Copoeru Ion
Department of Philosophy, Babeş-Bolyai University from Cluj-Napoca, 1. Kogalniceanu Street, 40081, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
ICUB, University of Bucharest, 36-46 Bd. M. Kogalniceanu, 5th District, 050107, Bucharest, Romania.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Oct;24(5):1101-1106. doi: 10.1111/jep.13022. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
This paper stems from the concern that, in certain situations, categorization may lead to the annihilation of the subject. It attempts to answer the question whether there is a way of framing addiction without necessarily putting the addicted persons in categories that hurt them. After showing, in the first section, how stigma is part of the process of becoming (and remaining) addicted, I will turn to the phenomenological tradition in order to re-consider the main descriptive categories that have been used so far to capture addiction as a "pathological" or "deviant" experience. The second section addresses addiction as an experience of hetero-transformation of the psycho-physical unity of the individual, which presupposes a genuine sense of the power of the bodily subject, while the third focuses on the modifications of temporality in addiction, especially in the horizon of trauma. The paper concludes that understanding addiction depends on framing the experience of addiction primarily as a non-pathological form of expression and looking at it as an attempt to restore the capabilities of a vulnerable subject.
在某些情况下,分类可能导致主体的消亡。它试图回答是否有一种方式来界定成瘾,而不必将成瘾者归入那些会伤害他们的类别。在第一节展示了污名如何成为成瘾(以及保持成瘾状态)过程的一部分之后,我将转向现象学传统,以便重新审视迄今为止用于将成瘾描述为一种“病态”或“越轨”体验的主要描述性类别。第二节将成瘾视为个体身心统一体的异质转变体验,这预设了对身体主体力量的真实感受,而第三节则聚焦于成瘾中时间性的变化,尤其是在创伤的视域中。本文的结论是,理解成瘾取决于将成瘾体验主要构建为一种非病态的表达形式,并将其视为恢复脆弱主体能力的一种尝试。