Newman Jared M, Sodhi Nipun, Khlopas Anton, Sultan Assem A, Chughtai Morad, Abraham Roby, Oh Jason, Molloy Robert M, Harwin Steven F, Mont Michael A
Orthopedics. 2018 Sep 1;41(5):263-273. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180815-05. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
This review evaluated (1) original and newer cementless implants; (2) outcomes of newer designs; (3) risks and benefits; and (4) newer cementless vs cemented total knee arthroplasties. A search for all reports on cementless total knee arthroplasties published from January 2010 to April 2017 was performed, and 31 studies were included for final analysis. Newer cementless total knee arthroplasty designs have shown excellent survivorship, functional outcomes, and satisfaction rates in both young and elderly populations. Compared with cement fixation, there may be potential benefits with the newer cementless implants. However, these findings need to be further substantiated with additional studies reporting longer-term results. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):263-273.].
(1)原始的和新型的非骨水泥型植入物;(2)新型设计的结果;(3)风险和益处;以及(4)新型非骨水泥型与骨水泥型全膝关节置换术的比较。检索了2010年1月至2017年4月发表的所有关于非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术的报告,最终纳入31项研究进行分析。新型非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术设计在年轻和老年人群中均显示出优异的生存率、功能结果和满意度。与骨水泥固定相比,新型非骨水泥型植入物可能具有潜在益处。然而,这些发现需要更多报告长期结果的研究进一步证实。[《骨科》。2018年;41(5):263 - 273。]