• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项评估新型经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管固定系统安全性和有效性的前瞻性上市后研究。

A prospective postmarket study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new peripherally inserted central catheter stabilization system.

作者信息

Egan Gail M, Siskin Gary P, Weinmann Robert, Galloway Margy M

机构信息

Community Care Physicians, Latham, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Infus Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;36(3):181-8. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0b013e3182893690.

DOI:10.1097/NAN.0b013e3182893690
PMID:23558917
Abstract

An initial postmarket study of the SecurAcath used with 5 Fr peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) was conducted with 68 adult patients at 3 different institutions in the United States. PICCs were placed in both outpatients and inpatients, with patients in critical care and medical/surgical units, home care, and extended care facilities. Sixty-two (91.2%) of the patients completed therapy without a securement-related device malfunction or device-related adverse event associated with the securement system. The device was readily accepted by both patients and nursing staff. The SecurAcath represents a novel, safe, and effective method for catheter securement.

摘要

一项针对与5F外周置入中心静脉导管(PICC)一起使用的SecurAcath的上市后初步研究,在美国3家不同机构的68名成年患者中进行。PICC被放置在门诊患者和住院患者中,包括重症监护、内科/外科病房、家庭护理和长期护理机构的患者。62名(91.2%)患者在没有与固定装置相关的故障或与固定系统相关的器械相关不良事件的情况下完成了治疗。该装置很容易被患者和护理人员接受。SecurAcath代表了一种用于导管固定的新颖、安全且有效的方法。

相似文献

1
A prospective postmarket study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new peripherally inserted central catheter stabilization system.一项评估新型经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管固定系统安全性和有效性的前瞻性上市后研究。
J Infus Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;36(3):181-8. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0b013e3182893690.
2
Peripherally inserted central catheters. Guidewire versus nonguidewire use: a comparative study.外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管。导丝使用与非导丝使用的比较研究。
J Intraven Nurs. 1992 May-Jun;15(3):152-9.
3
Prospective randomized comparative evaluation of proximal valve polyurethane and distal valve silicone peripherally inserted central catheters.前瞻性随机对照评价近端瓣膜聚亚安酯和远端瓣膜硅树脂外周置入中心导管。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010 Aug;21(8):1191-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.04.020. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
4
Complications and cost associated with parenteral nutrition delivered to hospitalized patients through either subclavian or peripherally-inserted central catheters.通过锁骨下静脉或外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管为住院患者提供肠外营养所带来的并发症及费用。
Clin Nutr. 2000 Aug;19(4):237-43. doi: 10.1054/clnu.2000.0103.
5
An observational study of the securement of central venous access devices with a subcutaneous anchor device in a paediatric population at a tertiary level hospital.在一家三级医院对儿科患者使用皮下锚定装置固定中心静脉通路装置的观察性研究。
J Vasc Access. 2020 Nov;21(6):959-962. doi: 10.1177/1129729820918460. Epub 2020 May 5.
6
Peripherally inserted central catheter usage patterns and associated symptomatic upper extremity venous thrombosis.外周置入中心静脉导管使用模式与相关的症状性上肢静脉血栓形成。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Mar;55(3):761-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.005.
7
Central venous catheters for infusion therapy in gastrointestinal cancer. A comparative study of tunnelled centrally placed catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters.用于胃肠道癌输注治疗的中心静脉导管。隧道式中心置管与外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管的对比研究。
J Intraven Nurs. 2001 Jan-Feb;24(1):38-47.
8
Impact on patient care. 2652 PIC catheter days in the alternative setting.对患者护理的影响。在替代环境中有2652个PIC导管日。
J Intraven Nurs. 1990 Nov-Dec;13(6):347-51.
9
Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in the CF population: one center's experience.囊性纤维化(CF)患者群体中经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC):单中心经验
Pediatr Nurs. 2003 Sep-Oct;29(5):355-9.
10
Peripherally inserted central catheters may lower the incidence of catheter-related blood stream infections in patients in surgical intensive care units.外周置入中心静脉导管可能会降低外科重症监护病房患者的导管相关血流感染发生率。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2011 Aug;12(4):279-82. doi: 10.1089/sur.2008.058. Epub 2010 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
SecurAcath for Securing Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.SecurAcath 用于外周静脉置入中心静脉导管固定:NICE 医疗技术指南。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Dec;16(6):779-791. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0427-1.
2
The use of advanced medical technologies at home: a systematic review of the literature.国内先进医疗技术的应用:文献系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 26;18(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5123-4.
3
SecurAstaP trial: securement with SecurAcath versus StatLock for peripherally inserted central catheters, a randomised open trial.
SecurAstaP试验:外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管使用SecurAcath与StatLock固定的比较,一项随机开放试验。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 24;8(2):e016058. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016058.
4
Catheter Securement Systems for Peripherally Inserted and Nontunneled Central Vascular Access Devices: Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Sutureless Device.用于外周插入且非隧道式中心血管通路装置的导管固定系统:一种新型无缝合装置的临床评估
J Infus Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;39(4):210-7. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000174.
5
APSIC guide for prevention of Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI).预防中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)的 APSIC 指南。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016 May 4;5:16. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0116-5. eCollection 2016.
6
Catheter securement systems: comparison of two investigational devices to a sutureless securement device, a securement dressing, and sutures in a pig model.导管固定系统:在猪模型中,将两种试验性装置与一种免缝固定装置、一种固定敷料及缝线进行比较。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2015 Dec;3(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40635-015-0060-3. Epub 2015 Aug 27.