• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

膝关节置换术后患者遗忘关节评分的 Rasch 分析。

Rasch analysis of the Forgotten Joint Score in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.

机构信息

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department Cotonou, National University Hospital of Cotonou, Cotonou, Benin.

Neuro-musculoskeletal Lab (NMSK), Secteur des Sciences de la Santé, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 53, B1.53.07, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jun;27(6):1984-1991. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5109-x. Epub 2018 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00167-018-5109-x
PMID:30132052
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the "Forgotten Joint Score" (FJS-12) is a unidimensional interval-level scale. Unidimensionality refers to measuring a single attribute, i.e., the single ability to forget the arthroplasty. If this property is not verified, the interpretation of the score can be confusing. Unidimensionality is an essential prerequisite of construct validity and required if FJS-12 response data are to be validly summated into a single score. Interval-level dimension is an essential prerequisite of the parametric statistics. Rasch analysis was used to test our study hypothesis.

METHODS

The FJS-12 questionnaire was validated in 248 unilateral knee arthroplasty patients. Successive analyses were used to select items with good psychometric qualities to constitute the new "FJS". The external validity was assessed with the KUJALA questionnaire.

RESULTS

Quantity of relevant items was greater than 50%. Of the 12 original items, nine showed disturbed thresholds, indicating that patients were unable to discriminate among the five levels for these items. The data set was reanalyzed using a four-level scale. The new analysis indicated that the internal consistency was good (r = 0.84). Three items did not fit with the model and they were removed. The nine items of the final scale defined a unidimensional and linear measure of the forgotten joint, and showed a continuous progression in their difficulty. The perception of difficulty was group-independent. The correlation coefficient was moderate between FJS and KUJALA score (r = 0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

This new and items reduced FJS can be used in clinical practice with good psychometric qualities. It provides a reliable tool to follow up patient's evolution and document changes related to knee arthroplasty. This valid FJS is needed in evaluating patients' assessment, one indicator of quality of care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III-Therapeutic.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证“遗忘关节评分(FJS-12)是否为一维区间量表”这一假设。所谓一维性是指测量单一属性,即评估患者对关节置换的遗忘能力。如果这一特性未经证实,那么对评分的解读可能会令人困惑。一维性是构建效度的基本前提,如果要使 FJS-12 的评分数据能够有效地加总为单一分数,则必须满足这一前提。区间尺度是参数统计的基本前提。本研究采用 Rasch 分析来检验我们的研究假设。

方法

我们对 248 例单侧膝关节置换患者进行了 FJS-12 问卷的验证。通过连续分析,选择具有良好心理测量特性的项目来构成新的“FJS”。采用 KUJALA 问卷评估其外部效度。

结果

相关项目的数量大于 50%。12 个原始项目中,有 9 个项目的阈值存在紊乱,表明患者无法区分这 9 个项目的五个水平。使用四级量表对数据集进行重新分析。新的分析表明,内部一致性良好(r=0.84)。有 3 个项目不符合模型,因此被剔除。最终量表的 9 个项目定义了一个被遗忘关节的单一、线性测量指标,且表现出难度的连续进展。对难度的感知与组别无关。FJS 与 KUJALA 评分的相关系数适中(r=0.4)。

结论

这种新的简化版 FJS 具有良好的心理测量特性,可在临床实践中使用。它为随访患者的病情演变和记录与膝关节置换相关的变化提供了可靠的工具。在评估患者的评估中,这一有效的 FJS 是评估护理质量的一个指标。

证据等级

III-治疗性。

相似文献

1
Rasch analysis of the Forgotten Joint Score in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.膝关节置换术后患者遗忘关节评分的 Rasch 分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jun;27(6):1984-1991. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5109-x. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
2
Good validity and reliability of the forgotten joint score in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty.遗忘关节评分在评估全膝关节置换术结果方面具有良好的效度和信度。
Acta Orthop. 2016 Jun;87(3):280-5. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2016.1156934. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
3
Joint awareness in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee evaluated with the 'Forgotten Joint' Score before and after joint replacement.使用“遗忘关节”评分评估髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎患者关节置换前后的关节认知。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3346-3351. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3970-4. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
4
Validation of the German Forgotten Joint Score (G-FJS) according to the COSMIN checklist: does a reduction in joint awareness indicate clinical improvement after arthroplasty of the knee?根据COSMIN检查表对德国遗忘关节评分(G-FJS)进行验证:关节意识的降低是否表明膝关节置换术后临床有所改善?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Feb;136(2):257-64. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2372-x. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
5
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: the Italian version of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 is valid and reliable to assess prosthesis awareness.单髁膝关节置换术:意大利版遗忘关节评分-12在评估假体认知方面有效且可靠。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Apr;30(4):1250-1256. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06559-y. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
6
The Forgotten Joint Score-12 in Swedish patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: a validation study with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) as comparator.在瑞典接受膝关节置换术的患者中被遗忘的关节评分-12:与膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)作为比较的验证研究。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Feb;91(1):88-93. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1689327. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
7
Joint awareness in different types of knee arthroplasty evaluated with the Forgotten Joint score.采用遗忘关节评分评估不同类型膝关节置换术中的关节意识。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jan;29(1):48-51. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.024. Epub 2013 May 18.
8
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: Which type of artificial joint do patients forget?单髁膝关节置换术与全膝关节置换术:患者更容易遗忘哪种人工关节?
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):681-686. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3868-1. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
9
Construct Validity and Test Re-Test Reliability of the Forgotten Joint Score.遗忘关节评分的结构效度和重测信度
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Nov;30(11):1902-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 May 13.
10
Simplified Chinese version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) for patients who underwent joint arthroplasty: cross-cultural adaptation and validation.关节置换术后患者遗忘关节评分(FJS)的简体中文版:跨文化调适与验证。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Jan 14;12(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0508-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative study of simultaneous and staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty: is age a key factor in surgical outcomes?同期与分期双侧全膝关节置换术的对比研究:年龄是手术结果的关键因素吗?
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Nov 8;25(1):892. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08023-7.
2
Rasch analysis of the forgotten joint score in patients with total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后遗忘关节评分的 Rasch 分析。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 Jan 10;56:jrm15774. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.15774.
3
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Provides Superior Clinical and Radiological Outcomes Compared to High Tibial Osteotomy at a Follow-Up of 5-8 Years.

