Suppr超能文献

单药治疗失败后强化治疗的时间及其与 93515 例 2 型糖尿病患者后续血糖控制的关系。

Time to Treatment Intensification After Monotherapy Failure and Its Association With Subsequent Glycemic Control Among 93,515 Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.

机构信息

Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA

Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2018 Oct;41(10):2096-2104. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0662. Epub 2018 Aug 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the association between the timing of treatment intensification and subsequent glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes in whom monotherapy fails.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective analysis of the U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink database focused on patients with type 2 diabetes and one or more HbA measurements ≥7% (≥53 mmol/mol) after ≥3 months of metformin or sulfonylurea monotherapy (first measurement meeting these criteria was taken as the study index date). Baseline (6 months before the index date) characteristics were stratified by time from the index date to intensification (early: <12 months; intermediate: 12 to <24 months; late: 24 to <36 months). Intensification was defined as initiating after the index date one or more noninsulin antidiabetes medication in addition to metformin or a sulfonylurea. Association between time to intensification and subsequent glycemic control (first HbA <7% [<53 mmol/mol] after intensification) was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard models that accounted for baseline differences.

RESULTS

Of the 93,515 patients who met the study criteria (mean age 60 years; ∼59% male; 80% taking metformin), 23,761 (25%) intensified <12 months after the index date; 11,908 (13%) intensified after 12 to <24 months; and 7,146 (8%) intensified after 24 to <36 months. Patients who intensified treatment ≥36 months after the index date ( = 9,638 [10%]) and those with no evidence of treatment intensification during the observable follow-up period ( = 41,062 [44%]) were not included in further analyses. The median times from intensification to control were 20.0, 24.1, and 25.7 months, respectively, for the early, intermediate, and late intensification cohorts. After adjustment for baseline differences, the likelihood of attaining glycemic control was 22% and 28% lower for patients in the intermediate and late intensification groups, respectively, compared with those intensifying early ( < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Earlier treatment intensification is associated with shorter time to subsequent glycemic control, independent of whether patients initiate first-line treatment with metformin or a sulfonylurea.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估 2 型糖尿病患者在单一药物治疗失败后,强化治疗时机与后续血糖控制之间的关联。

研究设计和方法

本研究是对英国临床实践研究数据链数据库的回顾性分析,纳入了接受二甲双胍或磺酰脲类药物单一治疗≥3 个月后,HbA1c 测量值≥7%(≥53mmol/mol)的 2 型糖尿病患者。(首次满足这些标准的测量值被视为研究索引日期。)根据距强化治疗开始的时间,将基线(索引日期前 6 个月)特征分为早期(<12 个月)、中期(12 至<24 个月)和晚期(24 至<36 个月)。强化治疗定义为索引日期后,除二甲双胍或磺酰脲类药物外,再使用一种或多种非胰岛素类降糖药物。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析和 Cox 比例风险模型评估强化治疗时间与后续血糖控制(强化治疗后首次 HbA1c<7%[<53mmol/mol])之间的关联,该模型考虑了基线差异。

结果

在符合研究标准的 93515 名患者中(平均年龄 60 岁;约 59%为男性;80%服用二甲双胍),23761 名(25%)患者在索引日期后<12 个月强化治疗;11908 名(13%)患者在 12 至<24 个月强化治疗;7146 名(8%)患者在 24 至<36 个月强化治疗。在索引日期后≥36 个月强化治疗的患者(=9638[10%])和在可观察随访期间无强化治疗证据的患者(=41062[44%])未纳入进一步分析。早期、中期和晚期强化治疗组从强化治疗到控制的中位时间分别为 20.0、24.1 和 25.7 个月。在调整基线差异后,与早期强化治疗患者相比,中期和晚期强化治疗患者达到血糖控制的可能性分别低 22%和 28%(<0.0001)。

结论

早期治疗强化与后续血糖控制的时间更短相关,与患者是否起始一线治疗使用二甲双胍或磺酰脲类药物无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验