• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparative clinical study of Sulbactam and ampicillin and clindamycin and tobramycin in infections of soft tissues.

作者信息

Stromberg B V, Reines H D, Hunt P

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Jun;162(6):575-8.

PMID:3012808
Abstract

A prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of Sulbactam (a new semisynthetic, injectable penicillanic acid sulfone) to inhibit beta-lactamase activity of bacteria in infections of the soft tissue. Sixty patients with documented soft tissue infections were prospectively randomized. One-half received 1 gram of Sulbactam per 2 grams of ampicillin every six hours. The other half received 600.0 milligrams of clindamycin every six hours and 1.5 milligrams per kilogram of tobramycin every eight hours. Patient groups were similar in age, sex, associated medical problems and bacteriologic flora of wounds. Sulbactam and ampicillin showed a 93 per cent cure rate or improvement as compared with 81 per cent in the clindamycin and tobramycin group. Eradication of organisms was better in the Sulbactam and ampicillin group (67 versus 35 per cent). Antibiotic activity of ampicillin was significantly augmented by the addition of Sulbactam. Of the 223 total bacteriologic isolates, 38 per cent were sensitive to ampicillin alone. Addition of Sulbactam improved sensitivity to 70 per cent. The Sulbactam and ampicillin combination is an effective combination for the treatment of soft tissue infections.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparative clinical study of Sulbactam and ampicillin and clindamycin and tobramycin in infections of soft tissues.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Jun;162(6):575-8.
2
A randomized controlled trial of ampicillin plus sulbactam vs. gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections: a preliminary report. Study Group of Intraabdominal Infections.氨苄西林加舒巴坦与庆大霉素加克林霉素治疗腹腔内感染的随机对照试验:初步报告。腹腔内感染研究组
Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Nov-Dec;8 Suppl 5:S583-8.
3
The role of Pseudomonas species in patients treated with ampicillin and Sulbactam for gangrenous and perforated appendicitis.假单胞菌属在接受氨苄西林和舒巴坦治疗的坏疽性和穿孔性阑尾炎患者中的作用。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985 Oct;161(4):303-7.
4
A randomized, double-blind comparison of sulbactam/ampicillin and clindamycin for the treatment of aerobic and aerobic-anaerobic infections.舒巴坦/氨苄西林与克林霉素治疗需氧菌及需氧-厌氧菌感染的随机双盲对照研究
Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Nov-Dec;8 Suppl 5:S569-75. doi: 10.1093/clinids/8.supplement_5.s569.
5
Ampicillin/sulbactam vs. clindamycin/gentamicin in the treatment of postpartum endometritis.氨苄西林/舒巴坦与克林霉素/庆大霉素治疗产后子宫内膜炎的比较
J Reprod Med. 1996 Aug;41(8):575-80.
6
Ampicillin/sulbactam versus cefazolin or cefoxitin in the treatment of skin and skin-structure infections of bacterial etiology.氨苄西林/舒巴坦与头孢唑林或头孢西丁治疗细菌性皮肤及皮肤结构感染的比较
Adv Ther. 1995 Mar-Apr;12(2):139-46.
7
Ampicillin/sulbactam and cefoxitin in the treatment of cutaneous and other soft-tissue abscesses in patients with or without histories of injection drug abuse.
Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Aug;31(2):464-71. doi: 10.1086/313971. Epub 2000 Sep 14.
8
A randomized controlled trial of moxalactam versus clindamycin/tobramycin in the treatment of mixed anaerobic/aerobic infections.一项比较羟羧氧酰胺菌素与克林霉素/妥布霉素治疗需氧菌与厌氧菌混合感染的随机对照试验。
Am Surg. 1986 Sep;52(9):467-71.
9
Antibiotics in infections of the biliary tract.抗生素在胆道感染中的应用
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987 Oct;165(4):285-92.
10
Comparative evaluation of the in vitro activity of three combinations of beta-lactams with beta-lactamase inhibitors: piperacillin/tazobactam, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid and ampicillin/sulbactam.β-内酰胺类与β-内酰胺酶抑制剂三种组合(哌拉西林/他唑巴坦、替卡西林/克拉维酸和氨苄西林/舒巴坦)体外活性的比较评价
Braz J Infect Dis. 2000 Feb;4(1):22-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Ampicillin/sulbactam: current status in severe bacterial infections.氨苄西林/舒巴坦:在严重细菌感染中的现状
Drugs. 2007;67(13):1829-49. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767130-00003.
2
Sulbactam/ampicillin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use.
Drugs. 1987 Jun;33(6):577-609. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198733060-00003.