• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于社会生态理论的教育对学生欺凌行为的影响:一项教育研究。

Effect of education based on socio-ecological theory on bullying in students: an educational study.

作者信息

Shams Hedayatallah, Garmaroudi Gholamreza, Nedjat Saharnaz, Yekaninejad Mir Saeed

机构信息

PhD. Candidate in Health Education and Promotion, School of Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

MD, MPH Chair, Department of Health Promotion and Education; Associate Professor of Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Electron Physician. 2018 Jul 25;10(7):7046-7053. doi: 10.19082/7046. eCollection 2018 Jul.

DOI:10.19082/7046
PMID:30128095
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6092146/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bullying and victimization behaviors are a serious problem for students, peers, parents, and school teachers. These behaviors usually persist and cause communication problems.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of education based on the socio-ecological theory on bullying in students.

METHODS

This educational study was of the field-trial type, and carried out on 237 middle school students in Gonabad City (Iran), from September 2015 to May 2016. The intervention group consisted of 147 students, and 90 were assigned to a control group. The intervention (Five sessions of bullying and victimization were discussed) based socio-ecological theory at two levels: individual level and interpersonal level. The intervention was carried out on the students, their parents, and school teachers in two schools. To this end, the multi-stage random sampling was done. Prior to the intervention, the Illinois questionnaire as well as a researcher-made questionnaire was completed. The researcher-made questionnaire included demographic characteristics with regard to living with both parents, one parent or no parents (a guardian) and questions about bullying behaviors in the family as well as about knowledge and attitudes towards bullying. Subsequently, the questionnaire was completed by the students one month and six months after the intervention. The data was analyzed by IBM-SPSS version 21, using ANOVA, multiple regression, repeated measures, Chi-square, and Man-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

The findings showed that there was no significant difference between the mean attitude of the students before and after training. However, the mean score of bullying behaviors in the experimental group was significantly reduced one month after the intervention, but it increased after six months. Moreover, there was a significant difference in terms of bullying behaviors between the intervention and control groups (p=0.0001). Furthermore, a significant relationship was found between the mothers' education level and the students' bullying behaviors (p=0.009.

CONCLUSION

Bullying is an important problem that affects schools and influences the academic and social capabilities of students. In this regard, the role of educators is the most important, and education on the basis of the socio-ecological model was proved to be effective in reducing bullying. Therefore, educational intervention should be taken at two levels of school and family.

摘要

背景

欺凌和受欺负行为对于学生、同龄人、家长及学校教师而言是一个严重问题。这些行为通常会持续存在并引发沟通问题。

目的

确定基于社会生态理论的教育对学生欺凌行为的影响。

方法

本教育研究为现场试验类型,于2015年9月至2016年5月在伊朗戈纳巴德市的237名中学生中开展。干预组有147名学生,90名被分配到对照组。基于社会生态理论的干预(讨论五节关于欺凌和受欺负的课程)分两个层面进行:个人层面和人际层面。干预在两所学校的学生、家长及学校教师中开展。为此,采用了多阶段随机抽样。干预前,完成了伊利诺伊问卷以及一份研究者自编问卷。研究者自编问卷包括关于与父母双方、一方或无父母(监护人)同住的人口统计学特征,以及关于家庭中的欺凌行为以及对欺凌的认知和态度的问题。随后,在干预后1个月和6个月由学生完成该问卷。数据采用IBM-SPSS 21版进行分析,使用方差分析、多元回归、重复测量、卡方检验和曼-惠特尼U检验。

结果

研究结果表明,学生培训前后的平均态度之间无显著差异。然而,干预组的欺凌行为平均得分在干预后1个月显著降低,但6个月后有所上升。此外,干预组和对照组在欺凌行为方面存在显著差异(p = 0.0001)。此外,发现母亲的教育水平与学生的欺凌行为之间存在显著关系(p = 0.009)。

