• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Ampicillin/sulbactam and cefoxitin in the treatment of cutaneous and other soft-tissue abscesses in patients with or without histories of injection drug abuse.

作者信息

Talan D A, Summanen P H, Finegold S M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Olive View-University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Sylmar, CA 91342, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Aug;31(2):464-71. doi: 10.1086/313971. Epub 2000 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1086/313971
PMID:10987706
Abstract

A randomized, double-blind trial compared the clinical and bacteriologic efficacy of ampicillin/sulbactam (2 g/1 g) and cefoxitin (2 g) administered intravenously every 6 h to patients with (n=49) or without (n=47) histories of injection drug abuse who presented with cutaneous or other soft-tissue infections. Cure or improvement occurred in 89.8% of ampicillin/sulbactam-treated patients, compared with 93.6% of cefoxitin-treated patients. The median time to resolution of all symptoms was 10.5 days with ampicillin/sulbactam treatment and 15.5 days with cefoxitin treatment. Mixed aerobic-anaerobic infection was encountered frequently in both treatment groups. A significantly higher percentage of Streptococcus species was found in the major abscesses of the patients with histories of injection drug abuse, compared with those without such histories (37% vs. 19%, respectively; P=.0009). Overall, ampicillin/sulbactam eradicated pathogens from the major abscesses in 100% of patients, whereas the eradication rate with cefoxitin was 97.9%. The 2 drugs were well tolerated. Ampicillin/sulbactam and cefoxitin were equally effective for the empirical treatment of cutaneous or other soft-tissue infections in injection drug abusers and patients who did not inject drugs.

摘要

相似文献

1
Ampicillin/sulbactam and cefoxitin in the treatment of cutaneous and other soft-tissue abscesses in patients with or without histories of injection drug abuse.
Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Aug;31(2):464-71. doi: 10.1086/313971. Epub 2000 Sep 14.
2
Ampicillin/sulbactam versus cefazolin or cefoxitin in the treatment of skin and skin-structure infections of bacterial etiology.氨苄西林/舒巴坦与头孢唑林或头孢西丁治疗细菌性皮肤及皮肤结构感染的比较
Adv Ther. 1995 Mar-Apr;12(2):139-46.
3
A comparison of ampicillin/sulbactam and cefoxitin in the treatment of bacterial skin and skin-structure infections.
Adv Ther. 1994 Jul-Aug;11(4):183-91.
4
Ampicillin-sulbactam versus cefoxitin for prophylaxis in high-risk patients undergoing abdominal surgery.氨苄西林-舒巴坦与头孢西丁用于腹部手术高危患者预防感染的比较。
Pharmacotherapy. 1994 Nov-Dec;14(6):734-9.
5
Ampicillin/sulbactam compared with cefotaxime in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections of bacterial etiology.氨苄西林/舒巴坦与头孢噻肟治疗细菌性病因的下呼吸道感染的比较。
Adv Ther. 1995 Jan-Feb;12(1):62-71.
6
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of ampicillin-sulbactam versus cefoxitin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections.
Pharmacotherapy. 1998 Jan-Feb;18(1):175-83.
7
Single-agent therapy for acute pelvic inflammatory disease: sulbactam/ampicillin versus cefoxitin.
J Int Med Res. 1990;18 Suppl 4:85D-89D.
8
Conversion of treatment from cefoxitin to ampicillin/sulbactam: experience in a university teaching hospital.
Adv Ther. 1995 Jan-Feb;12(1):30-43.
9
[Acute bacterial salpingitis. The importance of residual inflammation. A comparative study with celioscopic control of 2 antibiotic protocols: sulbactam-ampicillin versus cefoxitin].
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1990;19(6):765-72.
10
Therapeutic interchange of ampicillin-sulbactam for cefoxitin.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1991 Oct;48(10):2150-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Cefepime and Ampicillin/Sulbactam on Preventing Post-Cesarean Surgical Site Infections, Randomized Controlled Trail.头孢吡肟和氨苄西林/舒巴坦对预防剖宫产术后手术部位感染的影响,随机对照试验
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Nov 27;12(12):1666. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12121666.
2
Insufficient Representation of Patients With Obesity in Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Antimicrobials for Treatment of Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Scoping Review.评估抗菌药物治疗皮肤和皮肤结构感染有效性及安全性的随机对照试验中肥胖患者代表性不足:一项范围综述
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Mar 20;10(3):ofad144. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad144. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Simulations of Ampicillin and Sulbactam in Hospitalised Adult Patients.
群体药代动力学和氨苄西林-舒巴坦在住院成年患者中的剂量模拟。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 Apr;62(4):573-586. doi: 10.1007/s40262-023-01219-5. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
4
Soft Tissue, Bone, and Joint Infections in People Who Inject Drugs.注射吸毒人群中的软组织、骨和关节感染。
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2020 Sep;34(3):495-509. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2020.06.007.
5
Local complications of pentazocine abuse: Case report and review.喷他佐辛滥用的局部并发症:病例报告及文献复习
Ind Psychiatry J. 2018 Jul-Dec;27(2):296-301. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_53_17.
6
Microbiology and initial antibiotic therapy for injection drug users and non-injection drug users with cutaneous abscesses in the era of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌时代,注射吸毒者和非注射吸毒者皮肤脓肿的微生物学及初始抗生素治疗
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;22(8):993-7. doi: 10.1111/acem.12727. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
7
Tigecycline in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal and complicated skin and skin structure infections.替加环素治疗复杂性腹腔内感染和复杂性皮肤软组织感染。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007 Dec;3(6):1059-70.
8
Ampicillin/sulbactam: current status in severe bacterial infections.氨苄西林/舒巴坦:在严重细菌感染中的现状
Drugs. 2007;67(13):1829-49. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767130-00003.
9
Clinical role of beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations.β-内酰胺类/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂联合制剂的临床作用。
Drugs. 2003;63(14):1511-24. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363140-00006.
10
A practical guide to the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections.复杂皮肤及软组织感染治疗实用指南
Drugs. 2003;63(14):1459-80. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363140-00003.