Turkevych Marta, Turkevych Alexander, Kadjaya Albina, Gold Michael H, Lotti Torello, Sulamanidze George
Department of Pathological Anatomy and Forensic Medicine, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine.
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018 Oct;17(5):731-735. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12737. Epub 2018 Aug 19.
The use of threads in aesthetic medicine is based on its ability to stimulate collagen production, which is claimed by the manufacturers, but this information has no basis at all, as no research has been carried out that would confirm the claimed information.
To determine effectiveness of collagenogenesis as a result of setting of resorbing and permanent implants on the basis of study pathomorphological changes in the skin.
The studies were performed on 30 mature white male rats which were divided into two groups depending on the type of implanted threads.
Dependence between type of implantation thread (structure) and stimulation of collagenogenesis has been established.
While studying morphological changes in the peri-implant zone, it was found that in all groups of experimental rats, collagen with different term of biodegradation and in different quantities on various chronological stages is formed. It was established that collagenogenesis is stimulated unevenly, depending on the type of implantation thread (chemical composition and structure). On the 90th day of the experiment, the resorbing thread did not completely degrade, which does not contradict the information provided by the manufacturer about the period of disintegration (365 days), and the expediency of using these cosmetic threads in aesthetic dermatology for the purpose of prolonged lifting skin correction. The specificity of the structure of implant threads, namely, the form of a spring (AS), as a provocative factor for long-term alteration, causes long-term inflammatory response in tissues (90th day of the experiment).
美容医学中使用线是基于制造商所宣称的其刺激胶原蛋白生成的能力,但这一信息毫无依据,因为尚未开展任何研究来证实所宣称的内容。
基于对皮肤病理形态学变化的研究,确定植入可吸收和永久性植入物后胶原生成的有效性。
对30只成年雄性白色大鼠进行研究,根据植入线的类型将其分为两组。
已确定植入线类型(结构)与胶原生成刺激之间的相关性。
在研究植入物周围区域的形态学变化时发现,在所有实验组大鼠中,均形成了具有不同生物降解期限且在不同时间阶段数量各异的胶原蛋白。已确定胶原生成受到的刺激并不均匀,这取决于植入线的类型(化学成分和结构)。在实验的第90天,可吸收线并未完全降解,这与制造商提供的分解期限信息(365天)并不矛盾,且在美容皮肤科使用这些美容线进行长期提升皮肤矫正具有合理性。植入线结构的特殊性,即弹簧形式(AS),作为长期改变的激发因素,会在组织中引发长期炎症反应(实验第90天)。