Peckham Allie, Rudoler David, Li Joyce M, D'Souza Sandra
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, North American Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Toronto, ON.
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, ON, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON.
Healthc Policy. 2018 Aug;14(1):30-43. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2018.25550.
This paper considers one of Ontario's largest reform efforts: the Aging at Home Strategy (AHS). The AHS was initiated in 2007 to enable people to live independent lives in their own homes. A document review was conducted on relevant government materials to assess the goals and objectives of the AHS as it was rolled out over the course of three years. The findings identify that by the third year of the AHS, there was a reduction in the discretionary powers of the regional health authorities to allocate funds based on local priorities. These findings also highlight that the "mainstream" subsectors of the healthcare system - medical and hospital services - and those outside the mainstream (or the "marginal" subsectors) face different institutional boundaries, policy legacies, political actors and policy agendas. While interests within the mainstream subsector are organized and institutionalized, the marginal subsectors are fragmented, creating a power imbalance where the priorities of the mainstream subsector dominate.
居家养老战略(AHS)。AHS于2007年启动,旨在让人们能够在自己家中独立生活。我们对相关政府材料进行了文献综述,以评估AHS在三年推行过程中的目标。研究结果表明,到AHS实施的第三年,地区卫生当局根据地方优先事项分配资金的自由裁量权有所减少。这些结果还凸显出,医疗保健系统的“主流”子部门——医疗和医院服务——与主流之外的部门(或“边缘”子部门)面临着不同的制度边界、政策遗留问题、政治行为体和政策议程。虽然主流子部门内的利益是有组织且制度化的,但边缘子部门则是分散的,这造成了一种权力不平衡,即主流子部门的优先事项占据主导地位。