Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Royal United Hospitals, and University of Bath, Bath, UK.
University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Aug;71(8):1119-1126. doi: 10.1002/acr.23729. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
Assessment of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is reliant on self-report. The Raynaud's Condition Score (RCS) diary assumes discrete episodic RP attacks, although not all SSc patients identify with this paradigm. We investigated the clinical associations of SSc-RP symptom characteristics and the evolution of SSc-RP symptoms with disease progression.
A cross-sectional study at UK and US sites captured digital color changes of SSc-RP and patients' ability to identify with diagrammatic representations (and descriptive stems) of 4 distinct theoretical SSc-RP patterns (progressing severity A through D) reflecting progressively severe SSc-RP experiences. SSc-RP self-management and symptom evolution were explored. Patient demographics, the clinical phenotype, the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ), the 2-week RCS diary, and patient and physician global assessments were collected.
We enrolled 107 patients with SSc (with questionnaires returned by 94). A higher number of self-reported digital color changes of SSc-RP were associated with increased SSc-RP symptom severity but not with the SSc clinical phenotype. Patients could identify with distinct patterns of SSc-RP. These patterns were associated with disease duration, global disease severity, and conceptually linked physician and patient assessments of peripheral vascular severity (e.g., SHAQ RP subscale and RCS diary parameters), but not with conceptually unrelated outcomes (e.g., SHAQ breathing subscale). SSc-RP characteristics and symptom severity evolve during the disease course.
Patients identify with distinct patterns of SSc-RP that may relate to progression of the obliterative microangiopathy of SSc. Difficulty distinguishing discrete SSc-RP attacks from persistent digital ischemia in patients with advanced SSc could influence diary-based approaches to assessing SSc-RP, with implications for future clinical trials.
系统性硬化症(SSc)中雷诺现象(RP)的评估依赖于自我报告。雷纳德条件评分(RCS)日记假设离散发作性 RP 发作,尽管并非所有 SSc 患者都认同这种模式。我们研究了 SSc-RP 症状特征的临床关联以及 SSc-RP 症状的演变与疾病进展的关系。
英国和美国的一项横断面研究捕获了 SSc-RP 的数字颜色变化,以及患者识别 4 种不同理论 SSc-RP 模式(从 A 到 D 表示逐渐严重的 RP 体验)的能力,这些模式反映了逐渐严重的 SSc-RP 体验。探讨了 SSc-RP 的自我管理和症状演变。收集了患者人口统计学资料、临床表型、硬皮病健康评估问卷(SHAQ)、两周 RCS 日记以及患者和医生的总体评估。
我们招募了 107 名 SSc 患者(有 94 名患者返回了问卷)。自我报告的 SSc-RP 数字颜色变化次数越多,与 SSc-RP 症状严重程度增加相关,但与 SSc 临床表型无关。患者可以识别出不同的 SSc-RP 模式。这些模式与疾病持续时间、总体疾病严重程度以及概念上相关的外周血管严重程度的医生和患者评估相关(例如,SHAQ RP 子量表和 RCS 日记参数),但与概念上不相关的结局无关(例如,SHAQ 呼吸子量表)。SSc-RP 特征和症状严重程度在疾病过程中演变。
患者识别出不同的 SSc-RP 模式,这些模式可能与 SSc 闭塞性微血管病的进展有关。在晚期 SSc 患者中,从持续的数字缺血中区分离散的 SSc-RP 发作可能会影响基于日记的评估 SSc-RP 的方法,这对未来的临床试验有影响。