Suppr超能文献

个体间神经认知表现的可变性:不受 HIV 状态或自我报告的努力程度的影响。

Intraindividual variability in neurocognitive performance: No influence due to HIV status or self-reported effort.

机构信息

a Department of Neurology , David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles , Los Angeles , CA , USA.

b Department of Psychiatry , Rush University Medical Center , Chicago , IL , USA.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2018 Dec;40(10):1044-1049. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2018.1508554. Epub 2018 Aug 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) are estimated to affect approximately 50% of infected individuals at any one time. Dispersion, a type of intraindividual variability in neurocognitive test performance, has been identified as a potential behavioral marker of HAND; however, the specificity of dispersion to HAND and how it is influenced by participant effort when taking neurocognitive tests remain unclear.

METHOD

Data were analyzed from 996 (474 HIV-, 522 HIV+) men enrolled in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS). Dispersion was calculated based on the standard deviation of an individual's test scores within a single assessment. Effort was determined using the Visual Analogue Effort Scale. Predictors of dispersion were determined using stepwise linear regression. Dispersion was compared between the HIV serostatus groups using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), considering demographic and psychosocial variables that differed between the groups.

RESULTS

Contrary to our hypothesis, dispersion was not influenced by effort. Instead, poorer neurocognitive ability and race were the sole predictors of dispersion. Dispersion did not differ between the serostatus groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that dispersion is a valid indicator of neurocognitive dysfunction that is not due to suboptimal effort; however, it is not specific to HIV and is therefore of limited utility as a behavioral marker of HIV-related neurocognitive impairment.

摘要

简介

HIV 相关的神经认知障碍(HAND)估计会在任何时候影响大约 50%的感染者。分散,即神经认知测试表现的个体内变异性的一种类型,已被确定为 HAND 的潜在行为标志物;然而,分散对 HAND 的特异性以及它如何受到参与者在进行神经认知测试时的努力的影响尚不清楚。

方法

对参加多中心艾滋病队列研究(MACS)的 996 名男性(474 名 HIV-,522 名 HIV+)的数据进行了分析。分散度是根据个体在单次评估中的测试分数的标准差来计算的。使用视觉模拟努力量表来确定努力程度。使用逐步线性回归来确定分散的预测因素。使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)比较 HIV 血清状态组之间的分散度,考虑到两组之间存在差异的人口统计学和心理社会变量。

结果

与我们的假设相反,分散度不受努力的影响。相反,较差的神经认知能力和种族是分散度的唯一预测因素。血清状态组之间的分散度没有差异。

结论

我们的结果表明,分散度是神经认知功能障碍的有效指标,不是由于努力不足所致;然而,它不是 HIV 特有的,因此作为 HIV 相关神经认知障碍的行为标志物的效用有限。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验