• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SecurAcath 用于外周静脉置入中心静脉导管固定:NICE 医疗技术指南。

SecurAcath for Securing Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.

机构信息

King's Technology Evaluation Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, 5th Floor, Becket House, 1 Lambeth Palace Road, London, SE1 7EU, UK.

King's Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Dec;16(6):779-791. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0427-1.

DOI:10.1007/s40258-018-0427-1
PMID:30123950
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6244619/
Abstract

Central venous catheters are commonly used to deliver therapies and to monitor patients, and require securing at the point of percutaneous entry to avoid dislodgement. SecurAcath is a catheter securement device designed for central venous catheters. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, as a part of its Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme, selected this device for evaluation and invited the manufacturer, Interrad Medical, to submit clinical and economic evidence. The King's Technology Evaluation Centre, an External Assessment Centre commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, independently critiqued the manufacturer's submissions. The External Assessment Centre found a lack of evidence comparing SecurAcath with alternative approaches to securement (StatLock, suturing, tape securement), with one unpublished randomised controlled trial providing the strongest evidence. The External Assessment Centre conducted a new systematic review and meta-analysis and concluded that there is some evidence indicating the non-inferiority of SecurAcath compared to StatLock. The External Assessment Centre considered the manufacturer's economic model to be appropriate but made revisions to some parameters and noted significant heterogeneity in the included studies. The revised model indicated that StatLock was more cost effective than SecurAcath for catheter indwell times of up to 5 days; however, for medium- and long-term indwell times, SecurAcath was the most cost-effective option. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Medical Technologies Guidance MTG 34, issued in June 2017, recommended the adoption of SecurAcath for securing peripherally inserted central catheters within the National Health Service in England.

摘要

中心静脉导管常用于治疗和监测患者,并需要在经皮穿刺部位固定,以避免移位。SecurAcath 是一种专门设计用于中心静脉导管的导管固定装置。国家卫生与保健卓越研究所(NICE)作为其医疗技术评估计划的一部分,选择了该设备进行评估,并邀请制造商 Interrad Medical 提交临床和经济证据。国王技术评估中心(由 NICE 委托的外部评估中心)独立审查了制造商的提交材料。外部评估中心发现,缺乏将 SecurAcath 与替代固定方法(StatLock、缝合、胶带固定)进行比较的证据,唯一一项未发表的随机对照试验提供了最强的证据。外部评估中心进行了一项新的系统评价和荟萃分析,得出的结论是有一些证据表明 SecurAcath 与 StatLock 相比具有非劣效性。外部评估中心认为制造商的经济模型是合适的,但对一些参数进行了修订,并注意到纳入研究中存在显著的异质性。修订后的模型表明,对于导管留置时间不超过 5 天的情况,StatLock 比 SecurAcath 更具成本效益;然而,对于中、长期留置时间,SecurAcath 是最具成本效益的选择。国家卫生与保健卓越研究所(NICE)于 2017 年 6 月发布的医疗技术指南 MTG34 建议在英格兰国民保健制度中采用 SecurAcath 来固定外周插入的中心导管。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b2/6244619/9610bd43b3f6/40258_2018_427_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b2/6244619/9610bd43b3f6/40258_2018_427_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99b2/6244619/9610bd43b3f6/40258_2018_427_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
SecurAcath for Securing Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.SecurAcath 用于外周静脉置入中心静脉导管固定:NICE 医疗技术指南。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Dec;16(6):779-791. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0427-1.
2
An observational study of the securement of central venous access devices with a subcutaneous anchor device in a paediatric population at a tertiary level hospital.在一家三级医院对儿科患者使用皮下锚定装置固定中心静脉通路装置的观察性研究。
J Vasc Access. 2020 Nov;21(6):959-962. doi: 10.1177/1129729820918460. Epub 2020 May 5.
3
SecurAstaP trial: securement with SecurAcath versus StatLock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial.SecurAstaP试验:外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管使用SecurAcath与StatLock固定的比较,一项随机开放试验。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 24;8(2):e016058. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016058.
4
Effectiveness, safety and comfort of StatLock securement for peripherally-inserted central catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis.外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管使用StatLock固定装置的有效性、安全性及舒适性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Nurs Health Sci. 2017 Dec;19(4):403-413. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12361. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
5
Venous access devices for the delivery of long-term chemotherapy: the CAVA three-arm RCT.用于长期化疗的静脉通路装置:CAVA 三臂 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jul;25(47):1-126. doi: 10.3310/hta25470.
6
Antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters for preventing neonatal bloodstream infection: the PREVAIL RCT.抗菌浸渍中央静脉导管预防新生儿血流感染:PREVAIL RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(57):1-190. doi: 10.3310/hta24570.
7
E-vita open plus for treating complex aneurysms and dissections of the thoracic aorta: a NICE medical technology guidance.用于治疗胸主动脉复杂动脉瘤和夹层的E-vita open plus:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所医疗技术指南
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Oct;12(5):485-95. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0114-9.
8
Central venous Access device SeCurement And Dressing Effectiveness for peripherally inserted central catheters in adult acute hospital patients (CASCADE): a pilot randomised controlled trial.成人急性医院患者外周静脉置入中心静脉导管的中心静脉通路装置固定与敷料有效性研究(CASCADE):一项试点随机对照试验
Trials. 2017 Oct 4;18(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2207-x.
9
Economic evaluation of peripherally inserted central catheter and other venous access devices: A scoping review.外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管及其他静脉通路装置的经济学评价:一项范围综述
J Vasc Access. 2020 Nov;21(6):826-837. doi: 10.1177/1129729819895737. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
10
Dressings and securement devices for central venous catheters (CVC).中心静脉导管(CVC)的敷料和固定装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 10;2015(9):CD010367. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010367.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Central Venous Access Device Complications and Premature Removal in Patients With Haematological Malignancies: A Multi-Site Cohort Study.血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中心静脉通路装置并发症及过早拔除:一项多中心队列研究
EJHaem. 2025 Mar 25;6(2):e1090. doi: 10.1002/jha2.1090. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Quality appraisal of clinical guidelines for peripherally inserted central catheter-related thrombosis prophylaxis in patients: a systematic review.外周置入中心静脉导管相关性血栓预防的临床指南质量评价:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 5;14(11):e084330. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084330.
3
Facilitators and barriers to evidence adoption for central venous catheters post-insertion maintenance in oncology nurses: a multi-center mixed methods study.

