• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会情感专业技能(SEE)量表:编制与初步验证

Social-Emotional Expertise (SEE) Scale: Development and Initial Validation.

作者信息

McBrien Ashley, Wild Marcus, Bachorowski Jo-Anne

机构信息

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Marian University, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 2020 Dec;27(8):1718-1730. doi: 10.1177/1073191118794866. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

DOI:10.1177/1073191118794866
PMID:30132335
Abstract

Social-emotional expertise (SEE) represents a synthesis of specific cognitive abilities related to social interactions, and emphasizes the timing and synchrony of behaviors that contribute to overall social-emotional ability. As a step toward SEE construct validation, we conducted three experiments to develop a self-report measure that captured key elements of our conceptualization of SEE. In Experiment 1, we generated and tested 76 items for a measure of SEE. The resultant 25-item scale is reliable, test-retest: (80) = .82, < .001, and internally consistent (Cronbach's α = .90). Experiments 2 and 3 examined the relationships between the SEE Scale and related constructs. Convergent constructs, such as emotional intelligence, (885) = .62, < .01, and social anxiety, (885) = -.59, < .01, and discriminant constructs, such as social desirability, (885) = .19, < .01, and self-monitoring, (885) = .28, < .01, were found to be related in the expected directions. Additionally, two factors were statistically identified: Adaptability and Expressivity. The items contributing to each factor describe the ability to successfully navigate social environments and the ability to successfully convey affect and ideas to other people, respectively. These factors correlate with related constructs in distinct and theoretically relevant ways.

摘要

社会情感专业技能(SEE)代表了与社会互动相关的特定认知能力的综合,并强调了有助于整体社会情感能力的行为的时机和同步性。作为迈向SEE结构验证的一步,我们进行了三项实验,以开发一种自我报告测量方法,该方法能够捕捉我们对SEE概念化的关键要素。在实验1中,我们生成并测试了76个用于测量SEE的项目。最终得到的25个项目的量表是可靠的,重测信度:(80)=.82,<.001,内部一致性(克朗巴哈α系数=.90)。实验2和实验3研究了SEE量表与相关结构之间的关系。发现收敛性结构,如情商,(885)=.62,<.01,和社交焦虑,(885)=-.59,<.01,以及区分性结构,如社会期望,(885)=.19,<.01,和自我监控,(885)=.28,<.01,在预期方向上相关。此外,从统计学上确定了两个因素:适应性和表达性。对每个因素有贡献的项目分别描述了成功驾驭社会环境的能力和成功向他人传达情感和想法的能力。这些因素与相关结构以独特且在理论上相关的方式相关联。

相似文献

1
Social-Emotional Expertise (SEE) Scale: Development and Initial Validation.社会情感专业技能(SEE)量表:编制与初步验证
Assessment. 2020 Dec;27(8):1718-1730. doi: 10.1177/1073191118794866. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
2
[Refinement of the French sociotropy-autonomy scale: Validation of a 20-item measure of social dependency among first-year students at the university].[法国社会依赖-自主量表的优化:大学一年级学生社会依赖20项测量指标的验证]
Encephale. 2020 Aug;46(4):248-257. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2019.10.007. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
3
The Hearing Impairment Impact-Significant Other Profile (HII-SOP): a tool to measure hearing loss-related quality of life in spouses of people with hearing loss.听力障碍影响——重要他人概况(HII-SOP):一种用于测量听力损失者配偶中与听力损失相关生活质量的工具。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Nov-Dec;23(10):807-23. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.10.6.
4
[Preliminary validation of the French translation of anxiety sensibility index-revised (ASI-R)].[焦虑敏感性指数修订版(ASI-R)法语翻译的初步验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):157-64.
5
Social anxiety and fear of negative evaluation: construct validity of the BFNE-II.社交焦虑与对负面评价的恐惧:BFNE-II的结构效度
J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21(1):131-41. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.010. Epub 2006 May 3.
6
[The Fear of Negative Evaluation scale (FNE): psychometric properties of the French version].[恐惧负面评价量表(FNE):法语版的心理测量特性]
Encephale. 2004 Nov-Dec;30(6):517-24. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95465-6.
7
Development and initial validation of primary care provider mental illness management and team-based care self-efficacy scales.基层医疗服务提供者精神疾病管理及团队式照护自我效能量表的开发与初步验证
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2017 Mar-Apr;45:44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
8
Development and validation of a self-report measure of emotional intelligence as a multidimensional trait domain.作为多维度特质领域的情商自我报告测量方法的开发与验证。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Jul;31(7):859-88. doi: 10.1177/0146167204272860.
9
[Conceptualisation and validation of the "Emotional State Questionnaire (ESQ)": evaluation of an emotional profile].["情绪状态问卷(ESQ)的概念化与验证:一种情绪概况评估"]
Encephale. 2007 Mar-Apr;33(2):169-78. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(07)91547-x.
10
Examining Validity and Reliability of the Emotional Reactions Checklist with Hospitalized Children.检验住院儿童情绪反应清单的有效性和可靠性。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2015 Aug;16(4):579-86. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2014.10.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Item response theory modelling of the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire-short form: item streamlining, differential item functioning, and validity in a Swedish multicenter cross-sectional study.特质情绪智力量表简版的项目反应理论建模:瑞典多中心横断面研究中的项目精简、项目功能差异及效度
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 29;13(1):987. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03271-1.
2
Medication adherence, health outcomes, and perceived social performance in Black Americans receiving hemodialysis.接受血液透析的美国黑人的药物依从性、健康结局及感知社会表现
Health Psychol. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1037/hea0001543.
3
Exploring Social Cognition Sub-Domains and Predictors in Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.
探索多发性硬化症中的社会认知子领域及预测因素:一项横断面研究
Brain Behav. 2025 Jul;15(7):e70691. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70691.
4
Resilience and Social-Emotional Expertise as Predictors of Problematic Internet Use Among University Students.复原力和社会情感专业技能作为大学生网络使用问题的预测因素
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 10;15(5):650. doi: 10.3390/bs15050650.
5
Quantifying social performance: A review with implications for further work.量化社会绩效:一项具有后续研究意义的综述。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 27;14:1124385. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124385. eCollection 2023.
6
Expertise in emotion: A scoping review and unifying framework for individual differences in the mental representation of emotional experience.情绪专长:情绪体验心理表征个体差异的范围综述和统一框架。
Psychol Bull. 2021 Nov;147(11):1159-1183. doi: 10.1037/bul0000327.
7
Lay Beliefs About Interaction Quality: An Expertise Perspective on Individual Differences in Interpersonal Emotion Ability.关于互动质量的外行信念:人际情感能力个体差异的专业视角
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 25;11:277. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00277. eCollection 2020.
8
A Music-Mediated Language Learning Experience: Students' Awareness of Their Socio-Emotional Skills.一种音乐介导的语言学习体验:学生对其社会情感技能的认知。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 4;10:2238. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02238. eCollection 2019.