Ruehland Warren R, Rochford Peter D, Trinder John, Spong Jo, O'Donoghue Fergal J
Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine (Austin Health), University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2019 Jan;259:93-103. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
Respiratory related evoked potentials (RREP) were used to examine respiratory stimulus gating. RREPs produced by consciously detected vs. undetected loads, near the detection threshold, were compared. Participants (n = 17) were instrumented with EEG and a nasal mask connected to a loading manifold, which presented a range of mid-inspiratory resistive loads, plus a control, in a random block design. Participants were cued prior to the stimulus and signalled detection by a button press. There were statistically significant differences in peak-to-peak amplitude of the P1 RREP peak for detected (mean ± SD; 3.86 ± 1.45 μV; P = 0.020) and undetected loads (3.67 ± 1.27 μV; P = 0.002) vs. control (2.36 ± 0.81 μV), although baseline-to-peak differences were not significantly different. In contrast peak-to-peak P3 amplitude was significantly greater for detected (5.91 ± 1.54 μV; P < 0.001) but not undetected loads (3.33 ± 0.98 μV; P = 0.189) vs. control (3.69 ± 1.46 μV), with the same pattern observed for baseline-to-peak measurements. The P1 peak, thought to reflect arrival of somatosensory information, appeared to be present in response to both detected and undetected loads, but the later P3 peak, was present for detected loads only. This suggests that for sub-threshold loads sensory information may reach the cortex, arguing against a sub-cortical gating process.
呼吸相关诱发电位(RREP)被用于检测呼吸刺激门控。比较了在检测阈值附近,由有意识检测到的负荷与未检测到的负荷所产生的RREP。17名参与者被连接上脑电图(EEG)设备以及与加载歧管相连的鼻罩,加载歧管以随机区组设计呈现一系列吸气中期的阻力负荷,外加一个对照负荷。在刺激前向参与者发出提示,参与者通过按键来示意检测到负荷。与对照(2.36±0.81μV)相比,检测到的负荷(均值±标准差;3.86±1.45μV;P = 0.020)和未检测到的负荷(3.67±1.27μV;P = 0.002)的P1 RREP峰的峰峰值幅度存在统计学显著差异,尽管基线到峰值的差异无显著不同。相比之下,与对照(3.69±1.46μV)相比,检测到的负荷(5.91±1.54μV;P < 0.001)的P3峰峰值幅度显著更大,但未检测到的负荷(3.33±0.98μV;P = 0.189)则不然,基线到峰值测量也观察到相同模式。被认为反映体感信息到达的P1峰,似乎在对检测到和未检测到的负荷做出反应时均出现,但较晚出现的P3峰仅在检测到负荷时出现。这表明对于阈下负荷,感觉信息可能会到达皮层,这与皮层下门控过程相悖。