结论

欺凌是一个影响学校且会影响学生学业和社交能力的重要问题。在这方面,教育工作者的作用最为重要,且事实证明基于社会生态模型的教育在减少欺凌方面是有效的。因此,应在学校和家庭两个层面进行教育干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/838c/6092146/3ed471a7a19e/EPJ-10-7046-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/838c/6092146/3ed471a7a19e/EPJ-10-7046-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/838c/6092146/3ed471a7a19e/EPJ-10-7046-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of education based on socio-ecological theory on bullying in students: an educational study.基于社会生态理论的教育对学生欺凌行为的影响:一项教育研究。
Electron Physician. 2018 Jul 25;10(7):7046-7053. doi: 10.19082/7046. eCollection 2018 Jul.
2
The Effect of an Anti-Bullying Intervention on Male Students' Bullying-victimization Behaviors and Social Competence: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Deprived Urban Areas.一项反欺凌干预措施对男学生欺凌-受欺凌行为及社会能力的影响:在城市贫困地区进行的随机对照试验
J Res Health Sci. 2019 Oct 21;19(4):e00461.
3
An Analysis of the Association between School Bullying Prevention and Control Measures and Secondary School Students' Bullying Behavior in Jiangsu Province.江苏省学校欺凌防治措施与中学生欺凌行为的关联分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Nov 20;13(11):954. doi: 10.3390/bs13110954.
4
Moderating effects of socio-ecological factors on the relationship between adolescent exposure to media violence and attitudes towards school bullying.社会生态因素对青少年接触媒体暴力与对校园欺凌态度之间关系的调节作用。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Nov;76(11):2921-2932. doi: 10.1111/jan.14478. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
5
The effectiveness of Rock and Water in improving students' socio-emotional adjustment and social safety: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.岩-水疗法对改善学生社会情感调整和社会安全的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychol. 2018 Jul 25;6(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40359-018-0247-y.
6
The Effect of an Education Program on Attitudes and Beliefs about Bullying and Bullying Behaviour in Junior Secondary School Students.一项教育计划对初中生关于欺凌及欺凌行为的态度和信念的影响。
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2007 Feb;12(1):21-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2006.00417.x.
7
Effect of educational intervention on physical activity-related knowledge, attitude and behavior of among first-grade students of male high schools.教育干预对男子高中一年级学生体育活动相关知识、态度和行为的影响。
J Educ Health Promot. 2013 Jan 31;2:4. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.106642. eCollection 2013.
8
Student-teacher conflict moderates the link between students' social status in the classroom and involvement in bullying behaviors and exposure to peer victimization.师生冲突调节了学生在课堂上的社会地位与参与欺凌行为以及遭受同伴侵害之间的联系。
J Adolesc. 2021 Feb;87:86-97. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
9
The effect of educational intervention based on the self-efficacy theory of high school students in adopting preventive behaviors of COVID-19.基于自我效能理论的教育干预对高中生采取新冠肺炎预防行为的影响。
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Nov 26;11:383. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_274_22. eCollection 2022.
10
The child-to-family education program regarding self-medication: A theory-based interventional study.儿童家庭用药教育方案:基于理论的干预研究。
J Mother Child. 2022 Jul 20;26(1):10-17. doi: 10.34763/jmotherandchild.20222601.d-22-00009. eCollection 2022 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Commit to Be Fit framework: a community case study of a multi-level, holistic school-based wellness initiative in rural Virginia.Commit to Be Fit 框架:弗吉尼亚农村地区一项多层次、整体化的基于学校的健康促进社区案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 16;11:1067454. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1067454. eCollection 2023.
2
Application Optimization of University Aesthetic Education Resources Based on Few-Shot Learning from the Perspective of Ecological Aesthetic Education.基于生态审美教育的少样本学习视角下的大学审美教育资源的应用优化。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Apr 22;2022:4248778. doi: 10.1155/2022/4248778. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Overlapping verbal, relational, physical, and electronic forms of bullying in adolescence: influence of school context.青少年时期言语、关系、身体和电子形式的欺凌行为存在重叠:学校环境的影响。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2015;44(3):494-508. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2014.893516. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
2
Morbidity among bystanders of bullying behavior at school: concepts, concerns, and clinical/research issues.学校欺凌行为旁观者的发病率:概念、关注点及临床/研究问题
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2011 Nov 4;24(1):11-6. doi: 10.1515/ijamh.2012.003.
3
Examining school-based bullying interventions using multilevel discrete time hazard modeling.
使用多层次离散时间风险模型考察基于学校的欺凌干预措施。
Prev Sci. 2012 Oct;13(5):539-50. doi: 10.1007/s11121-012-0280-7.
4
The effect of assertiveness training on student's academic anxiety.自信训练对学生学业焦虑的影响。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2012 Mar;62(3 Suppl 2):S37-41.
5
School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber.美国青少年中的校园欺凌:身体、言语、关系和网络。
J Adolesc Health. 2009 Oct;45(4):368-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.021. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
6
Personal and interpersonal correlates of bullying behaviors among Korean middle school students.韩国中学生欺凌行为的个人和人际相关因素。
J Interpers Violence. 2010 Jan;25(1):152-76. doi: 10.1177/0886260508329124. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
7
Bullying and symptoms of depression in chilean middle school students.智利中学生中的欺凌行为与抑郁症状
J Sch Health. 2009 Mar;79(3):130-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.0397.x.
8
Adolescent risk correlates of bullying and different types of victimization.欺凌及不同类型受欺负行为的青少年风险相关因素。
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2006 Oct-Dec;18(4):575-86. doi: 10.1515/ijamh.2006.18.4.575.