本文引用的文献

1
SecurAstaP trial: securement with SecurAcath versus StatLock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial.SecurAstaP试验:外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管使用SecurAcath与StatLock固定的比较,一项随机开放试验。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 24;8(2):e016058. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016058.
2
Evaluating safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of PICC securement by subcutaneously anchored stabilization device.评估皮下锚定固定装置用于经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管固定的安全性、有效性和成本效益。
J Vasc Access. 2017 May 15;18(3):238-242. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000655. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
3
The 2016 Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice.
肿瘤护理人员在中心静脉导管插入后维护中采用证据的促进因素和障碍:一项多中心混合方法研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Aug 21;23(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02242-y.
4
Preventing inadvertent drain removal using a novel catheter securement device.使用新型导管固定装置防止意外引流管脱落。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 26;13(1):16130. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37850-2.
5
Comparison of PICC and TIVAP in chemotherapy for patients with thyroid cancer.经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管与肿瘤植入式静脉输液港在甲状腺癌患者化疗中的比较
Oncol Lett. 2020 Aug;20(2):1657-1662. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11732. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
6
Subcutaneously Anchored Sutureless Device for Securement of Chest Tubes in Neonates with Pleural Effusion: Three Case Reports.皮下锚定无缝合装置用于新生儿胸腔积液胸腔引流管固定:三例病例报告
Case Rep Pediatr. 2020 Mar 10;2020:7480483. doi: 10.1155/2020/7480483. eCollection 2020.
7
[Case report on deviant care measures of a PICC line on a palliative patient].[关于一名姑息治疗患者经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)异常护理措施的病例报告]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2019 Nov;169(15-16):377-380. doi: 10.1007/s10354-019-0696-9. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
《2016年静脉输液治疗实践标准》
Home Healthc Now. 2017 Jan;35(1):10-18. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000481.
4
How Much do Needlestick Injuries Cost? A Systematic Review of the Economic Evaluations of Needlestick and Sharps Injuries Among Healthcare Personnel.针刺伤的成本是多少?对医护人员针刺伤和锐器伤经济评估的系统评价。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;37(6):635-46. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.48. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
5
Tegaderm CHG IV Securement Dressing for Central Venous and Arterial Catheter Insertion Sites: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.用于中心静脉和动脉导管插入部位的洗必泰(CHG)泰德皮肤IV固定敷料:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)医疗技术指南
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Apr;14(2):135-49. doi: 10.1007/s40258-015-0202-5.
6
Migration of indwelling central venous catheter and fatal hydrothorax.留置中心静脉导管移位与致命性胸腔积液。
European J Pediatr Surg Rep. 2014 Jun;2(1):32-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1347130. Epub 2013 May 9.
7
E-vita open plus for treating complex aneurysms and dissections of the thoracic aorta: a NICE medical technology guidance.用于治疗胸主动脉复杂动脉瘤和夹层的E-vita open plus:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所医疗技术指南
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Oct;12(5):485-95. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0114-9.
8
Reducing PICC migrations and improving patient outcomes.减少经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管的移位并改善患者预后。
Br J Nurs. 2014;23(2):S12, S14-8. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.sup1.s12.
9
Central venous catheters.中心静脉导管
BMJ. 2013 Nov 11;347:f6570. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6570.
10
A prospective postmarket study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new peripherally inserted central catheter stabilization system.一项评估新型经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管固定系统安全性和有效性的前瞻性上市后研究。
J Infus Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;36(3):181-8. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0b013e3182893690.