Medicine Service, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO.
Division of Biomedical Informatics and Personalized Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jun 2;45(6):1335-1345. doi: 10.2337/dc21-2492.
Therapeutic inertia threatens the potential long-term benefits of achieving early glycemic control after type 2 diabetes diagnosis. We evaluated temporal trends in second-line diabetes medication initiation among individuals initially treated with metformin.
We included data from 199,042 adults with type 2 diabetes in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs health care system initially treated with metformin monotherapy from 2005 to 2013. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards and linear regression to estimate associations of year of metformin monotherapy initiation with time to second-line diabetes treatment over 5 years of follow-up (primary outcome) and with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at the time of second-line diabetes treatment initiation (secondary outcome).
The cumulative 5-year incidence of second-line medication initiation declined from 47% among metformin initiators in 2005 to 36% in 2013 counterparts (P < 0.0001) despite a gradual increase in mean HbA1c at the end of follow-up (from 6.94 ± 1.28% to 7.09 ± 1.42%, Ptrend < 0.0001). In comparisons with metformin monotherapy initiators in 2005, adjusted hazard ratios for 5-year initiation of second-line diabetes treatment ranged from 0.90 (95% CI 0.87, 0.92) for 2006 metformin initiators to 0.68 (0.66, 0.70) for 2013 counterparts. Among those receiving second-line treatment within 5 years of metformin initiation, HbA1c at second-line medication initiation increased from 7.74 ± 1.66% in 2005 metformin initiators to 8.55 ± 1.92% in 2013 counterparts (Ptrend < 0.0001).
We observed progressive delays in diabetes treatment intensification consistent with therapeutic inertia. Process-of-care interventions early in the diabetes disease course may be needed to reverse adverse temporal trends in diabetes care.
治疗惰性威胁着 2 型糖尿病诊断后早期血糖控制潜在的长期获益。我们评估了在最初接受二甲双胍单药治疗的个体中,二线糖尿病药物起始的时间趋势。
我们纳入了美国退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统中 199042 名 2 型糖尿病患者的数据,这些患者在 2005 年至 2013 年期间接受了二甲双胍单药治疗。我们使用多变量 Cox 比例风险和线性回归来估计二甲双胍单药起始年份与 5 年随访期间二线糖尿病治疗的时间(主要结局)以及二线糖尿病治疗起始时的血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)(次要结局)之间的关联。
尽管在随访结束时平均 HbA1c 逐渐升高(从 6.94±1.28%升至 7.09±1.42%,Ptrend<0.0001),但二线药物起始的 5 年累积发生率从 2005 年二甲双胍起始者的 47%下降至 2013 年的 36%(P<0.0001)。与 2005 年接受二甲双胍单药治疗的患者相比,2006 年和 2013 年二甲双胍起始者的 5 年起始二线糖尿病治疗的调整风险比范围分别为 0.90(95%CI 0.87,0.92)和 0.68(0.66,0.70)。在接受二线治疗的患者中,HbA1c 在 5 年内从 2005 年的二甲双胍起始者的 7.74±1.66%升高至 2013 年的二甲双胍起始者的 8.55±1.92%(Ptrend<0.0001)。
我们观察到治疗强化的延迟与治疗惰性一致。在糖尿病病程早期可能需要进行基于实践的治疗干预,以扭转糖尿病护理的不利时间趋势。