本文引用的文献

1
Females, younger patients and patients with high BMI have the highest pre-operative knee awareness measured using the Forgotten Joint Score.女性、年轻患者和 BMI 较高的患者在术前使用遗忘关节评分(Forgotten Joint Score)测量时,膝关节认知度最高。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Sep;26(9):2587-2593. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4446-5. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
2
Validation of the English language Forgotten Joint Score-12 as an outcome measure for total hip and knee arthroplasty in a British population.验证英语版遗忘关节评分-12作为英国人群全髋关节和膝关节置换术结局指标的有效性。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Feb;99-B(2):218-224. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B2.BJJ-2016-0606.R1.
3
在5至8年的随访中,单髁膝关节置换术与高位胫骨截骨术相比,具有更好的临床和影像学结果。
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 19;12(16):5387. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165387.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Forgotten Joint Score for knee arthroplasty.膝关节置换术后遗忘关节评分的阿拉伯文版本的跨文化适应性、有效性和可靠性。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Oct;31(10):4312-4318. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07484-y. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
5
Affordance-Based Surgical Design Methods Considering Biomechanical Artifacts.考虑生物力学伪影的基于可供性的手术设计方法
Ecol Psychol. 2021;33(1):57-71. doi: 10.1080/10407413.2020.1792782. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
6
Global research status and trends of UKA for knee osteoarthritis: a bibliometric analysis.膝关节骨关节炎单髁置换术的全球研究现状与趋势:一项文献计量分析
Arthroplasty. 2020 Jul 24;2(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s42836-020-00039-3.
7
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Minimal Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Forgotten Joint Score.单髁膝关节置换术:遗忘关节评分的最小重要差异和患者可接受症状状态
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Apr 1;57(4):324. doi: 10.3390/medicina57040324.
Joint awareness after ACL reconstruction: patient-reported outcomes measured with the Forgotten Joint Score-12.
前交叉韧带重建术后的关节认知:采用遗忘关节评分-12评估患者报告结局
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 May;25(5):1454-1460. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4357-x. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
4
Joint awareness after total knee arthroplasty is affected by pain and quadriceps strength.全膝关节置换术后的关节感知受疼痛和股四头肌力量的影响。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Jun;102(4):435-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
5
Good validity and reliability of the forgotten joint score in evaluating the outcome of total knee arthroplasty.遗忘关节评分在评估全膝关节置换术结果方面具有良好的效度和信度。
Acta Orthop. 2016 Jun;87(3):280-5. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2016.1156934. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
6
Does post-operative knee awareness differ between knees in bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty? Predictors of high or low knee awareness.双侧同期全膝关节置换术中,双膝术后的膝关节感知是否存在差异?膝关节高感知或低感知的预测因素。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3352-3358. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4013-5. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
7
Joint awareness in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee evaluated with the 'Forgotten Joint' Score before and after joint replacement.使用“遗忘关节”评分评估髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎患者关节置换前后的关节认知。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3346-3351. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3970-4. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
8
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: Which type of artificial joint do patients forget?单髁膝关节置换术与全膝关节置换术:患者更容易遗忘哪种人工关节?
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):681-686. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3868-1. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
9
Higher forgotten joint score for fixed-bearing than for mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.固定平台全膝关节置换术的遗忘关节评分高于活动平台全膝关节置换术。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Aug;24(8):2641-5. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3663-z. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
10
Development of an item list to assess the forgotten joint concept in shoulder patients.开发一份用于评估肩部疾病患者中被遗忘关节概念的条目清单。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Mar 24;16:67. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0520-7.