能、心动过速和心脏前负荷之间的关联。
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0240-2. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
6
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016 年版。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
7
Levosimendan for the Prevention of Acute Organ Dysfunction in Sepsis.左西孟旦用于预防脓毒症急性器官功能障碍
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 27;375(17):1638-1648. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609409. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
8
Relative Bradycardia in Patients With Septic Shock Requiring Vasopressor Therapy.需要血管加压药治疗的感染性休克患者的相对心动过缓。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):225-233. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002065.
9
Application of a simplified definition of diastolic function in severe sepsis and septic shock.简化舒张功能定义在严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中的应用。
Crit Care. 2016 Aug 4;20(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1421-3.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol in Treatment of Patients with Septic Shock.艾司洛尔治疗感染性休克患者的疗效与安全性
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Jul 20;129(14):1658-65. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.185856.