Wiesbeck G A, Täschner K L
Psychiatrischen Klinik des Bürgerhospitals, Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart.
Versicherungsmedizin. 1993 Jun 1;45(3):82-5.
To apply the term "addiction" to non-substantial addiction-like behavior is both problematic and useful. It is problematic because the uncritical application of the term has led to an inflation of addictions. If everything is called addiction the term is losing its predicative power and is getting meaningless. In the field of non-substantial addicted behavior we have been given the chance to study the phenomenon addiction in "pure" form without disturbing influences of any substance. To apply the term "addiction" to non-substantial addicted behavior is possible in principle. Von Gebsattel 1954 and Giese 1962 have already referred to this. However, it requires well-defined criterias. A strictly composition of the term would be recommendable.
将“成瘾”一词应用于非物质性成瘾样行为既存在问题又有其用处。说它存在问题，是因为不加批判地使用该词导致成瘾现象泛滥。如果一切都被称为成瘾，那么这个词就会失去其描述能力，变得毫无意义。在非物质性成瘾行为领域，我们有机会以“纯粹”形式研究成瘾现象，而不受任何物质的干扰影响。原则上，将“成瘾”一词应用于非物质性成瘾行为是可行的。冯·格布塞尔在1954年和吉泽在1962年就已经提及过这一点。然而，这需要明确的标准。对该词进行严格界定是值得推荐的。
