Li Weiping, Song Yang, Song Bin, Yang Rui, Xing Tong, Chen Zhong, Zhang Zhengzheng, Ouyang Yi
Sports Medicine Department, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
Department of Orthopedics, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, PR China.
J Orthop Translat. 2018 Mar 24;14:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2018.03.002. eCollection 2018 Jul.
In 2009, a reverse "Y" plasty anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction technique was proposed, with double-tibial tunnel and single-femoral tunnel, and the result obtained proved that the reverse "Y" plasty technique was satisfactory. This cadaveric study was designed to compare the reverse "Y" plasty reconstruction method with the conventional single-bundle technique for the first time.
In this study, 30 cadaveric knees were used and were randomly divided into five groups with six knees each. Six cadaveric knees with intact ACL were treated as the control group, and another six knees with ruptured ACL were treated as the rupture group. In group A, the single-bundle technique was used. In groups B and C, reverse "Y" plasty technique was used, and the grafts were fixed with absorbable biointerference screws in tibiae and absorbable biointerference screws (Group B) or Endobutton (Group C) in femora. Five groups were tested with an MTS material testing machine (MTS-858) by the use of a cyclic loading of 134 N at 15°, 30°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion and a combined 7-Nm valgus torque and 5-Nm internal tibial rotation torque at 15°, 30°, 45° and 60° of knee flexion.
Both single-bundle and reverse "Y" plasty groups demonstrated similar anterior-posterior stability compared with the control group, whereas the single-bundle group showed inferior rotational stability tested at 30° and 45° of knee flexion than the reverse "Y" plasty group and control group. These two different fixation methods at the femoral site (Group B and C) showed no difference in anterior-posterior and rotational stability.
The new reverse "Y" plasty ACL reconstruction method may restore normal knee stability, especially rotational stability, better than single-bundle reconstruction.
This study provides strong support for the new reverse "Y" plasty ACL reconstruction technique and is expected to propose a new surgical approach with good biomechanical features.
2009年,有人提出一种反向“Y”形前交叉韧带(ACL)重建技术,采用双胫骨隧道和单股骨隧道,结果表明该反向“Y”形成形技术效果良好。本尸体研究旨在首次将反向“Y”形成形重建方法与传统单束技术进行比较。
本研究使用30具尸体膝关节,随机分为五组,每组六个膝关节。六个ACL完整的尸体膝关节作为对照组,另外六个ACL断裂的膝关节作为断裂组。A组采用单束技术。B组和C组采用反向“Y”形成形技术,移植物在胫骨处用可吸收生物干涉螺钉固定,在股骨处用可吸收生物干涉螺钉(B组)或Endobutton(C组)固定。五组通过MTS材料试验机(MTS-858)进行测试,在膝关节屈曲15°、30°、60°和90°时施加134 N的循环载荷,在膝关节屈曲15°、30°、45°和60°时施加7 N·m的外翻扭矩和5 N·m的胫骨内旋扭矩。
与对照组相比,单束组和反向“Y”形成形组均表现出相似的前后稳定性,而单束组在膝关节屈曲30°和45°时的旋转稳定性低于反向“Y”形成形组和对照组。股骨部位的这两种不同固定方法(B组和C组)在前后稳定性和旋转稳定性方面没有差异。
新的反向“Y”形ACL重建方法可能比单束重建更好地恢复正常膝关节稳定性,尤其是旋转稳定性。
本研究为新的反向“Y”形ACL重建技术提供了有力支持,有望提出一种具有良好生物力学特性的新手术方法。