• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在急诊科中的应用:预后价值的回顾性评估。

Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment sepsis score in an emergency department setting: Retrospective assessment of prognostic value.

机构信息

Infection Service, Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.

Emergency Department, Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2019 Jun;31(3):339-346. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13154. Epub 2018 Aug 20.

DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.13154
PMID:30126044
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Use of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score has been proposed by the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock. The utility in the ED is not yet well established. We retrospectively studied the application of a modified SOFA (mSOFA) score, to assess its ability to predict mortality.

METHODS

At our urban tertiary teaching hospital staff recorded patients with probable sepsis in the ED Information System (EDIS). Data was analysed for the year of July 2015 to June 2016. For a sample of the suspected sepsis patients, ED and inpatient clinical records were manually reviewed to ascribe an mSOFA score and assess its performance in predicting mortality, with a primary outcome of death by 30 days.

RESULTS

There were 474 patients recorded over the 1 year with probable sepsis, of whom 228 were manually reviewed. The mSOFA was a significant predictor of mortality at all the time points tested. The 30 day mortality was 22/88 (25%) for those with a positive mSOFA score and 3 out of 140 (2.1%) of those with a negative mSOFA score (OR 15.2, 95% CI [4.4, 52.7]; P < 0.001). This equated to a negative predictive value of 97.9% (95% exact CI 93.9-99.6%).

CONCLUSION

For ED patients thought likely to have sepsis, the mSOFA score distinguished those with a high or low mortality risk. The high negative predictive value could be practically useful. Prospective study of the mSOFA score used in ED will be needed to validate these observations.

摘要

目的

序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分已被第三届国际脓毒症和脓毒性休克定义共识提出。其在急诊科的应用尚未得到充分证实。我们回顾性研究了改良 SOFA(mSOFA)评分的应用,以评估其预测死亡率的能力。

方法

在我们的城市三级教学医院,工作人员在急诊科信息系统(EDIS)中记录疑似脓毒症患者。对 2015 年 7 月至 2016 年 6 月的数据进行分析。对疑似脓毒症患者的样本,对急诊科和住院部的临床记录进行手动审查,以确定 mSOFA 评分,并评估其在预测死亡率方面的表现,主要结局为 30 天内死亡。

结果

在 1 年的时间里,有 474 名患者记录在案,其中 228 名患者进行了手动审查。mSOFA 是所有测试时间点死亡率的显著预测因子。mSOFA 评分阳性患者 30 天死亡率为 22/88(25%),mSOFA 评分阴性患者为 3/140(2.1%)(OR 15.2,95%CI [4.4, 52.7];P < 0.001)。这相当于阴性预测值为 97.9%(95%精确 CI 93.9-99.6%)。

结论

对于急诊科疑似患有脓毒症的患者,mSOFA 评分可以区分高死亡率和低死亡率风险的患者。高阴性预测值可能具有实际应用价值。需要前瞻性研究 mSOFA 评分在急诊科的应用,以验证这些观察结果。

相似文献

1
Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment sepsis score in an emergency department setting: Retrospective assessment of prognostic value.改良序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在急诊科中的应用:预后价值的回顾性评估。
Emerg Med Australas. 2019 Jun;31(3):339-346. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13154. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
2
Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for predicting mortality in emergency department patients with sepsis.用于预测急诊科脓毒症患者死亡率的改良序贯器官衰竭评估评分
Emerg Med Australas. 2023 Jun;35(3):504-509. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14180. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
3
Predictive performance of the SOFA and mSOFA scoring systems for predicting in-hospital mortality in the emergency department.SOFA 和 mSOFA 评分系统对急诊科住院患者病死率预测的预测性能。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;37(7):1237-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
4
Validation of the Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score and Evaluation of Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock Definitions in the Pediatric Emergency Department.验证儿科序贯性器官衰竭评估评分,并评估儿科急诊中第三代国际脓毒症和脓毒性休克定义的共识定义。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Jul 1;176(7):672-678. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.1301.
5
Clinical outcome prediction of acute neurological patients admitted to the emergency department: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and modified SOFA score.急诊急性神经科患者的临床预后预测:序贯器官衰竭评估评分和改良 SOFA 评分。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 30;11:1264159. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1264159. eCollection 2023.
6
New Sepsis Definition (Sepsis-3) and Community-acquired Pneumonia Mortality. A Validation and Clinical Decision-Making Study.新的脓毒症定义 (Sepsis-3) 与社区获得性肺炎死亡率。一项验证和临床决策研究。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov 15;196(10):1287-1297. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201611-2262OC.
7
Sepsis patients in the emergency department: stratification using the Clinical Impression Score, Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ dysfunction score or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score?急诊科脓毒症患者:使用临床印象评分、易感性、感染、反应和器官功能障碍评分或快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分进行分层?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;25(5):328-334. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000460.
8
Prognostic Accuracy of Sepsis-3 Criteria for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Suspected Infection Presenting to the Emergency Department.Sepsis-3 标准对急诊科疑似感染患者住院死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):301-308. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20329.
9
Clinical Scores and Formal Triage for Screening of Sepsis and Adverse Outcomes on Arrival in an Emergency Department All-Comer Cohort.急诊科全人群队列中用于筛查脓毒症及入院时不良结局的临床评分与正式分诊
J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;57(4):453-460.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.06.036. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
10
Sepsis Clinical Criteria in Emergency Department Patients Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit: An External Validation Study of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.入住重症监护病房的急诊科患者的脓毒症临床标准:快速序贯器官衰竭评估的外部验证研究
J Emerg Med. 2017 May;52(5):622-631. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Tools for Screening, Predicting, and Evaluating Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Comprehensive Review.脓毒症和脓毒性休克的筛查、预测及评估工具:一项全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Aug 18;16(8):e67137. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67137. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Application Prospect of the SOFA Score and Related Modification Research Progress in Sepsis.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在脓毒症中的应用前景及相关修正研究进展
J Clin Med. 2023 May 16;12(10):3493. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103493.
3
Ability of a modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score to predict mortality among sepsis patients in a resource-limited setting.
改良序贯器官衰竭评估评分预测资源有限环境下脓毒症患者死亡率的能力。
Acute Crit Care. 2022 Aug;37(3):363-371. doi: 10.4266/acc.2021.01627. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
4
Role of qSOFA and SOFA Scoring Systems for Predicting In-Hospital Risk of Deterioration in the Emergency Department.qSOFA 和 SOFA 评分系统在急诊科预测住院期间恶化风险的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 12;17(22):8367. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228367.
5
Prevalence of organ failure and mortality among patients in the emergency department: a population-based cohort study.急诊科患者器官衰竭和死亡的患病率:一项基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 30;9(10):e032692. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032692.
6
Human Errors and Adverse Hemodynamic Events Related to "Push Dose Pressors" in the Emergency Department.急诊中与“推注剂量升压药”相关的人为失误和不良血液动力学事件。
J Med Toxicol. 2019 Oct;15(4):276-286. doi: 10.1007/s13181-019-00716-z. Epub 2019 Jul 3.